Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
Thread started 18 Aug 2012 (Saturday) 20:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Spider in My Garden

 
Dave ­ Weldon
Senior Member
Avatar
529 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 449
Joined Sep 2010
     
Aug 18, 2012 20:48 |  #1

Howdy,

Don't know what kind :(.
Didn't realized I had goofed the framing, so I'm sorry to post an image where the original didn't have all of the legs in the shot :cry:. Lots of purposeful cropping of the sides though.
Those spider legs look just like King Crab legs. Butter anyone :D.
T2i, 100L, 1/13th, ISO 100, f/11, tripod, natural morning light.

Do you think I should have up'd the ISO to 400, gone with f/16 and increased the speed to cover for slight breezes? It just doesn't look as sharp as I had hoped.

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v661/dave_weldon/Photography/Macro/SpiderMB08-18-2012.jpg

www.photoshooter.org (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mandokid1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,679 posts
Gallery: 718 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 1109
Joined Nov 2010
Location: scarborough ontario canada
     
Aug 18, 2012 21:34 |  #2

nice shot,and yes more shutter speed would of helped.


DENIS
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mandokid1/ (external link)
7-Dmk11 5-D Mark 11.5D mark 111
Canon 100 macro, Canon MPE-65, Canon 16-35,24-70,70-200,300 F4,and Sigma 150-600 dg sport

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBigDog
Goldmember
2,068 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 681
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sicklerville, NJ, USA
     
Aug 18, 2012 23:23 |  #3

yeah I would have tried around f/8 to f/5.6 and bring up the shutter speed. If there was a slight breeze, chances are the spider was moving in it, so the 1/13th most likely caught his motion thus being a little soft.

I think that's some kind of orb weaver


Christian
http://www.cegphotogra​phy.com/ (external link)
Member, Full Disc Aviation (external link)
Flickr (external link) * Facebook (external link)
Instagram (external link)Aviation Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LordV
Macro Photo-Lord of the Year 2006
Avatar
62,304 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 6879
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Worthing UK
     
Aug 19, 2012 01:42 |  #4

Lovely capture- like the light
Brian v.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/lordv/ (external link)
http://www.lordv.smugm​ug.com/ (external link)
Macro Hints and tips
Canon 600D, 40D, 5D mk2, 7D, Tamron 90mm macro, Sigma 105mm OS, Canon MPE-65,18-55 kit lens X2, canon 200mm F2.8 L, Tamron 28-70mm xrdi, Other assorted bits

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Aug 19, 2012 01:46 |  #5

That's a great shot of a really intriguing spider.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BasAndrews
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,091 posts
Gallery: 100 photos
Likes: 5700
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Bristol UK
     
Aug 19, 2012 02:28 |  #6

Great work.


Bas (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
33,007 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 47146
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Aug 19, 2012 10:19 |  #7

Lovely shot, light is good.


Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dave ­ Weldon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
529 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 449
Joined Sep 2010
     
Aug 19, 2012 11:51 as a reply to  @ Lester Wareham's post |  #8

Howdy All,

Thanks for the feedback and comments :D. (Thanks Big Dog :D: He's an Orb Weaver)

Not sure I like it more than yesterday's but here's another try from just before 8am this morning (yesterday's was 9:30am). T2i, 100L, 1/60th, f/20, ISO 400. Tweaked in Lightroom 4.1 for for exposure, sharpness, noise, etc.
Tried adding a bit of light with a remoted 580II and Rogue Flash Bender. Not sure if it helped or hindered. Looks a little "flashy". Gonna have to work on a better flash mount and modifier for macro, especially with portrait positioning.
I cropped the left side because of a horrendous background strip of white painted wood along that whole edge :mad:. The top and bottom were ony about 10% cropped.
I went with f/20 trying to get a bit of depth between his mouth parts and his back but only with so-so results. I probably traded too much by hitting the diffraction wall :(. It looks soft and the look of his fuzz doesn't appeal to my eye. Just after a got a few shots the breeze began and that pretty much ended it.

All-in-all, I think I liked yesterday's available light more.

It was interesting to see him chase down a tiny insect and then return to the exact spot so perfectly re-positioned that I didn't even have to move the framing :cool:.

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v661/dave_weldon/Photography/Macro/SpiderMB08-19-2012.jpg

www.photoshooter.org (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
P1Fanatic
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Reading,UK
     
Aug 19, 2012 12:14 as a reply to  @ Dave Weldon's post |  #9

I have never taken a proper macro shot so won't pass comment. I fancy trying my hand and like the sound of the 100L. Your shots are without an extension right?

Cheers
Simon




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dave ­ Weldon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
529 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 449
Joined Sep 2010
     
Aug 19, 2012 12:24 |  #10

P1Fanatic wrote in post #14878215 (external link)
I have never taken a proper macro shot so won't pass comment. I fancy trying my hand and like the sound of the 100L. Your shots are without an extension right?

Cheers
Simon

Howdy Simon,

Yep, no extension although I do have a set of Kenkos :D. I doubt that my talents have yet to squeeze-out the true performance of the "L" over the regular 100m Macro but I do like the stabilization when using it handheld. I also enjoy the overall feel of its mechanics and I do tend appreciate superior build quality wherever I find it.


www.photoshooter.org (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,434 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4798
Joined Dec 2008
     
Aug 19, 2012 12:31 as a reply to  @ P1Fanatic's post |  #11

Nice looking spider, Dave. Someone (I think Brian V.) did an excellent series of comparison shots a year or two ago, showing DOF vs defraction at various f-stops. Since then, I use f/11 almost exclusively for my macro shots. I'll see if I can find the thread.

edit: found it.... https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10623485&po​stcount=31 Mmmm but that doesn't show higher f's like f/22. Some more examples in this thread: https://photography-on-the.net …ghlight=defract​ion&page=2


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dave ­ Weldon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
529 posts
Gallery: 40 photos
Likes: 449
Joined Sep 2010
     
Aug 19, 2012 12:50 |  #12

LV Moose wrote in post #14878268 (external link)
Nice looking spider, Dave. Someone (I think Brian V.) did an excellent series of comparison shots a year or two ago, showing DOF vs defraction at various f-stops. Since then, I use f/11 almost exclusively for my macro shots. I'll see if I can find the thread.

edit: found it.... https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10623485&po​stcount=31 Mmmm but that doesn't show higher f's like f/22. Some more examples in this thread: https://photography-on-the.net …ghlight=defract​ion&page=2

Thanks :D!


www.photoshooter.org (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
calypsob
Goldmember
Avatar
1,179 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 91
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Lynchburg Virginia
     
Aug 19, 2012 13:32 as a reply to  @ Dave Weldon's post |  #13

If you shoot macro hand held then do not allow the shutter speed to be any slower than 1/200. Also I usually stay at f/11 or greater. You can do a 2 shot focus stack if you need to get more into focus at this magnification, just pan forwards and backwards shooting multiple shots and then stack them in photoshop later. I doenjoy the natural light in the first image of the spider, my backgrounds are usually blacked out I have not had much success with natural lighting.


Wes
-----------
flickr (external link)
Gear: Many gears Yes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,926 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Spider in My Garden
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Macro 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
921 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.