Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 15 Aug 2012 (Wednesday) 15:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need VS. Want

 
tbsguy18
Member
Avatar
230 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2012
Location: Michigan
     
Aug 15, 2012 15:20 |  #1

About 5 months ago I kept telling myself, "I need another lens". At the time, I couldn't come up with a reason why...
This week I finally got my credit card paid off, I'm caught up on bills, and I'm pretty much debt free! So I figured that this would be the time to buy that lens that I "needed" 5 months ago. It's nothing special, just a 55-250mm f 4/5.6, but since the most reach I have right now is my 85mm I figured it couldn't hurt. When it came time to click "Buy It Now", I hesitated. Did I really need this, or did I simply WANT it? I've gotten by just fine with what I have so far, and never have found myself wishing I had the extra reach. But at only about $200 it's not going to break the bank. Maybe I should just pull the trigger and buy it?

I'm sure lots of people are always on the fence about this stuff, just wondering what anyones thoughts are.


Gripped Canon 60D 50 f/1.8---17-50 f/2.8---70-200 f/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidR
Goldmember
1,544 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 61
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Titusville, Florida
     
Aug 15, 2012 15:34 |  #2

If you want it and can afford it, click the button. :D


Sony a9II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Aug 15, 2012 15:38 |  #3

There are numerous ways you can measure this, but it comes down to whether you value it more than the cash you would spend on it. The lucky part is most of the better lenses can be sold at little loss if you decide to covert them back to cash later.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
onona
Senior Member
Avatar
511 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
     
Aug 15, 2012 16:16 |  #4

Go for it, treat yourself. That's actually a surprisingly nice lens considering how cheap it is. I used to have one when I shot on a crop body, and I actually really miss it as it was really reliable, as well as being pretty compact and light.


Leigh
I shoot concerts and stuff. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jetcode
Cream of the Crop
6,235 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2009
Location: West Marin
     
Aug 15, 2012 17:29 |  #5
bannedPermanently

Congratulations you faced the "magic silver bullet syndrome" head on and negotiated control.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Aug 15, 2012 17:35 |  #6

All my toys/hobbies are wants. If I want something and I can afford it, I buy it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
recrisp
Goldmember
Avatar
2,792 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 4104
Joined May 2008
Location: Paris, Texas
     
Aug 15, 2012 18:05 as a reply to  @ crn3371's post |  #7

It's not much, when you think about it, and it's a pretty good lens too. I had one a few years ago, I bought it new, I liked it, then I needed more reach, (for birds) so I sold it. Although I didn't regret selling, it was exactly what they say it is, a "Nifty-250", you can't beat it at that price, for what it is.
I now have another that I got in a deal when I bought a camera, I'll end up selling it probably, but not because I don't like it.

One thing, if you have the actual 'cash', go to Craigslist, I see them here locally (Dallas, Tx) going at $130.-$150. pretty regularly. People buy them in a kit, and Don't need them, so they get rid of them. That'd be a really easy way to save enough to make you feel as though you don't have buyer's remorse... heheh

Randy


Gear List
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjx
Goldmember
Avatar
2,670 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Santa Clara, California
     
Aug 15, 2012 18:38 |  #8

First, I applaud you for being cautious. IMO more photographers should be. Yes, it's fun and exciting to get new gear but I wonder how many people have actually mastered what they already have? I wonder how many people actually know the ins and outs of the gear they have before buying more gear which will shift their focus from the old to new. I think it's refreshing on this site, and other sites ALL OVER THE NET when I see someone put real thought into it.

Instead of buying more gear, you could use that money to become a stronger photographer by attending a workshop or a local photography course, or paying for content on creativelive.com, kelbytraining.com, or Lynda.com. You could get some great books, or go on a site like craftandvision.com and buy a ton of inexpensive ebooks.

You could put the gear you have to use and plan an inexpensive 2 day photo trip. A trip where the sole purpose is to photograph a location or area of interest. $200 will buy cheap round trip airfare and a cheap hotel somewhere near by.


tbsguy18 wrote in post #14862648 (external link)
Did I really need this, or did I simply WANT it?

never have found myself wishing I had the extra reach.

The two quotes above tell me you definitely don't need it. If you needed it, you would know. You said you "never" wished for the extra reach.

My recommendation is to put that money towards something you will benefit from. What that is, only you know. Or you could just enjoy what you have and save more money for something bigger in the future.


"It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
“Photos are everywhere. You just have to know how to look.”

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eight_Blade
Senior Member
524 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jul 2012
Location: GOP
     
Aug 15, 2012 18:53 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

This is America. We don't need 90% of the things we have.


flickr (external link)
Why are there so many dumb people in this world?

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Aug 15, 2012 19:05 |  #10

If your actual needs are covered (bills, food, etc), it isn't terrible to treat yourself to things you want. I'd also like to say congratulations on holding out and not getting into the self-inflicted mire of buy/sell due to buyer's remorse that so many appear to.


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjx
Goldmember
Avatar
2,670 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Santa Clara, California
     
Aug 15, 2012 19:16 |  #11

Based on what I know, I'm confident he doesn't need it. But I wonder if he even wants it, or if he just thinks he might. How could he want a lens that offers a range he never wished he had to begin with?


"It doesn't matter what camera you have if your photography has nothing worthwhile to say"
“Photos are everywhere. You just have to know how to look.”

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goldboughtrue
Goldmember
1,857 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
     
Aug 15, 2012 19:55 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

You said you just paid off all your bills. Can you afford that lens and still keep up on all your bills? If not, I wouldn't buy it. You don't present a good argument for buying it other than you just want to. Is there something else you have your eye on and can save that $200 for it?


http://www.pbase.com/g​oldbough (external link)

5D II, Canon 100 macro, Canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 24-105 L, Canon TS-E 45, Sigma Art 35mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Aug 15, 2012 20:00 |  #13

tbsguy18 wrote in post #14862648 (external link)
About 5 months ago I kept telling myself, "I need another lens". At the time, I couldn't come up with a reason why...
This week I finally got my credit card paid off, I'm caught up on bills, and I'm pretty much debt free! So I figured that this would be the time to buy that lens that I "needed" 5 months ago. It's nothing special, just a 55-250mm f 4/5.6, but since the most reach I have right now is my 85mm I figured it couldn't hurt. When it came time to click "Buy It Now", I hesitated. Did I really need this, or did I simply WANT it? I've gotten by just fine with what I have so far, and never have found myself wishing I had the extra reach. But at only about $200 it's not going to break the bank. Maybe I should just pull the trigger and buy it?

I'm sure lots of people are always on the fence about this stuff, just wondering what anyones thoughts are.



Dont do it.


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,153 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 511
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
     
Aug 15, 2012 20:11 |  #14

No wonder many very high incomers penniless into their retirement ;)


Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tbsguy18
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
230 posts
Likes: 5
Joined May 2012
Location: Michigan
     
Aug 15, 2012 21:56 |  #15

rjx wrote in post #14863445 (external link)
First, I applaud you for being cautious. IMO more photographers should be. Yes, it's fun and exciting to get new gear but I wonder how many people have actually mastered what they already have? I wonder how many people actually know the ins and outs of the gear they have before buying more gear which will shift their focus from the old to new. I think it's refreshing on this site, and other sites ALL OVER THE NET when I see someone put real thought into it.

Instead of buying more gear, you could use that money to become a stronger photographer by attending a workshop or a local photography course, or paying for content on creativelive.com, kelbytraining.com, or Lynda.com. You could get some great books, or go on a site like craftandvision.com and buy a ton of inexpensive ebooks.

You could put the gear you have to use and plan an inexpensive 2 day photo trip. A trip where the sole purpose is to photograph a location or area of interest. $200 will buy cheap round trip airfare and a cheap hotel somewhere near by.




This is the advice I needed. I thought about it and I'm putting the money toward a trip. I already booked a hotel in Chicago and I bought a round trip ticket on the "Mega Bus" for $18. I haven't been there in a few years, and the last time I went I wasn't taking pictures. Now I get to explore the city and document my experience.
It never really occurred to me to do something like this, so thanks for the suggestion!


Gripped Canon 60D 50 f/1.8---17-50 f/2.8---70-200 f/4 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,087 views & 0 likes for this thread, 26 members have posted to it.
Need VS. Want
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1081 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.