Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 11 Aug 2012 (Saturday) 15:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Home Printer

 
alisaconn
Member
104 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Oct 2007
     
Aug 11, 2012 15:06 |  #1

Canon anyone recommend a good home printer. Wont print anything bigger then 8x10 mostly 4x6.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Aug 11, 2012 16:12 |  #2

alisaconn wrote in post #14845083 (external link)
Canon anyone recommend a good home printer. Wont print anything bigger then 8x10 mostly 4x6.

Ha ha were you thinking of Canon?

What are you looking to do with it? Print pictures or just documents? Do you need color? "Home printer" can mean a lot of things.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 11, 2012 17:14 |  #3

The three main brands are Canon, Epson and HP. They each have plenty of satisfied customers, although naturally you will also see some dis-satified customers with each of them as well.

If you want a dedicated photo printer you'd probably find more options with Epson and Canon. Just be aware of the fact that a whole lot of Research and Development has gone into photo printing, with an empasis on inks and paper, and the costs, especially with photo-dedicated inks, are considerable.

Some folks are quite pleased with a more general-purpose printer, such as an "all-in-one" copier/scanner/printer​, assuming that it has "decent" photo printing capabilities. That type of printer is generally pretty inexpensive and uses less "demanding" inks.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Aug 11, 2012 18:21 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #4

Ok Tony, can you recommend a specific in each of the 2 categories?


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 11, 2012 20:34 |  #5

KirkS518 wrote in post #14845636 (external link)
Ok Tony, can you recommend a specific in each of the 2 categories?

I really can't, sorry! I have three printers, all HP, all from my years working at HP, none of them newer than 6 years old (when I left the company). I haven't looked at newer models from any of the major brands!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Aug 11, 2012 20:53 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #6

Is there anyone in Cascade Park that doesn't or didn't work at HP? :)


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 11, 2012 21:01 |  #7

KirkS518 wrote in post #14846163 (external link)
Is there anyone in Cascade Park that doesn't or didn't work at HP? :)

Heh! There were a few of us that worked there, but Cascade Park is a "gateway" to a lot of tech places going east and north, although HP was, I believe, an early one during that "growth" period. I believe that when I started there in around '91 it was already employing about 2,000 people.

Those were pretty exciting times -- HP was leading the way in the "Inkjet Revolution" and was also deeply entrenched in the "brave new" Internet world, while the World Wide Web was still just a university project in Switzerland!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ of ­ Cornubia
Senior Member
459 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Oztralia
     
Aug 11, 2012 21:03 |  #8

I recently bought a Canon MG5350 and it's great. Print quality is very good (A4 only) and I can print directly onto DVDs, which was one of the reasons I chose it.


5D MK3, 7D, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 16-35mm f/2.8L, EF 1.4x TC MKIII, Nissin Di866 II, Nissin Di466
I hate being bipolar. It's great.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rainyday
Goldmember
Avatar
1,291 posts
Gallery: 53 photos
Likes: 792
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Texas, USA
     
Aug 12, 2012 13:24 as a reply to  @ Steve of Cornubia's post |  #9

I have a Canon iP6310D and it's fine. It was very inexpensive and prints reasonably well. For fancy stuff, I have it printed professionally.

What drives me nuts is buying ink and cartridges. I always have a dickens of a time finding the exact cartridges I want. You'd think manufacturers could get together and create one standard but noooo....:mad:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Aug 12, 2012 13:33 as a reply to  @ Rainyday's post |  #10

Anyone have/know the HP Phtotosmart 8750?


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShotByTom
Goldmember
Avatar
3,050 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 136
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Indianapolis
     
Aug 12, 2012 15:25 |  #11

I use two printers and would highly recommend both. First, for the best quality photo prints I use the Canon Pixma Pro 9000 Mk II (available HERE (external link) as a matter of fact!!) And for general printing with excellent quality photo prints I use the Epson Artisan 835 (external link)(Epson 837 Now).


Gear
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jack880
Goldmember
Avatar
2,852 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 794
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Manchester, UK
     
Aug 12, 2012 18:57 |  #12

I have a canon ip3600 which only cost about £60 and produces amazing quality prints.

I've got an HP black and white laser which has just started going wrong just outside its warranty period so i'd avoid HP!


https://www.flickr.com​/photos/jackhenriques/ (external link)
1DX, 7D, 20D, G7X II, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 24-70 f/2.8 L, 16-35 f/2.8 L II, 50 f/1.8 II, 50 f/1.4, TS-E 17 f/4 L, 8-15 f/4 L, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8, Sigma 8-16 f/4.5-5.6, Sigma 150 f/2.8 macro, x1.4 extender II, Kenko extension tubes, 430 EX II x 2, DJI Mavic Air

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,909 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Home Printer
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1522 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.