LittleMole Hatchling 5 posts Joined Aug 2012 More info | Aug 03, 2012 12:12 | #1 50mm f1.4 vs100mm f2.5 vs 200mm f1.4. What of those lenses should theoretically have nicer bokeh and more blurry background and foreground, if we consider that we must go 2 times farer from our subject with 100 and 4 times farer with 200, to get the same size of picture like with 50mm? Calculated DOF seems to be almost the same with all of those lenses, but i don't belive that the background blur is the same with all those lenses. Am I right?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2766 guests, 152 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
