You guys are going to lol at me... I just recieved my prints for school for art lab and I forgot to take my watermark off in 3 of the photos
Luckily they were only $2 each.
Nice.

*sigh* Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:05 | #8836 laxlife1234 wrote in post #14987554 You guys are going to lol at me... I just recieved my prints for school for art lab and I forgot to take my watermark off in 3 of the photos Luckily they were only $2 each.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:05 | #8837 *sigh* wrote in post #14987363 I listened! ![]() I love mine... though I need to start using it a bit more often. Heck I got work to let me buy one for the 5D kit we have. ![]() It's easy to make a profile in LR. You just have to figure it out yourself.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:08 | #8838 dgrPhotos wrote in post #14987569 When was the PS G15 announced? http://www.canonpricewatch.com …-PowerShot-G15-price.html It hasn't been. The last PowerShots announced were the SX160 and SX500. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dgrPhotos Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:10 | #8839 Jon wrote in post #14987591 It hasn't been. The last PowerShots announced were the SX160 and SX500. CPW is jumping the gun then.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
*sigh* Hardware Master (or something like that) 25,131 posts Likes: 45 Joined Feb 2011 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:13 | #8840 jdizzle wrote in post #14987580 It's easy to make a profile in LR. You just have to figure it out yourself. ![]() Oh I'm sure it is. Normally I just use the default settings for the profile, but tweaking it for a different look can't be too difficult.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop 12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:13 | #8841 themadman wrote in post #14987568 ... Why do you use jpegs with watermarks for printing? I printed the wrong pictures.. I have 2 pictures, 1 without and 1 with the watermar.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DTBaan "The title fairy does not exist" More info |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop 12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:44 | #8843 DTBaan wrote in post #14987693 very impressive. https://photography-on-the.net …?p=14985068&postcount=168 Like I said... 24-70II is probably the sharpest lens Canon has to offer now
LOG IN TO REPLY |
iLvision Cream of the Crop 5,766 posts Joined Oct 2011 Location: Western pot hole city, Massachusetts More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:46 | #8844 Permanent banDTBaan wrote in post #14987693 very impressive. https://photography-on-the.net …?p=14985068&postcount=168 Dang... Ilya | Gear |•• flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop 12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:48 | #8845 Not at all. That's too expensive? saying the guy paying $300+ for headponhes?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:49 | #8846 DTBaan wrote in post #14987693 very impressive. https://photography-on-the.net …?p=14985068&postcount=168 Meh. Zeiss kicks butt!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dgrPhotos Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:50 | #8847 laxlife1234 wrote in post #14987715 Not at all. That's too expensive? saying the guy paying $300+ for headponhes? ![]() The fact that it's sharper than an $2k+ lens makes it well worth the price. I see it as the equivalent price of the Tamron 24-70 VC + 135/2L.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink 69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:51 | #8848 laxlife1234 wrote in post #14987715 Not at all. That's too expensive? saying the guy paying $300+ for headponhes? ![]() The fact that it's sharper than an $2k+ lens makes it well worth the price. I'd buy it if I needed that zoom but, I'm not even using my 24-70 G.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DTBaan "The title fairy does not exist" More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:51 | #8849 ... you just bought 2 $500 buds.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
iLvision Cream of the Crop 5,766 posts Joined Oct 2011 Location: Western pot hole city, Massachusetts More info | Sep 13, 2012 18:51 | #8850 Permanent banlaxlife1234 wrote in post #14987715 Not at all. That's too expensive? saying the guy paying $300+ for headponhes? ![]() The fact that it's sharper than an $2k+ lens makes it well worth the price. Actually I've spent $1,077 on headphones Ilya | Gear |•• flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 976 guests, 102 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||