Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 23 Jul 2012 (Monday) 14:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7d Raw Quality minus resolution question

 
jaomul
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Cork, Ireland
     
Jul 23, 2012 14:34 |  #1

On a 7d there are options to have small and medium size raw files. While I normally try to always use the largest possible resolution in case I get a shot that somehow requires this. I also regularly shoot with a 10d and usually 6mp is enough. My question is if the smaller raw files types are selected do you lose image quality, or just resolution? Thanks


flickr (external link)
Olympus EM5,Nikon d7200,
Olympus 12-50mm, 40-150mm,17mm f2.8,Nikon 50mm F1.8, Tamron 90mm vc, 18-105mmVR, Sigma 18-35 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 23, 2012 14:42 |  #2

Much like resizing down a JPG, you will end up with the same basic result but with a raw file.

This post is very similar and the responses should be about the same: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=775425


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lincolnshire ­ Poacher
Member
115 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Lincolnshire, UK
     
Jul 23, 2012 14:43 |  #3

It depends on how large you wish to print and/or how much you wish to crop.

The usual recommended PPI (pixels per inch) for printing is 300. So if your camera produces images 6000 pixels wide by 3000 pixels high, you can comfortably print at 20 inches by 10 inches. However if you wish to crop your image, then you lose a number of pixels so cannot print quite a large.

On the other hand, if the image is destined for viewing on the web or in an e-mail, then 72 PPI is ample. In that case, taking shots at a lower than maximun resolution makes sense as it reduces the files sizes massively.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NinetyEight
"Banned for life"
Avatar
3,207 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Dorset - England
     
Jul 23, 2012 14:45 |  #4

Lincolnshire Poacher wrote in post #14758045 (external link)
It depends on how large you wish to print and/or how much you wish to crop.

The usual recommended PPI (pixels per inch) for printing is 300. So if your camera produces images 6000 pixels wide by 3000 pixels high, you can comfortably print at 20 inches by 10 inches. However if you wish to crop your image, then you lose a number of pixels so cannot print quite a large.

On the other hand, if the image is destined for viewing on the web or in an e-mail, then 72 PPI is ample. In that case, taking shots at a lower than maximun resolution makes sense as it reduces the files sizes massively.

For web use ppi is absolutely meaningless - all that matters is the number of pixels, so yes, if you are purely shooting for web use the smaller files.


Kev

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 23, 2012 14:51 |  #5

The larger the print, the lesser need for high DPI when printing. You can print poster-sized 20x30 photos at 200-240 DPI and they will look great, provided the original source material looks good and you upsize using good tools.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaomul
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Cork, Ireland
     
Jul 23, 2012 14:53 |  #6

Thanks all. I gather if I do not need the res in certain cases I wont lose quality by selecting smaller raw files.


flickr (external link)
Olympus EM5,Nikon d7200,
Olympus 12-50mm, 40-150mm,17mm f2.8,Nikon 50mm F1.8, Tamron 90mm vc, 18-105mmVR, Sigma 18-35 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lincolnshire ­ Poacher
Member
115 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Lincolnshire, UK
     
Jul 23, 2012 14:55 |  #7

NinetyEight wrote in post #14758058 (external link)
For web use ppi is absolutely meaningless - all that matters is the number of pixels, so yes, if you are purely shooting for web use the smaller files.

You are of course correct. It's been a long, long day!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,466 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
7d Raw Quality minus resolution question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1246 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.