Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 10 Aug 2012 (Friday) 03:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why get a prime wide angle?

 
Evandot
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Aug 10, 2012 03:39 |  #1

Hi everyone I'm an amateur so please tips and criticism would help. I'm wondering why you would need a prime wide angle lens? When shooting landscape I thought that you don't need large aperture and isn't that the main reason for a prime lens? If more light is needed then a tripod would surely fix the problem so again why a prime wide angle lens? A zoom sounds a lot more handy in this situation.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TLN
Senior Member
284 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2009
     
Aug 10, 2012 03:45 |  #2

Primes is all about the quality.
And it's harder to get a better quality on the edge on a wide angle.
You can find tele zoom lens that're compatible with the primes, i believe, but you cannot find a wide angle zoom that compatible with wide angle prime lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Evandot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Aug 10, 2012 03:49 |  #3

I see so although the setting options may be the same the quality is still superior.. what do you mean edge on a wide angle? and what do you mean compatible are you saying as good as?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cfvisuals
Senior Member
866 posts
Joined Mar 2011
Location: San Diego
     
Aug 10, 2012 04:00 |  #4

You don't have to use wide angle lens for landscape. Its application is limitless. I like wide-angle portrait, full body type, it's very interesting.
Large aperture wide angle works for night-street photography.

Plus there's no wide-angle zoom tilt shift lenses.


flickr (external link)
5∞ portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eyal
Senior Member
569 posts
Joined May 2011
     
Aug 10, 2012 04:06 |  #5

Usually a prime will give better quality at the edge of the image, while on wide zooms the edge will sometimes be a bit smudgy.

And compatible I think me means that you have a 16-35 lens as a zoom, and there are 24,28,35 primes.
The L versions will give superior image quality compared on the same length and aperture.
For example the 24 at F/2.8 will give much better quality than the 16-35 at 24 and wide open at F/2.8.

The primes in this way will allow a photographer to get the almost max image quality at wide open, which means more light and lower ISO compared to the zooms, where you have to stop down for better quality, and it means less light = higher ISO if you need to keep the same shutter speeds.


5DMarkIII+Grip | Extender 1.4x III / 2x III
16-35mm F/2.8L II | 24-70mm F/2.8L II | 70-200mm F/2.8L IS II
Σ 50mm F/1.4 | 85mm F/1.2L II | 100mm F/2.8L IS Macro | 135mm F/2L | 300mm F/2.8L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Evandot
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Aug 10, 2012 04:30 as a reply to  @ Eyal's post |  #6

Thanks for clearing up




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
viktorsundberg
Member
218 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Sweden
     
Aug 10, 2012 05:57 |  #7

I use the TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II lens for landscapes nowadays. Mainly because it is super sharp all over. Sure, the Tilt and Shift can be fun to play around with or maybe create a panorama with 60+ MP, but the sharpness just blows you away. There is virtually no CA either. It is truly amazing. Sure, you don't always get exactly the right crop without a zoom and you have to move around more to find the right spot. But you also become less lazy and more meticulous when you compose because of this. There are ok zooms (I have the 16-35 II as well), but there are no zooms as good as the best primes.


5D mk III | TS-E 17 f/4L | 50 f/1.4 | 70-200 f/2.8L IS II | 100 f/2.8L Macro IS | 300 f/2.8L IS | 600 f/4L IS II | 1.4x III | 2x III | Gitzo tripods | RRS ballheads | Wimberley gimbal
Photographer and author from Sweden. Teacher at Canon and organizer of independent workshops. Visit my website: www.viktorsundberg.se (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,639 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Why get a prime wide angle?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2693 guests, 146 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.