tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jul 27, 2012 14:11 | #1 http://www.imaging-resource.com …2-one-vs.-two-old-vs.-new Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.  57,738 posts Likes: 4072 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Jul 27, 2012 14:26 | #2 Hmmmm.. Very interesting. I guess I can stop double tapping now. Also, I have ben using LV focus whenever possible thinking the results are better and the data seems to prove it out. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shinksma Senior Member  710 posts Joined Jul 2011 More info | Jul 27, 2012 15:31 | #3 So...what your saying is that I need new equipment to get the best possible outcome, for all components as they get upgraded. New body, and news lenses as each model is upgraded. 5DII | T3i | EF 17-40 L | EF 24-105 L | EF 24 1.4 L II | EF 28 1.8 | EF 85 1.8 | EF 70-200 2.8 L IS II | EF 100-400 L | EF-S 15-85 IS USM | EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM | EF-S 10-22 USM | EF 100 2.8 Macro USM | EF-S 18-55 IS | EF 35-80 III | EF-S 55-250 IS | Rokinon 8mm FE | EF 75-300 non-USM III | SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 | Tamron 70-210 | 430EX II | Kenko 2x MC4 and 1.4x Pro300DGX TC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jul 27, 2012 15:49 | #4 I'm just linking, I'm not saying anything! Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shinksma Senior Member 710 posts Joined Jul 2011 More info | Jul 27, 2012 20:48 | #5 Yeah, I know. 5DII | T3i | EF 17-40 L | EF 24-105 L | EF 24 1.4 L II | EF 28 1.8 | EF 85 1.8 | EF 70-200 2.8 L IS II | EF 100-400 L | EF-S 15-85 IS USM | EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM | EF-S 10-22 USM | EF 100 2.8 Macro USM | EF-S 18-55 IS | EF 35-80 III | EF-S 55-250 IS | Rokinon 8mm FE | EF 75-300 non-USM III | SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 | Tamron 70-210 | 430EX II | Kenko 2x MC4 and 1.4x Pro300DGX TC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jul 27, 2012 20:56 | #6 Also, when many 90s lenses were designed, the standard for in focus was 8x10 prints. How would you even pixel peep those? Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wayne.robbins Goldmember 2,062 posts Joined Nov 2010 More info | Jul 27, 2012 21:05 | #7 ^^^ Come on- sounds like the original use for a loupe EOS 5D III, EOS 7D,EOS Rebel T4i, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS II, Canon 24-105L, Canon 18-135 IS STM, 1.4x TC III, 2.0x TC III, Σ 50mm f/1.4, Σ 17-50 OS, Σ 70-200 OS, Σ 50-500 OS, Σ 1.4x TC, Σ 2.0x TC, 580EXII(3), Canon SX-40, Canon S100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jul 27, 2012 22:13 | #8 wayne.robbins wrote in post #14779721  Something tells me you've been around a while... Nah, I'm not that old, just a classic know-it-all smartass with too much time to waste on forums. Only just turned 33. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2795 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
Something tells me you've been around a while... Didn't pixel peeping come into fashion with the age of digital ?
