I've searched everywhere including these forums and havent seen one. Looking for the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 DG on a 20D (with lens hood if possible
)
Crashoran Goldmember 1,734 posts Joined Nov 2005 Location: Austin,Texas More info | Dec 20, 2005 21:29 | #1 I've searched everywhere including these forums and havent seen one. Looking for the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 DG on a 20D (with lens hood if possible
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 21, 2005 13:38 | #2 Anyone?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Dec 21, 2005 13:57 | #3 I might be able to oblige tonight, if you can wait. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
olz Senior Member 701 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Ã…rhus, Denmark More info | Dec 21, 2005 17:09 | #4 SIGMA 70-200mm Cheers
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GSH "wetter than an otter's pocket" 3,939 posts Likes: 16 Joined Nov 2004 Location: NE England. More info | Dec 21, 2005 17:50 | #5 A couple of my toys Geoff www.bhppix.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Dec 21, 2005 18:48 | #6 Ok now I'm confused. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trippinbillies40 Senior Member 300 posts Joined Oct 2004 Location: Cincinnati, OH More info | Mine's coming in the mail tomorrow! eos20d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wow, now this lens has become popular. I just need to sell some more stuff to get his lens. |Canon 80D|40D backup|24-105 F4/L|Sigma 70-200 F/2.8|Sigma 150-500 C|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 21, 2005 23:56 | #9 Sorry, I was talking about pictures of the actual lens and camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jman13 Cream of the Crop 5,567 posts Likes: 164 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Columbus, OH More info | Crashoran wrote: (Question also: If I attach one of the 1.4x or 2x teleconverters, does it still stay at 2.8 in the entire range?) With a 1.4x you will lose one stop, and with a 2x, you'll lose 2 stops. So, 1.4x you'll have max f/4, and with the 2x, you'll have max f/5.6. Jordan Steele - http://www.jsteelephotos.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shiatostorm Goldmember 1,073 posts Joined May 2005 Location: Bristol, UK More info | cool lens, thinking about getting one myself, but surely putting it on a tripod near a pool is asking for trouble?!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1792 guests, 133 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||