Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 03 Aug 2012 (Friday) 23:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Does focus confim help with M42 lenses?

 
maverick75
Cream of the Crop
5,718 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 621
Joined May 2012
Location: Riverside,California
     
Aug 03, 2012 23:06 |  #1

I have the all manual one and I was just wondering if it's easier to focus with the one that has the chip that lets you use focus confirm?

On the film SLR I have no problem focusing, 9/10 shots are keepers focusing wise.
But it has a BIG viewfinder and a focusing screen.

On the 10D it's a pain in the a## to focus. My success rate is 5-10%.


- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Perfect_10
Goldmember
Avatar
1,998 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2004
Location: An Ex Brit living in Alberta, Canada
     
Aug 03, 2012 23:40 |  #2

maverick75 wrote in post #14812038 (external link)
I have the all manual one and I was just wondering if it's easier to focus with the one that has the chip that lets you use focus confirm?

On the film SLR I have no problem focusing, 9/10 shots are keepers focusing wise.
But it has a BIG viewfinder and a focusing screen.

On the 10D it's a pain in the a## to focus. My success rate is 5-10%.

I have the focus confirm version .. and yes it does help a lot. Just make sure it's calibrated correctly before you rely on it .. just like any other lens.


My Gear List  :p

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maverick75
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,718 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 621
Joined May 2012
Location: Riverside,California
     
Aug 04, 2012 00:11 |  #3

Thank you :D

ordering one of those right now!


- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,486 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 04, 2012 00:15 |  #4

dSLR standard focusing screens are optimized for viewfinder brightness, sacrificing precision of focus, simply because the half-silvered reflex mirror allows half the light to be diverted to the AF sensor in the base of the camera. So focus confirmation of any manually focused lens is improved by focus confirmation being active.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
melanopsin
Senior Member
278 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
Aug 04, 2012 00:29 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #5

With stock focus screen, lenses faster than f/2.8 cannot be accurately focused. (ref., Chuck Westfall)

The only way to get accurate focus using the viewfinder is to get a focus screen for fast lenses -- the best is Canon Ee-S for 5D or Eg-S for 5DII, cut to fit 10D, and shimmed for accuracy.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,486 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 04, 2012 01:02 |  #6

melanopsin wrote in post #14812237 (external link)
With stock focus screen, lenses faster than f/2.8 cannot be accurately focused. (ref., Chuck Westfall)

The only way to get accurate focus using the viewfinder is to get a focus screen for fast lenses -- the best is Canon Ee-S for 5D or Eg-S for 5DII, cut to fit 10D, and shimmed for accuracy.

It should be noted that there is a CFn in the 5D/5DII that adjusts metering to the EE-S/EG-S screens to restore metering accuracy; this would be lacking on the 10D, so the meter cannot always be trusted.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edfungus
Senior Member
269 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Flower Mound(Dallas), TX/Austin, TX
     
Aug 04, 2012 01:44 |  #7

Focus chips are also not always accurate so although you can shot a little more carefree, you will still have misses. I have kinda just resorted to practicing and using my eye to focus then my instinct to tell me if I should shoot one more or just review the picture.


Canon 5D | Rokinon 85mm 1.4 | Rokinon 35mm 1.4 | Yashica 50mm 1.7
Website (external link) | 500px (external link)
I do webdesign too! PM me if you are interested!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
killwilly
Senior Member
Avatar
866 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 58
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Lincolnshire, UK.
     
Aug 04, 2012 02:38 as a reply to  @ edfungus's post |  #8

I find my chipped M42 adapter works very well on all of my manual lenses up to about f8,after that there is no beep, or green light. I prefer to use live view and a tripod if I have the time.


Alan. flickr (external link)
---------------
Canon 7D. Canon 15-85 EF-S Lens. Canon 55-250 EF-S Lens. Speedlite 430ex 11.
Canon EOS-M. Canon 18-55 EF-M Lens. Speedlite 90EX.
Sigma APO 150-500mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TLN
Senior Member
284 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2009
     
Aug 04, 2012 02:47 |  #9

Focus confirm and focusing screen helps alot.
i say if you got crop body - go chipped.
If you have 5d or other ff - and you use bright lenses - f1.4 or something. or tele lens like 135 2.8 - you can be fine with focusing screen.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
3,515 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Australia
     
Aug 04, 2012 07:19 |  #10

Focus confirm adapter for a K-mount lens of mine works flawlessly. The adapter I got can be micro-adjusted via a series of very specific camera functions (even on non-MA bodies) , and it needed it, but now is very accurate.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lannes
Goldmember
Avatar
4,370 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Aug 04, 2012 07:20 |  #11

As others have mentioned, an AF confirm chip can be a waste of time if it's not calibrated, you might want to also look at a split image focusing screen for the 10d, but they are expensive.

http://www.focusingscr​een.com/index.php?cPat​h=21_39 (external link)

http://www.focusingscr​een.com/work/400den.ht​m (external link)


1Dx, 1DM4, 5DM2, 7D, EOS-M, 8-15L, 17-40L, 24 TSE II, 24-105L, 50L, 85L II, 100L, 135L, 200L f/2.8, 300L f/4, 70-200L II, 70-300L, 400Lf/5.6

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Aug 04, 2012 08:28 |  #12

I have an AF confirm adapter, but now I rarely use the function and just rely on my eye. I know its accurate, as I have calibrated it, its just faster to use my eye than to slowly tweak the focus ring until the dot flashes.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
killwilly
Senior Member
Avatar
866 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 58
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Lincolnshire, UK.
     
Aug 04, 2012 08:29 |  #13

lannes wrote in post #14812779 (external link)
As others have mentioned, an AF confirm chip can be a waste of time if it's not calibrated, you might want to also look at a split image focusing screen for the 10d, but they are expensive.

http://www.focusingscr​een.com/index.php?cPat​h=21_39 (external link)

http://www.focusingscr​een.com/work/400den.ht​m (external link)

My chipped adapter is one that can not be calibrated, but it works fine. I do agree that a split image focusing screen is the best option. I currently have a 450D and will be upgrading to a 60D by the end of the year. I shall then swap the screen in the 450D for a split screen.

When I use my T90, I really do notice a difference when focusing.:)


Alan. flickr (external link)
---------------
Canon 7D. Canon 15-85 EF-S Lens. Canon 55-250 EF-S Lens. Speedlite 430ex 11.
Canon EOS-M. Canon 18-55 EF-M Lens. Speedlite 90EX.
Sigma APO 150-500mm F5-6.3 DG OS HSM.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,486 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 04, 2012 09:12 |  #14

killwilly wrote in post #14812900 (external link)
My chipped adapter is one that can not be calibrated, but it works fine. I do agree that a split image focusing screen is the best option. I currently have a 450D and will be upgrading to a 60D by the end of the year. I shall then swap the screen in the 450D for a split screen.

When I use my T90, I really do notice a difference when focusing.:)

Again, a cautionary note for the OP and others, this time about aftermarket split image focus screens...

The metering accuracy is again affected by such screens, which lack CFn choices to restore metering accuracy. These screens are especially in error with Spot mode metering pattern, and have been shown to be 2-3 EV in error. Folks using Evaluative metering pattern are less affected by error than Spot users. And the degree of error is related to the max f/stop of the lens in use, so it is not simply a matter of cranking in a fixed amount of Exposure Compensation.

This recent post reflects the experiences of others, with regard to third party aftermarket focus screens https://photography-on-the.net …hp?p=14803638&p​ostcount=7


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maverick75
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,718 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 621
Joined May 2012
Location: Riverside,California
     
Aug 04, 2012 17:24 |  #15

Thanks guys, I'm just putting in more time to learn how to manually focus. I'm 23 so by the time I was old enough for a camera we already had decent point and shoots. So I never had to bother with using a MF camera. I kinda wish I did since it forces you to learn more, so now I'm getting more experience manually focusing.

Was practicing around with the neighbor's cat, what I'm doing now is clicking the shutter as soon as it looks in focus instead of just trying to dial it in right. I was watching a rangefinder video and the guy mentioned that, so far it seems to help with SLRs as well!

I'm also going to try to get a better lens, I bought this one on a impulse since everyone kept outbidding me on the Takumars :D

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7252/7713095834_636b71e24a_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/alexcorona/7713​095834/  (external link)

Also wish I remembered the rule of thirds :( , but I was just concerned about getting it focused.
Gigi (external link) by AlexxxCorona (external link), on Flickr

- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,399 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Does focus confim help with M42 lenses?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2766 guests, 152 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.