genewch Senior Member 360 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Hong Kong More info | rklepper wrote: Oh, and the 200 f2.8 L is also costs much less than either of the 70-200 f2.8's. I already have the 135mm. Is it worthwhile to buy a 200mm + 85mm to substitute a 70-200mm (expensive and heavy!)?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 25, 2005 05:12 | #17 Thanks for all the submission photos. I was actually pleased with the difference in 135mm and 200mm; I had expected less of a difference. Digital Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1995 guests, 126 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
