Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions 
Thread started 14 Aug 2012 (Tuesday) 15:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Fearless prediction: A new 16-35L III by the end of the Year

 
andrikos
Goldmember
Avatar
1,905 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
     
Aug 14, 2012 15:44 |  #1

So I was working on the Excel spreadsheet for the thread in my signature and I saw an extremely interesting trend...

The Canon UWA Zoom in all its variations since the FD days in the '70s has been updated every 5-6 years like clockwork:

FD -> new FD = 6.2 years
new FD -> EF = 5.5 years
EF -> EF USM = 6.5 years
17-35 -> 16-35 = 5.7 years
16-35 -> 16-35 II = 5.3 years

As of today (August 2012) we are 5.4 years from the release of the 16-35L II

If history is any indication here (and it looks strong) expect a new 16-35L III to be released by the end of the year.

Also, given the pricing history of the lens (230,000 Yen same as the 24-70L II) I expect it to remain the same for the new model.
Of course, given the crappy exchange rate for the USD, expect the US price to be around the same as that of the 24-70L II ($2,300)

To summarize:
Release date: by Dec 2012
Price: 230,000 Yen or $2,300.


You heard it here first! ;)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
boingy
Goldmember
1,052 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Aug 14, 2012 21:50 |  #2

or they may come out with a 14-24 f/2.8L that will take filters! :p


Flickr (external link)
Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,567 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Aug 14, 2012 22:06 |  #3

I've already seen rumor of 14-24 f2.8 coming soon.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
60D | ELPH 330 | iPhone 5s

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,805 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 395
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Aug 14, 2012 22:28 |  #4

We've all seen that rumour for years. I'm not holding my breath.

But a corner-to-corner sharp, distortion-free 14-24 with no purple fringing would be a godsend.

Even if it were a smaller lens and f/4 rather than f/2.8 so that it would be able to take regular-sized filters rather than super-sized ones.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrikos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,905 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
     
Aug 15, 2012 01:36 |  #5

So, you are all suggesting that the 16-35 will be replaced by the 14-24?
Interesting...

Nikon has both and I'm sure Canon will have both also if they (hopefully) release a 14-24. And f/4 makes a lot of sense too to keep costs down.

But that will be independent of the 16-35 release in my opinion.
Maybe they'll release both by the end of the year? :)


Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,567 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Aug 15, 2012 02:13 |  #6

Maybe they will keep both, but I don't know about a NEW 16-35. I could see them kicking the 16-35 II down the road like they have the non-IS 70-200L's.

If they can make a 14-24 that does filters, then there wouldn't be much need for both.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
60D | ELPH 330 | iPhone 5s

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Shadowblade
Cream of the Crop
5,805 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 395
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Aug 15, 2012 02:47 |  #7

andrikos wrote in post #14860465 (external link)
So, you are all suggesting that the 16-35 will be replaced by the 14-24?
Interesting...

Nikon has both and I'm sure Canon will have both also if they (hopefully) release a 14-24. And f/4 makes a lot of sense too to keep costs down.

But that will be independent of the 16-35 release in my opinion.
Maybe they'll release both by the end of the year? :)

Not replaced.

A 14-24 and a 16-35 serve very different purposes, and are likely to be used by very different types of photographers.

A 14-24 is a specialised lens, likely to be used by landscape photographers and artistic types to achieve effects which can't be done using longer lenses. Corner-to-corner sharpness on high-resolution sensors (looking to future 50MP-or-higher sensors), minimal distortion and minimal chromatic aberration are paramount. Focus speed, etc. is not. Even f/2.8 may not be essential, although it is nice to have when shooting landscapes at night.

A 16-35 is a photojournalist's lens. Focus speed and central sharpness is vital. F/2.8 or don't bother. Corner sharpness and distortion don't matter so much. Due to its less stringent optical design requirements, it is likely to be much cheaper than a 14-24.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrikos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,905 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
     
Aug 15, 2012 03:00 |  #8

Shadowblade wrote in post #14860556 (external link)
Not replaced.

A 14-24 and a 16-35 serve very different purposes, and are likely to be used by very different types of photographers.

A 14-24 is a specialised lens, likely to be used by landscape photographers and artistic types to achieve effects which can't be done using longer lenses. Corner-to-corner sharpness on high-resolution sensors (looking to future 50MP-or-higher sensors), minimal distortion and minimal chromatic aberration are paramount. Focus speed, etc. is not. Even f/2.8 may not be essential, although it is nice to have when shooting landscapes at night.

A 16-35 is a photojournalist's lens. Focus speed and central sharpness is vital. F/2.8 or don't bother. Corner sharpness and distortion don't matter so much. Due to its less stringent optical design requirements, it is likely to be much cheaper than a 14-24.

Excellent explanation Shadowblade.
Now I can see why landscapists are clamoring for a 14-24 and don't find the 16-35 to perfectly suit them.

Given that journalism is a waning profession, I wonder how that affected the sales of a photojournalist's UWA lens... Maybe that will slow down the update as tkbslc has suggested...


Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,688 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 6633
Joined Aug 2010
Location: West Point, Georgia
     
Aug 15, 2012 20:48 |  #9

Shadowblade wrote in post #14860556 (external link)
Not replaced.

A 14-24 and a 16-35 serve very different purposes, and are likely to be used by very different types of photographers.

A 14-24 is a specialised lens, likely to be used by landscape photographers and artistic types to achieve effects which can't be done using longer lenses. Corner-to-corner sharpness on high-resolution sensors (looking to future 50MP-or-higher sensors), minimal distortion and minimal chromatic aberration are paramount. Focus speed, etc. is not. Even f/2.8 may not be essential, although it is nice to have when shooting landscapes at night.

A 16-35 is a photojournalist's lens. Focus speed and central sharpness is vital. F/2.8 or don't bother. Corner sharpness and distortion don't matter so much. Due to its less stringent optical design requirements, it is likely to be much cheaper than a 14-24.

Shadowblade, I enjoy reading your thoughts about lenses. And I agree: a corner-to-corner ultra-sharp well-corrected 14-24mm f/4 would be ideal in a lot of ways. I suspect we're just going to get a Canonized Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8, though. In any case, it will likely be better/sharper than the Nikon out of the necessity you referenced: upcoming 50MP+ cameras. Speaking of which, I hope a high MP camera gets announced sooner rather than later.

Congrats Andrikos on this thread being today's news on CanonRumors.com. It's a little role reversal as usually anything posted on Canon Rumors gets parroted here at POTN multiple times! ;)


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony α7R II | CV 12mm, Loxia 21mm, Loxia 35mm, FE 35mm F1.4, Batis 85mm, Batis 135mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nuffi
Senior Member
926 posts
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 15, 2012 23:32 |  #10

andrikos wrote in post #14860566 (external link)
Excellent explanation Shadowblade.
Now I can see why landscapists are clamoring for a 14-24 and don't find the 16-35 to perfectly suit them.

Given that journalism is a waning profession, I wonder how that affected the sales of a photojournalist's UWA lens... Maybe that will slow down the update as tkbslc has suggested...


Journalism isn't a waning profession really; it's just print media that's dying.

Journalistic photograpy will be going as strong as ever.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smorter
Goldmember
Avatar
4,506 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Aug 16, 2012 02:37 |  #11

You guys are famous you made Canonrumors.com!


Wedding Photography Melbourneexternal link
Reviews: 85LII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrikos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,905 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
     
Aug 16, 2012 02:37 |  #12

David Arbogast wrote in post #14863939 (external link)
Congrats Andrikos on this thread being today's news on CanonRumors.com. It's a little role reversal as usually anything posted on Canon Rumors gets parroted here at POTN multiple times! ;)

smorter wrote in post #14864880 (external link)
You guys are famous you made Canonrumors.com!

:lol:
Haha, that's pretty funny. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
I'm going to link it here so we can create a post-apocalyptic infinite loop that will short circuit the internet and send us back to the dark ages! :D

http://www.canonrumors​.com …-zoom-discussion-opinion/ (external link)


Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
andrikos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,905 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
     
Aug 16, 2012 02:44 |  #13

nuffi wrote in post #14864459 (external link)
Journalism isn't a waning profession really; it's just print media that's dying.

Journalistic photograpy will be going as strong as ever.

I hope you are right, I don't pretend to know much about it. Print media is dead as we all know, hopefully photojournalism will not follow suit while being replaced by a bunch of hipster paparazzi armed with iPhones! ;)


Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 29
Joined Jun 2008
     
Aug 22, 2012 12:10 |  #14

andrikos wrote in post #14864881 (external link)
:lol:
Haha, that's pretty funny. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
I'm going to link it here so we can create a post-apocalyptic infinite loop that will short circuit the internet and send us back to the dark ages! :D

http://www.canonrumors​.com …-zoom-discussion-opinion/ (external link)

rumors feeding on rumors - it is an infinite loop !




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
w0m
Goldmember
1,109 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2011
     
Aug 25, 2012 23:26 |  #15

One of the most interesting things about the OP chart; how little lens pricing has changed over the years. o.0


[6D]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

7,000 views & 0 likes for this thread
Fearless prediction: A new 16-35L III by the end of the Year
FORUMS News & Rumors Lens Rumors and Predictions 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is arejayphotography
807 guests, 251 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.