I suspect it all depends upon what you started out using, which LCD readout you'll use.
My first modern Canon's were a pair of EOS-3 and an Elan 7E. Top LCD only on those film cameras. So with DSLRs I still mostly use only the top LCD to set up the camera and use the rear screen occasionally to review images and check histograms. I do use the Q screen occasionally to set things up when I'm working in really low light situations, but that's not often. I keep the rear screen dark most of the time while shooting (i.e., no auto review of images) because I find it really intrusive, sitting right below the viewfinder eyeport.
Coming from Rebel/xxxD series I can see where you would be in the habit of using the rear LCD screen, since that's what you are accustomed to (it's the only thing the series offers). Eventually you might learn to like the top screen better, but maybe not. Doesn't really matter, it's the same info either way.
But I often don't use either screen. The 60D (and earlier), 7D, 5D-series all seem easier than Rebel series to use without moving your eye away from the viewfinder. Maybe I could learn to do the same with the Rebels, if I used them more. It's a lot faster, if you can make adjustements to the basic camera settings while keeping your eye to the viewfinder.
OP, if the 60D feels better to you and the control layout seems nicer, that's probably what you should get. The only exception would be if you are short on good quality lenses, then I'd suggest buy the cheapest camera you can... or keep what you've got for now, and put money into lenses instead. Ultimately lenses will have a whole lot more to do with how your images look, than the camera used behind them.