bobbyz wrote in post #14894670
Makes you wonder sometimes if real photographers test these cameras at these camera mfg companies.
When I was an operating systems computer programmer on IBM mainframes I went to a couple of meetings every year with the guys who designed and programmed the IBM operating systems. One year there were lots and lots of changes, most of them bad, to the operating system so at the meeting I asked them what happened. Well, they had gotten a lot of new guys straight out of college with their computer science degrees and fancy ideas of how things "should" work and had just started changing things willy-nilly to be the way they thought it should be. Lots of things broke but most of all nothing worked the way you expected it to! I think Canon got a bunch of new designers straight out of college whose only previous camera experience was their iPhones! I am also totally convinced that the entire delay in product delivery was the higher ups, after getting feedback on how awful their new design was from "real" photographers, were dancing around the board room wetting their panties trying to decide what to do ... I believe this is a common cultural phenomenon is that part of the world and it took them nine months to decide to release it to market. But they hadn't spent a millisecond of all that time thinking about how to correct the problem, so it'll be many months before it is addressed ... kinda like they did with the 1DMIII's that were "perfect" until every photographer in the world proved them wrong ... a problem that has never been properly fixed.
In fact, I'll bet they come out with a solution (or two) that just make things worse ... I have noticed that Canon never, ever does the straight forward obvious thing to fix a problem and most of their solutions have to be tuned and tuned and tuned. I think four firmware fixes and one (or sometimes two) hardware fix for every 1DMIII body but never really right.