Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 22 Aug 2012 (Wednesday) 20:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

400 won't focus with IS off - Help

 
huntersdad
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 22, 2012 20:35 |  #1

I picked up a used 400 2.8 IS off FM over the weekend and received it today. Got a chance to check it out this evening and everything seemed fine. Glass is clean, IS is working, AF is accurate, fast and smooth. However, I then turned the IS off and the lens won't even try to focus. I can hear it clicking inside, but nothing happening. This only happens WITH THE IS TURNED OFF. This is a problem as the lens will likely live on a gimbal and I need to be able to turn the IS off.

Date code on the lens is UN and I assume Canon would still service it as they just upgraded. However, not sure I want it serviced or if I want to send it back. Given what the 400s with slightly newer date codes are going for, I got what I feel like is a pretty good deal.

Anyone have this happen before? Is there something I am missing (not my first super) or is ther a legitimate problem here?


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 22, 2012 21:21 |  #2

Also noticed with the lens attached and IS on, camera body operates fine. With IS off, the top LCD starts to flicker and LV won't turn on.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mileslong24
Senior Member
508 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jun 2011
     
Aug 22, 2012 21:45 as a reply to  @ huntersdad's post |  #3

Thats odd, maybe something to do with the pins? If it were me and I just bought a lens that costs as much as that one does, I would probably send it back. Can't imagine anything on that lens is cheap to fix. Not to mention it's hard to imagine the seller didn't know the issue and thats why the price was so attractive.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScubaDude
Goldmember
Avatar
1,104 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Waveland, MS
     
Aug 23, 2012 05:07 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Have you tried the lens on a different camera body?


Canon [7D & BG-E7 grip] [T1i & BG-E5 grip] [400mm f/5.6L] [50mm f/1.8 II] [18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS]
Induro [AT313 tripod] [AM25 monopod] [GHB2 gimbal head]
My Flickr page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 23, 2012 05:52 |  #5

I do not have a second body to try the lens on, but can probably find one and do it today.

The seller and I have been in communication and he swears there were no issues when he shipped the lens out. Even said one of the sample pictures he posted with the sale was taken on a tripod with is off and AF working (picture of the moon, so I believe him).


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,262 posts
Likes: 1530
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Aug 23, 2012 06:35 |  #6

Not to mention it's hard to imagine the seller didn't know the issue and thats why the price was so attractive.

These body/lens combinations are quite complex. Just because the buyer has an issue doe not mean the seller had an issue. It is entirely possible the lens worked perfectly for the seller and differently for the buyer. We don't even know if the seller was using a 7D...

If the lens is the Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM the IS version installed in this lens is tripod-sensing so turning it off is self-defeating. The lens knows that a tripod is likely being used when vibrations go below a certain level. Canon recommends leaving the IS turned on when mounting this 400 on a tripod to take advantage of the IS mode 2, thus reducing mirror slap, shutter and tripod vibrations. There are two IS modes, mode 1 and 2, which is for panning (stabilization in vertical only). IF that is the lens you are using, some time with the manual might be worthwhile.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 23, 2012 07:21 |  #7

John from PA wrote in post #14895541 (external link)
These body/lens combinations are quite complex. Just because the buyer has an issue doe not mean the seller had an issue. It is entirely possible the lens worked perfectly for the seller and differently for the buyer. We don't even know if the seller was using a 7D...

If the lens is the Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM the IS version installed in this lens is tripod-sensing so turning it off is self-defeating. The lens knows that a tripod is likely being used when vibrations go below a certain level. Canon recommends leaving the IS turned on when mounting this 400 on a tripod to take advantage of the IS mode 2, thus reducing mirror slap, shutter and tripod vibrations. There are two IS modes, mode 1 and 2, which is for panning (stabilization in vertical only). IF that is the lens you are using, some time with the manual might be worthwhile.

Actually, his sample pics were all from the 7d. The manual, which I have read previously with my 500, specifically say on page 11 to turn the IS off when on a tripod to conserve battery power. This is what I always did with my 500 and never had any issues. While it does have the tipod sensing system, I've found that leaving it on creates more issues than it helps so I turn it off - however, I digress.

I spoke with Canon this morning who said that the cost would likely be well under $500 as it sounded like a simple short of some kind. I'm gonna test it on another body shortly and go from there.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,262 posts
Likes: 1530
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
Aug 23, 2012 08:43 |  #8

I was referring to the lens manual, which explains the differing IS modes (1 & 2) of the specific lens, Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM. If that is not the lens you are referring to then perhaps it best to turn IS off. In the lenses made by Canon in perhaps the last 5 to 8 years, the lenses themselves are designed to detect two planes of motion. If the vertical motion is extremely small and their is some horizontal motion, then an algoritm determines that the camera/lens is likely on a tripod, so it has the capability of shutting down any IS corrections applied to the vertical plane. Even in the manual Canon recommends turning IS off on a tripod, but I think most people find mode 2 to be useful.

I've attached the manual which may prove helpful.

In most of the lenses if you rotate the body to a portrait orientation this feature won't work, so IS should be turned off.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
huntersdad
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
4,870 posts
Likes: 652
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 23, 2012 08:48 |  #9

John from PA wrote in post #14895894 (external link)
I was referring to the lens manual, which explains the differing IS modes of the specific lens, Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM. If that is not the lens you are referring to then perhaps it best to turn IS off. In the lenses made by Canon in perhaps the last 5 to 8 years, the lenses themselves are designed to detect two planes of motion. If the vertical motion is extremely small and their is some horizontal motion, then an algoritm determines that the camera/lens is likely on a tripod, so it has the capability of shutting down any IS corrections applied to the vertical plane.

In most of the lenses if you rotate the body to a portrait orientation this feature won't work, so IS should be turned off.

We're on the same page - I was talking about the lens manual. Tested it on 2 other bodies this morning and talked with Canon. They are pretty sure it is an electrical issue with something having poped lose.

Now, it's up to the buyer how he wants to proceed.


Facebook (external link)

http://WWW.BLENDEDLIGH​TPHOTOGRAPHY.COM (external link)
1DxIII x 2 / 24 1.4 II / Sigma 35 1.4 / 85 1.4L / 70-200L II / 300 II / AD600Pros

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,005 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
400 won't focus with IS off - Help
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2762 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.