Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 08 Aug 2012 (Wednesday) 15:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 100mm 40mm issues need help

 
JM45ACP
Senior Member
Avatar
715 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 639
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Ct. USA
     
Aug 08, 2012 15:58 |  #1

I rented this lens to shoot some ospreys while on vacation.60D shooting off a tripod with a remote shutter release at mostly 400mm the nests are about 75 to 90 yards away in a marsh my focal point is on the head of the bird the lens seems to focusing correctly IS is off and I have tried different modes and settings Av Tv M but I cant seem to get a good clear picture. I am able to get good clear shots out to maybe 20yards or so at 400mm hand held. I was also able to get a good shot of the moon.I still have two more days.Is it that the bird is too small for the camera to focus on at this distance.any help advice comments appreciated
Thanks John
Here is an example

IMAGE: http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff461/JM45ACP/IMG_2751a-1.jpg

The Moon (my first try at this 24 pics later)
IMAGE: http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff461/JM45ACP/IMG_3226a-1.jpg

And here is one off hand no PP
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


5D MARK IV== 7D Mark II==7D == EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM == EF 100mm f/2.8LMacro==70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM == EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM UD == EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM==Speedlite 430 EX II PHOTO EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
T2i4me
Goldmember
Avatar
2,906 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Surf City, CA
     
Aug 08, 2012 16:46 |  #2

The first photo the birds appear they could be moving, what was the shutter speed? Were you using center point focus? Unless your subject is perfectly stationary at 400mm you need to use a high shutter speed to stop blur. The moon shot is soft as well, I use live view and manual focus when shooting the moon, try F8 1/200 on a tripod for that. The auto focus needs lots of contrast and light to perform well at 400mm so keep that in mind.

Try higher shutter speeds, nothing less than 1/500 and see if it improves for you. Don't be affraid to bump the ISO up. Also the lens is sharper around F8.


-- Eric --
6DMKII - 5DC - 80D - 70-200 F2.8 IS III - 100-400 L IS - 70-200 F4 L - 17-40 L - EF 85 1.8 - EF-S 10-22 - EF-S 15-85 IS - EF-S 18-135 USM IS - EF-S 60 macro - 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saint728
Goldmember
Avatar
2,892 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Honolulu Hawaii
     
Aug 08, 2012 16:55 |  #3

T2i4me wrote in post #14832249 (external link)
The first photo the birds appear they could be moving, what was the shutter speed? Were you using center point focus? Unless your subject is perfectly stationary at 400mm you need to use a high shutter speed to stop blur. The moon shot is soft as well, I use live view and manual focus when shooting the moon, try F8 1/200 on a tripod for that. The auto focus needs lots of contrast and light to perform well at 400mm so keep that in mind.

Try higher shutter speeds, nothing less than 1/500 and see if it improves for you. Don't be affraid to bump the ISO up. Also the lens is sharper around F8.

The first picture EXIF was Exposure:Auto (external link) exposure, 1/512 sec, f/5.6, ISO 400. Not sure what the problem is but from the looks of things it isn't a good picture. Looks like its too far away and is cropped too much, giving it the soft look?

Take Care,
Cheers, Patrick


Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
Click Here To See My Gear
Click here to see my Flickr (external link)
http://www.runryder.co​m/helicopter/gallery/9​019/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TSchrief
Goldmember
Avatar
2,099 posts
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Bourbon, Indiana
     
Aug 08, 2012 17:36 as a reply to  @ Saint728's post |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

I just ran outside and snapped a few of the dogs. Both are 60D, 100-400L @ 400mm & f/5.6, hand-held. Black dog is about 90 yards away. Tan dog is about 45 yards away. They are a tad noisy, SOOC at ISO 1600. Do you have a filter on that lens? My 100-400 does not work well with filters.
Edit: No cropping, full size images.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/08/2/LQ_609470.jpg
Image hosted by forum (609470) © TSchrief [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2012/08/2/LQ_609471.jpg
Image hosted by forum (609471) © TSchrief [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,403 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 525
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
     
Aug 08, 2012 17:59 |  #5

Were you using any filters? The 100-400L does not perform well with protective filters.

I get very sharp results with mine, handheld and wide open at 400mm. Here are a couple examples:

IMAGE: http://smerryfield.smugmug.com/Zoos/Detroit-Zoo-June-2012/i-SQmmWKG/0/XL/451A0574-XL.jpg

IMAGE: http://smerryfield.smugmug.com/Zoos/Detroit-Zoo-June-2012/i-BHFxftx/0/XL/451A0736-XL.jpg

Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JM45ACP
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
715 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 639
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Ct. USA
     
Aug 08, 2012 18:10 as a reply to  @ TSchrief's post |  #6

Thanks Ill try these settings tomorrow and see what I can do I am also going to bring my rangefinder to get a more accurate distance,
Ill also try the settings for the moon.

Do you have a filter on that lens?

No there is no filter just a hood

I get very sharp results with mine, handheld and wide open at 400mm. Here are a couple examples

Those are what I was hoping for how far away were they the seagull was hand held and around 20yards away maybe less

This is the uncropped image seems kind of far away where the dogs look like the lens zoomed in closer at about the same distance .

IMAGE: http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff461/JM45ACP/IMG_2751a.jpg
Thank
John


5D MARK IV== 7D Mark II==7D == EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM == EF 100mm f/2.8LMacro==70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM == EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM UD == EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM==Speedlite 430 EX II PHOTO EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TSchrief
Goldmember
Avatar
2,099 posts
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Bourbon, Indiana
     
Aug 08, 2012 18:34 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

Dog shots are both at 400mm and wide open. From looking at your full-size image, I would say you are a bit further than 90 yards from the birds. I downloaded the picture and had to blow it up to 400% to get the birds near as large as they are in your post. If what you are showing (first post) is a 400% crop, you are expecting way too much out of this lens.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JM45ACP
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
715 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 639
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Ct. USA
     
Aug 08, 2012 19:07 as a reply to  @ TSchrief's post |  #8

Dog shots are both at 400mm and wide open. From looking at your full-size image, I would say you are a bit further than 90 yards from the birds. I downloaded the picture and had to blow it up to 400% to get the birds near as large as they are in your post. If what you are showing (first post) is a 400% crop, you are expecting way too much out of this lens.

I think you might be right this is my first time with a real zoom and I am probably expecting too much from it at this distance. This is an awesome lens one I will someday own.I will crop less and see what happens.
Thanks for the help
John



5D MARK IV== 7D Mark II==7D == EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM == EF 100mm f/2.8LMacro==70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM == EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM UD == EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM==Speedlite 430 EX II PHOTO EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3433
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Aug 08, 2012 20:02 |  #9

you need to get closer even with a long lens...you're expecting a lot if you want razor sharp shots at that extreme of a crop...maybe rent the lens and a kayak :)


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TSchrief
Goldmember
Avatar
2,099 posts
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Bourbon, Indiana
     
Aug 08, 2012 20:18 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

DreDaze wrote in post #14832949 (external link)
you need to get closer even with a long lens...you're expecting a lot if you want razor sharp shots at that extreme of a crop...maybe rent the lens and a kayak :)

Good point! I think it was Ken Rockwell who said, The secret to great wildlife pictures is NOT a longer lens. It is sneaking up close enough to get a good shot with what you have. Or words to that effect.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,403 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 525
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
     
Aug 08, 2012 20:49 |  #11

JM45ACP wrote in post #14832598 (external link)
Those are what I was hoping for how far away were they the seagull was hand held and around 20yards away maybe less

This is the uncropped image seems kind of far away where the dogs look like the lens zoomed in closer at about the same distance .
QUOTED IMAGE
Thank
John

In my examples, the red panda is cropped to about half its original size, and the grizzly bears were not cropped at all.

You will not get razor sharp images if you crop as tight as your seagull shot, as you are lowering the resolution of the image substantially. The only solution is to either get closer or get more focal length.

Sometimes you just have to live with a less sharp image. The shot below was taken last summer in Yellowstone. I estimate the grizzly and her cub were about a half-mile away, and I had to crop the image substantially to get this enlargement. However, it is still a worthwhile shot, as I was able to capture the grizzly mother on her hind legs looking back at her cub.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JM45ACP
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
715 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 639
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Ct. USA
     
Aug 08, 2012 21:58 as a reply to  @ Scott M's post |  #12

maybe rent the lens and a kayak

I was going to buy a pair of waders but it's not legal to go into the salt marshes.:mrgreen:

you need to get closer even with a long lens

That just makes it all the more fun

You will not get razor sharp images if you crop as tight as your seagull shot

I actually didn't crop that one but I understand what you ate saying.I do have some that won't look to bad with less crop.

IMAGE: http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff461/JM45ACP/IMG_3097b.jpg

I like the bear picture a lot
Thanks John


5D MARK IV== 7D Mark II==7D == EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM == EF 100mm f/2.8LMacro==70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM == EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM UD == EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM==Speedlite 430 EX II PHOTO EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HyperCams
Goldmember
Avatar
1,465 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 64
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Melbourne Florida
     
Aug 09, 2012 13:48 |  #13

BTW, your moon shot is OOF too.. ;)


Brent Oliver
HyperCams & Mods (external link)/Oliver Digital Images
My Flickr (external link)
Feedback and Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsmotril
Goldmember
Avatar
2,543 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 402
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Austin TX
     
Aug 09, 2012 14:33 |  #14

Try using live view contrast detect focus and see if it is any sharper that way. If it is, the AF microadjust might be needed.


Gear List
Galleries: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/smopho/ (external link) --- http://billsmotrilla.z​enfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JM45ACP
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
715 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 639
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Ct. USA
     
Aug 10, 2012 19:58 as a reply to  @ bsmotril's post |  #15

I tried shooting at 1/200 t0 1/250 f8 ISO 100 to 200 at closer subjects 30 to 50 feet away still getting the same quality.I tried my 18mm 135mm and I can get pretty clear shots.
This is one I took at about 50 feet with the 100mm 400mm on a tripod.

IMAGE: http://i1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff461/JM45ACP/IMG_3698a.jpg

Try using live view contrast detect focus and see if it is sharper that way. If it is, the AF microadjust might be needed.

Unfortunately the 60D does not have this feature

Thanks
John



5D MARK IV== 7D Mark II==7D == EF 24-105mm f4L IS USM == EF 100mm f/2.8LMacro==70-200mm f2.8L IS II USM == EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM UD == EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM==Speedlite 430 EX II PHOTO EDITING OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,311 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Canon 100mm 40mm issues need help
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2693 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.