Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 28 Jul 2012 (Saturday) 12:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Looking for feedback on a couple of SLR/lens combos

 
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,069 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5647
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Jul 31, 2012 08:44 |  #16

^ Now you tell me! LOL...

Anyway, that's fine.. The points you make are precisely the ones that I played around with in my head before I had to to take a pick. I suspect though that either camera at this time would far exceed my skills and will stay that way for a while.


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,403 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 525
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
     
Jul 31, 2012 11:09 |  #17

I am not a big fan of the 70-300 IS at its normal price point, but at the price you obtained it the lens is a decent value. You should be able to get more than your money back when you eventually outgrow the lens. This was my first telephoto lens quite a few years ago, and it was soft at 300mm and the auto focus performance was marginal, especially in lower light. I upgraded to the 70-200 f/4 IS soon after it hit the market, and was much happier.

For birds, you will eventually want something longer than 300mm, so start saving now. :)


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,069 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5647
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Jul 31, 2012 11:19 |  #18

Scott, yes, I've been reading up on the better lenses. I'll be licking my wounds here for a bit before venturing into the >$1K regime though. I used to own a Minolta Maxxum 7000 back in the late 80s, but have pretty much owned P&Ss for the last 10-15 years. The Maxxum was a top-rated camera back then, but cameras these days are so different, I suspect I'll be in basic learning mode for quite a while with my T3i.


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
prustyaditya
Member
55 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Aug 03, 2012 10:15 |  #19

What about :
T3i = 579 USD
17-55 = 1099 USD
Total = 1678 USD
This is a great combo if you dont mind a heavy lens and not having the longer zooms


hi.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,069 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5647
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Aug 05, 2012 21:31 |  #20

Well, first photo off the combo - T3i with the 70-300

Great blue heron in a wetland area near my house

Aperture priority, F5.6, 1/500 sec, 300mm.

I'm still learning how to make the camera focus on what I want it to and not the background, etc. as well as the different metering schemes, so all I did here was to choose the aperture and press the button. Got a long way to go to come close to some of the stuff posted here, but I've got to start somewhere I guess. :)

EMBED PREVENTED
CUSTOM DOWNLOAD SIZE LIMIT 2.5 MB EXCEEDED: 3.39 MB
http://img542.imagesha​ck.us/img542/8242/007m​odified2.jpg

Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thinline
Member
38 posts
Joined Jul 2012
     
Aug 05, 2012 23:50 |  #21

Focus point selection is amazingly easy and fast on the T3i. Check out page 85 of the instruction manual located here:

http://www.usa.canon.c​om …i_kit#Brochures​AndManuals (external link)

From what you described I think you made the right choice. Have fun!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3433
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Aug 06, 2012 00:02 |  #22

just make sure you actually select your focus point, and not have it be all focus points, and you should be able to nail focus fairly easily...also i'd say open up the lens a bit...your shot was at f11 according to my exif viewers


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,069 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5647
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Aug 06, 2012 00:06 |  #23

You're right... I shot two photos, one at f5.6 and the other at f11.. this one was at f11. Thanks for the tip on focusing.. having so many buttons and controls is a bit overwhelming and it is slowly sinking in.. :D


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeWa
Senior Member
Avatar
879 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Likes: 235
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Seattle Washington
     
Aug 09, 2012 10:39 as a reply to  @ Scrumhalf's post |  #24

So how are you liking the 70-300 lens so far? That is a great Heron shot. With a couple of adjustments in DPP or Zoom Browser it could really pop. You captured the detail in the wings and the down. Which is sometimes hard to do. You just need to bring it out. Use the tone curve on the tool pallet. Very minor adjustments. Think S shape. Play with it and have some fun.

Regards
Mike


Mike...G9; 7D; 7D Mark II; EF-S 10-22mm; EF-S 18-135mm IS STM; EF 28-300mm F3.5-5.6L; EF 70-300mm IS USM; EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS-II; EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS; EXT 1.4-II & 2.0-III; The more I learn the less I know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,069 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5647
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Aug 09, 2012 13:22 |  #25

Loving it so far! Took it to the Tualatin River Wildlife Refuge yesterday and spent a couple of hours there shooting birds. The 300mm reach was not enough to produce any quality pictures, but enough to help identify them back at the visitor's center with the rangers there.

Thanks for the tips on the adjustments. That's the next thing I've got to learn to do. I'll play around.. I also have a hand-me-down copy of Elements 5.0 that I am planning to use to learn post-processing with.


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeWa
Senior Member
Avatar
879 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Likes: 235
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Seattle Washington
     
Aug 09, 2012 15:15 as a reply to  @ Scrumhalf's post |  #26

Yes the reach can be a little short on occasion. However I just shot the Blue Angels air show with mine and it worked just fine. Remember with your camera it is like a full frame croped to 480mm. It can be quite difficult to hand hold longer lenses like 400mm and get a non blury image. Also for those long shots air shimmer and moisture really come into play over 300mm. So when you start doing those long shots at 400-500mm, 640-800mm equivilent, time of day and air quality really can come into play. It even comes into play at 300mm. Shoot license plates accross a large parking lot at 2pm on a hot day and you will see what I mean.

Here are two shots of a street sign exactly 3/4 mile away one at noon and one at 7pm. Sorry but I have already deleted the really bad shimmer and moisture blured shots. These will still get you the idea though. Both are with the 70-300 lens at 300mm hand held. Both shots are cropped just under 200% so they are indeed pushing the envelope but it just goes to show you what that lens is capable of. The effect air quality can have on the outcome is quite visable.

Regards
Mike

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/08/2/LQ_609605.jpg
Image hosted by forum (609605) © MikeWa [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/08/2/LQ_609608.jpg
Image hosted by forum (609608) © MikeWa [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Mike...G9; 7D; 7D Mark II; EF-S 10-22mm; EF-S 18-135mm IS STM; EF 28-300mm F3.5-5.6L; EF 70-300mm IS USM; EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS-II; EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS; EXT 1.4-II & 2.0-III; The more I learn the less I know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,069 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5647
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Aug 09, 2012 17:09 |  #27

Great tips, Mike! As an amateur stargazer (Televue TV-85 apo refractor and Celestron CPC-1100 SCT), I am painfully familiar with atmospheric effects playing havoc with the image.. :)

I also need to invest in a good light tripod that I can carry with me on the trail. They have an observing blind at the Tualatin River refuge that can be reserved... I hope to get a tripod, a few sandwiches and make it a half-day excursion with my birdwatching 7 year old son.


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeWa
Senior Member
Avatar
879 posts
Gallery: 89 photos
Likes: 235
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Seattle Washington
     
Aug 09, 2012 17:40 as a reply to  @ Scrumhalf's post |  #28

That sounds like a great day out. My copy of the 70-300 works better on a solid tripod with the IS turned off. You might want to check yours in advance of your outing.

Mike


Mike...G9; 7D; 7D Mark II; EF-S 10-22mm; EF-S 18-135mm IS STM; EF 28-300mm F3.5-5.6L; EF 70-300mm IS USM; EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS-II; EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS; EXT 1.4-II & 2.0-III; The more I learn the less I know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ickmcdon
Senior Member
323 posts
Joined Apr 2012
Location: North Dakota
     
Aug 09, 2012 22:52 |  #29

I think you made the right choice. And I like my 70-300. 200 is MUCH too short for birds, etc.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scrumhalf
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,069 posts
Gallery: 158 photos
Likes: 5647
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Portland, Oregon USA
     
Aug 10, 2012 08:42 |  #30

ickmcdon wrote in post #14838466 (external link)
I think you made the right choice. And I like my 70-300. 200 is MUCH too short for birds, etc.

Even 300 is not enough! And the 70-300 does not accommodate an extender. I see a 400 and a 1.4X extender in my future.... someday. :D


Sam
5D4 | R7 | 7D2 | Reasonably good glass
Gear List

If I don't get the shots I want with the gear I have, the only optics I need to examine is the mirror on the bathroom wall. The root cause will be there.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,148 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Looking for feedback on a couple of SLR/lens combos
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2693 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.