pyro1 Goldmember  More info | 1DX MKIII, Twin 1DX, 5D mk III - EF 16-35 f/2.8L II USM - EF 24-105 f/4L IS USM - EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS USM II - EF 100-400 f/4.5 L IS USM - EF 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS USM - EF 85mm f/1.2 L II USM - Tam 24-70 f/2.8 Di VC - 580EXII - Einsteins & CyberSync System - Vagabond Mini -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 25, 2013 19:05 | #7277
http://emjfotografi.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 25, 2013 20:19 | #7278   City Behind Bars by DavioTheOne, on FlickrGear: 5D3, 135L, Sigma 35, 50 1.8 STM, 16-35 F/4L IS, 85/1.8, Fujifilm X100T
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 25, 2013 20:29 | #7279 I can't seem to get my images small enough to upload on this forum(no larger than 1024 pixels on the longest side, no more than 150k) . Even if I crop my image down to 900px x 600px, and 'Save for Web & Devices' at a level of 45, they're still above 200k. How do you all get your images to appear so large yet still fall within POTN's guidelines? I'd rather not have to reduce the quality of my images so much that they look crappy, just to be able to post them here. I can do a lot of things in Photoshop but apparently this isn't one of them the site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 25, 2013 20:33 | #7280 PhotoMatte wrote in post #15534348 I can't seem to get my images small enough to upload on this forum(no larger than 1024 pixels on the longest side, no more than 150k) . Even if I crop my image down to 900px x 600px, and 'Save for Web & Devices' at a level of 45, they're still above 200k. How do you all get your images to appear so large yet still fall within POTN's guidelines? I'd rather not have to reduce the quality of my images so much that they look crappy, just to be able to post them here. I can do a lot of things in Photoshop but apparently this isn't one of them  I had the same problem as you, and when I did get my images down to 150K they really sucked. Now I link them from Flickr, as long as they're no larger than 1024 they can be any size IDX Mark III/1DX Mark II/EOS R5- 16-35L f4 IS - 135L - 24-70L f2.8 IS II - 70-200L f2.8 IS II- 100-400 IIL IS - RF 100 Macro f2.8L IS - 85mm 1.4 IS L RF 28-70 f/2 L- Σ 50 1.4 Art - Σ 70 Macro - TC 1.4 II - EF 12/25 II - Profoto A1 - Manfrotto 055CXPRO3/Really Right Stuff BH55
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 25, 2013 20:42 | #7281 Chiefy wrote in post #15534358 Now I link them from Flickr, as long as they're no larger than 1024 they can be any size I've seen people using that option but I like seeing photos directly in the post; I just can't figure out how to do it! I shoot entirely in RAW, and a lot of times I'm using a fairly high ISO, both of which mean larger file sizes to begin with. I could convert everything to B&W to make it work but that's not always what I want to show. the site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 25, 2013 20:51 | #7282 PhotoMatte wrote in post #15534395 I've seen people using that option but I like seeing photos directly in the post; I just can't figure out how to do it! I shoot entirely in RAW, and a lot of times I'm using a fairly high ISO, both of which mean larger file sizes to begin with. I could convert everything to B&W to make it work but that's not always what I want to show. If you upload the photo direct to here then you're limited to 150k, there is no way to get around that as far as I know. And at 150K most of my photos looked terrible. IDX Mark III/1DX Mark II/EOS R5- 16-35L f4 IS - 135L - 24-70L f2.8 IS II - 70-200L f2.8 IS II- 100-400 IIL IS - RF 100 Macro f2.8L IS - 85mm 1.4 IS L RF 28-70 f/2 L- Σ 50 1.4 Art - Σ 70 Macro - TC 1.4 II - EF 12/25 II - Profoto A1 - Manfrotto 055CXPRO3/Really Right Stuff BH55
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 25, 2013 21:00 | #7283  City Behind Branches by DavioTheOne, on FlickrGear: 5D3, 135L, Sigma 35, 50 1.8 STM, 16-35 F/4L IS, 85/1.8, Fujifilm X100T
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pokdeng Member  44 posts Likes: 6 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Kota Bharu More info | Jan 25, 2013 21:19 | #7284
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AAphotog Senior Member 828 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2012 More info | Jan 25, 2013 21:27 | #7285  Permanent banWhich version does everyone like better?
or  5d3, 50mm 1.4, 70-200mm F4 L, 17-40mm F4 L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trevert2 Member 112 posts Joined Nov 2009 More info | Jan 25, 2013 21:35 | #7286 I like number 1  3C6A9335 el by Trevor Powell, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
triton3k Goldmember  3,358 posts Likes: 283 Joined Aug 2011 Location: The Bronx, NYC More info | Jan 25, 2013 22:38 | #7287 Day 25/365  365 PROJECT DAY 25 by Denn-Ice, on FlickrDenn_Ice
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 25, 2013 22:52 | #7288
- Alfredo -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 25, 2013 23:23 | #7289 PhotoMatte wrote in post #15534348 I can't seem to get my images small enough to upload on this forum(no larger than 1024 pixels on the longest side, no more than 150k) . Even if I crop my image down to 900px x 600px, and 'Save for Web & Devices' at a level of 45, they're still above 200k. How do you all get your images to appear so large yet still fall within POTN's guidelines? I'd rather not have to reduce the quality of my images so much that they look crappy, just to be able to post them here. I can do a lot of things in Photoshop but apparently this isn't one of them The easiest way IMO, is to use an image hosting site like Imageshack. http://emjfotografi.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 25, 2013 23:43 | #7290  my youtube https://www.youtube.com …b_confirmation=1%5B%2Furl
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1224 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
