Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 29 Jul 2012 (Sunday) 04:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Worth upgrading my 7D?

 
BugNyou
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Jul 2012
     
Jul 29, 2012 04:29 |  #1

Hello.

New to the forums :mrgreen:. Got sent here by a friend whom only made my dilema worse.

I'm considering upgrading my 7D which has served me well for the past 2 years or so. Not because its bad. I love it. But because I just want something newer, maybe better :o

I shoot wildlife and macro, About 50-50, Sometimes in the rain.
I'm using 300 F/4 & 400mm F/5.6 for wildlife (I have sigma 1.4 TC but no AF with the 400mm :().
For macro I'm using 100mm f/2.8 and some tubes for get closer.
All of my gear I got second hand. Full price is too much price as I see it.

I thought of buying a 1D4 for the better weather protection and stronger body (I had to get my 7D repaired a few times from rain damage and because I'm stupid). I really wanted to buy a 1D3 because they are stupidly cheap for what you get, but I think 10MP won't be enough for me if I need to crop an image, and still have enough to quality for a print.

My friend told me that for almost the same price of the 1D4, I can get a new 5D3. I don't really need a 5D3, and I don't want to lose the "zooming" of the 1.6 crop. But its 22MP so cropping should keep in the game.

I'm mainly shooting AF with center point, so 19/45/100/1 billion AF points, don't care. I'm using burst & ai servo for wildlife (6-7 shots), and fully manual in macro.

I don't really get paid. I shoot on my own time and for my own enjoyment. Usually just sell a print or two if I got something really good at a local photostore, and help a friend as a second photographer in a wedding to pay off some of my gear (I borrow a short zoom lens from someone when I'm doing weddings or family events, as 99% of the time I don't need it).

So help me out. I have an hunger to get something new just for the excitment. I don't feel I need a new lens.
Also my young kid (16) wants a camera of his own, and I can give him my 7D. On the other hand, I can just get him a 600D as a birthday present and tell him "here, now go shoot some videos of you and your friends making a fool of each other", and he will still be happy.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mchis
Junior Member
Avatar
25 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Bucharest, Romania
     
Jul 29, 2012 06:29 |  #2

Well, I did upgrade from 7D to 5D3 and, once I was able to ignore the price difference and judge the technical difference, I was *more* than satisfied. IQ difference is immense imho especially in terms of sharpness & ISO, ergonomics are better (and 7D was pretty good in that area!), AF is much more accurate (AF failure rate is insignificant as compared to the 7D), many more AF points, auto-ISO implementation is very good, MF adjustment is now available at both ends for zooms - I think I could go on, but you probably got the idea :-)

Cannot speak of 1D4 or 1D3, but if you can afford a 5D3 then my advice would be to consider it seriously.

Note: I didn't use 7D with the latest firmware jump.


Passionate amateur. Main gear: 5D3/Skopar20/35L/24-105

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chumlee
Goldmember
Avatar
1,989 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: New Jersey
     
Jul 29, 2012 06:42 |  #3

I love full frame and everything, but some part of me would choose the 1d4 over the 5d3...especially for birding. I know that the 5d3 is capable of doing it, but I would still choose the 1d4 for some reason.


Leica M3 | Contax G2 |
No, I'm not the guy from Pawn Stars...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCAsan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,918 posts
Likes: 88
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
Jul 29, 2012 06:56 as a reply to  @ chumlee's post |  #4

To significantly step up from 7D...to a camera that will stay in production for awhile....you would need to go to 5DIII or 1DX. 5DIII has a slightly slower frame high speed frame rate. IMHO, that is more thank compensated for by the killer AF system. 1DX would be best of all...at a huge cost.

On the safari we did in June/July, I had my 7D and 5DIII. Most of my shots were with 5DIII and my 100-400. Only a few times did I need the 7D with a rented 500.

Which brings me to another point. You really want to have two camera bodies whenever possible. You never know when a camera bodies dies, has an accident, or simply does not have the best lens attached. Having two camera bodies gives you options....and a backup. So keep the 7D if at all possible as a great backup body.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaomul
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Cork, Ireland
     
Jul 29, 2012 07:21 |  #5

You probably have to as you will in time destroy your 7d unless you invest in a good weather proof system for it. Consider also how big you print. If you have 10mp and crop to 5mp (quite a significant crop), you can still print apprx 9 inches by 6 inches @ 300ppi, drop to 200ppi (which many find acceptable) and your in around 13 inches by 9 inches (again approx)


flickr (external link)
Olympus EM5,Nikon d7200,
Olympus 12-50mm, 40-150mm,17mm f2.8,Nikon 50mm F1.8, Tamron 90mm vc, 18-105mmVR, Sigma 18-35 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jase1125
Goldmember
Avatar
3,027 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 82
Joined May 2010
Location: Lewisville, TX (DFW)
     
Jul 29, 2012 07:25 |  #6

I wouldn't upgrade. Nothing you have listed indicates to me that you would see a significant improvement. The only exception is the improved weather sealing of the 1D.


Jason

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neilrohrbacker
Member
104 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 29, 2012 08:03 |  #7

You shoot in the rain and you have had to get your 7D repaired twice as a result. Everything above is interesting, but bottom line, you need a 1D something. Now you need to ask yourself how much your in for (1,500 - 3,750 - 6,800).

Good luck.


Gear: A whole bunch a stuff...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon_Doh
Senior Member
Avatar
878 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 68
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Pyongyang, North Korea
     
Jul 29, 2012 08:16 |  #8

The 1D Mark III and IV don't have a 1.6 crop factor, but 1.3, so if the 1.6 crop is important, you need to keep this difference in mind in making your choice.


I use a Kodak Brownie

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BugNyou
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Jul 2012
     
Jul 29, 2012 08:52 |  #9

Thank you guys for the advices :)

jaomul:
I usually print at 21x15 give or take, so I try to keep it at 14MP at 200PPI. Some times when I have to crop a lot more, I would print at about 150 PPI. I think in a worst case senario, 5MP will force me to go to 100PPI or so.

MCAsan:
I have an old 400D which I'm using when I have to. But it can't stand to the weather like the 7D so I will not use it in the rain. I admit I lost a lot of good picture because my 7D stopped working, or it got misty because of humidity.

Regarding the 5D3, I hear only great things about it. I think I can live with 6FPS.

But the reasons I'm hesitating if its 1D4 vs 5D3, is because that I can use a 1.4 TC with my 400mm and get a 728mm distance (while I"m currently limited to 640mm, 400x1.6), and because with the lenses I have now, I don't see the advantage of the new double-cross points, which are limited from what I understand, to f/2.8 lenses. For the rest its normal cross-type, like the 1D4?

neilrohrbacker:
Regarding how much, 3800$ is the very max limit I will allow myself. There is no chance I will go for the 1DX at this time. Its way more than I need, and way too expensive. I would love to have one just for the kicks, but I seriously don't need such a beast. I don't work in photography as my main job, so I just can't justify buying one.

Jon_Doh:
Yeah I know :)
A 1D4 will force me to use my 400mm more to get the same as I do with my 300.
But it will also allow me to use the TC with the 400, and get a 728mm distance.
A 5D3 will be even worst, but it has much higher MP, which allows me to crop and still maintain a good image size.
But I don't think I'm not considering dropping it and keeping my 7D because of that.
Its a hard choice, and its a lot of money :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jul 29, 2012 09:22 |  #10

You a pro... you gonna make money at it? If not then keep the 7D and go shoot.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gotak
Senior Member
949 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jul 29, 2012 09:47 |  #11

If you have weather trouble I think a 1D is your only choice. The 5D3 is going to suffer the same issues as the 7D but it will be that much more expensive if it does fully kick the bucket one day.


http://bubble-trees.com/ (external link)
7D x2,, 50 f1.8, 11-16 f2.8, 17-55 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS II, 100 2.8L, 430EX, 580EX, Di866, pixel king wireless TTL trigger.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
p32shooter
Senior Member
713 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jul 29, 2012 12:19 |  #12

i have 40/50ds and 1d2n/1d3 - shoot the 40/50 in good weather and use the 1dwhaever in the rain/snow/slush/etc - happy both ways - you go 1d something you will need longer glass so include the cost of 500f4 is too


wants for Ls :D , now have 400do;500f4is,600f4 :cool::cool: off to birding and airshows:):):)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BugNyou
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Jul 2012
     
Jul 29, 2012 14:37 |  #13

gotak wrote in post #14785448 (external link)
If you have weather trouble I think a 1D is your only choice. The 5D3 is going to suffer the same issues as the 7D but it will be that much more expensive if it does fully kick the bucket one day.

The 5D3 doesn't have a better weather protection than the 7D?

Mostly the issues I had were more my fault. Shooting without good weather protection on the body, or changing lenses in the raid (yeah, I know its damn stupid, but I really wanted to take that shot... and yeah, I missed the shot).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gotak
Senior Member
949 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jul 29, 2012 14:50 |  #14

BugNyou wrote in post #14786374 (external link)
The 5D3 doesn't have a better weather protection than the 7D?

Mostly the issues I had were more my fault. Shooting without good weather protection on the body, or changing lenses in the raid (yeah, I know its damn stupid, but I really wanted to take that shot... and yeah, I missed the shot).

Not really. The only thing better is the lack of a pop up flash removing 1 one of the seams I believe. Otherwise it's not a weather sealed camera in the sense that you can leave it out in the rain for hours.

This is weather sealing on a 900 dollar body by Pentax.
http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=MYxtSOCOQLE (external link)

I have always envied Pentax and their commitment to weather sealing on their lower end bodies. Really think Canon's metal bodied DSLRs should be sealed to the same level.


http://bubble-trees.com/ (external link)
7D x2,, 50 f1.8, 11-16 f2.8, 17-55 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS II, 100 2.8L, 430EX, 580EX, Di866, pixel king wireless TTL trigger.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Jul 29, 2012 17:44 |  #15

BugNyou wrote in post #14785300 (external link)
A 1D4 will force me to use my 400mm more to get the same as I do with my 300.
But it will also allow me to use the TC with the 400, and get a 728mm distance.
A 5D3 will be even worst, but it has much higher MP, which allows me to crop and still maintain a good image size.

But not as good as what you'd get with the reach of the 1D4.

The pixel density of the 1D4 is such that if it were scaled to full frame size, it would have 27 megapixels, while the 5D3 has 22.


No, considering your needs, it seems to me that the 1D4 is the most logical choice for you: more pixels on target than the 5D3 and better weather sealing (all bets are off if you change lenses in the rain, though! :lol: ).


However, nothing gets you the pixels on target of your 7D, which would get you 46 megapixels if its sensor were scaled to full frame size.

If pixels on target are of greatest importance to you (and they seem to rank right up there!), then stick with the 7D, use a rain hood with it, and stop changing lenses in the rain without cover! :lol:


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,320 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Worth upgrading my 7D?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2790 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.