Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 13 Aug 2012 (Monday) 16:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Do I need to sharpen twice?

 
cubsfan1032
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Aug 13, 2012 16:58 |  #1

I take shots in RAW then process in DPP which invariably involves sharpening the image further before converting and saving as a jpeg. However when i look at the new jpeg I note that the changes to the sharpening dont appear to be saved as the slider is all the way to the left. Before finally transferring the image to a disc for printing do i need to go back to the jpeg and resharpen it or is the sharpen really there still when it comes to viewing or printing the images on the disc?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 13, 2012 17:17 |  #2

DPP applies "capture sharpening"/"input sharpening" to the Raw data the same as the camera would apply if you are shooting jpegs.

Whether or not an image "needs" another sharpening process is largely up to personal preference, with consideration for the specific image and the desired output.

For a lot of shots, ones that I want to make a quick conversion and post to my Web host, I don't typically fuss with going beyond the input sharpening. If it looks good viewing at a "normal" viewing size, I'm content.

But if say I'm preparing a shot to print at a large "framing" size, well, I'll give more thought and effort to sharpening considerations. If, say, I'm preparing an image to print at my typical 12x18 size, I'll look at the image in it's "print size", which will fill my screen (horizontally) and that way I can get a look at what it might need as far as sharpening. If I need to go farther than the Raw, say for resizing and resampling the image to get a resolution of 300ppi, then I'll do that first before "output sharpening".

Another consideration for certain shots is "selective sharpening". For example, if I have a shot of a critter I'll often want a "final output" to have sharpening applied only to the critter, with the background remaining softer. DPP can't do this, but an image editor with layers and masks can make this operation fairly straightforward. Lightroom makes this doable as well.

If I do need to go into an image editor I'd typically convert the image to a tiff for this to avoid repetitive jpeg compression. In DPP you can use the Tools/Transfer to Photoshop if you have Photoshop.

If you don't have an image editor, well, get one -- Photoshop Elements is capable of doing all types of tasks at an affordable price.

For DPP only, you can't do the selective sharpening, but you could Convert and Save as a tiff, you can resize to your intended final use, and then apply sharpening at your intended viewing size. As you've noted, once you have converted from your Raw format, you are limited to your RGB controls and are beyond "input sharpening". The Sharpening control in the RGB tab will add to the effects of the input sharpening in the Raw tab.

Again, your output sharpening should be use/view purposes. Input sharpening is best viewed at a 100% view. It may (or may not) affect the shot viewed at the "normal" size. Again, the normal view is best for output sharpening.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Aug 13, 2012 18:15 |  #3

No need to redo the adjustments; all of the adjustments you made to the raw file are included in the jpeg conversion.

Think of the adjustments made in dpp as a reciepe for creating a jpeg.


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doidinho
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Kenmore, Washington
     
Aug 13, 2012 18:16 |  #4

Sorry about the multiple posts; iPhone w a bad signal.


Robert McCadden
My Flickr (external link)
MM (external link)
5DMKII, Rebel xti, 24-105 f/4L, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 17-40.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cubsfan1032
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Aug 2012
     
Aug 14, 2012 13:21 |  #5

Thanks very much, as i am doing processing on several hundred pics from a wedding i need to keep it in DPP, I really dont like photoshop and want to keep things as efficient as possible.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Aug 15, 2012 05:10 as a reply to  @ cubsfan1032's post |  #6

I avoid using DPP for sharpening as I have a better third party photoshop plug-in.

But even so I use a 3 stage approach, with a gentle "capture" sharpen immediately, then whatever "creative" sharpening I feel the image might need before a final "pre-print" sharpen based on the ppi number of the print. This 3 stage system would stay in place even if I allowed DPP to do the first sharpen.

Good as DPP is as a RAW converter, it does not give me the flexibility I need, for this I much prefer Photoshop.

If time is tight, this can be automated into one or more actions provided your images are similar.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Aug 15, 2012 17:53 |  #7

If you want to know about sharpening search for Bruce Frasier. He and several others have done extensive research and, based on that research developed a Photoshop Sharpening Plug-in call PhotoKit Sharpener. The company is Pixel Genius.

The algorithms they developed for input and output sharpening have been licensed by Adobe and included in Lightroom 3 and 4. Essentially its a three step process, input sharpening to overcome the inherent softness the anti-aliesing filter causes, creative sharpening and then output sharpening based on image size, paper type or if for computer use.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Aug 16, 2012 03:23 |  #8

dmward wrote in post #14863288 (external link)
If you want to know about sharpening search for Bruce Frasier. He and several others have done extensive research and, based on that research developed a Photoshop Sharpening Plug-in call PhotoKit Sharpener. The company is Pixel Genius.

The algorithms they developed for input and output sharpening have been licensed by Adobe and included in Lightroom 3 and 4. Essentially its a three step process, input sharpening to overcome the inherent softness the anti-aliesing filter causes, creative sharpening and then output sharpening based on image size, paper type or if for computer use.

And thats my "third party plug-in". It really is an excellent piece of kit.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,969 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Do I need to sharpen twice?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is josetide
996 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.