WOW those refurbs are at a killer price !!!!
gratchie Senior Member ![]() 957 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Los Angeles, California More info | Aug 27, 2012 15:00 | #32 Phoenixkh wrote in post #14913583 ![]() The refurbs are now back in stock And on sale. Just in case you want to upset yourself. ![]() http://shop.usa.canon.com …wAll_10051_10051_-1_22751 ![]() that's just not fair, Canon.... bought mine just about a month ago at full 1.5k price GearList || Canon 5D Mark III | 24L II | 135L | 70-300L | 24-105L | 600 EX-RT | ST-E3-RT | RX100M2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Phoenixkh a mere speck More info | Aug 27, 2012 15:14 | #33 Gratchie, Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 15:31 | #34 KarlGB77 wrote in post #14913471 ![]() The 70-300L is nice, but its not quite the IQ of the 70-200 f4 IS. http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=3&APIComp=2 ![]() I read a ton of different reviews, including Bryan's. Some reviews found the 70-300 better and some liked the 70-200 better. There's one point they all agree on, though. The 70-300 is at least as good at 70mm and much better at 300mm than the 70-200 is at 280mm with the 1.4x TC. I wanted as much reach as possible and not have to fiddle with a TC, so after much thought, I went with the 70-300. The size was also a big factor as the 70-300 fits easily in my bags mounted to the 7D. The 70-200 would not. Mark J.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KarlGB77 Senior Member 556 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: Delaware More info | Aug 27, 2012 16:50 | #35 M_Six wrote in post #14913928 ![]() I read a ton of different reviews, including Bryan's. Some reviews found the 70-300 better and some liked the 70-200 better. There's one point they all agree on, though. The 70-300 is at least as good at 70mm and much better at 300mm than the 70-200 is at 280mm with the 1.4x TC. I wanted as much reach as possible and not have to fiddle with a TC, so after much thought, I went with the 70-300. The size was also a big factor as the 70-300 fits easily in my bags mounted to the 7D. The 70-200 would not. I agree with you. Canon 5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, T2i (2), 24-105 f4LIS, 17-40 f4L, 70-200f4L IS, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 100 2.8, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 50 1.8, 15-85 f4-5.6 IS, 60 2.8, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS, 430 EX II, 580 EX II, Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod w/ 498RC2, Calumet 8121 Tripod, Manfrotto 679B Monopod w/ 234 RC2 head
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bearmann Goldmember ![]() 1,228 posts Likes: 57 Joined Feb 2008 Location: I live behind Graceland in a tool shed. I often meet the man early in the morning at Krispy Kreme. More info | Aug 27, 2012 17:20 | #36 Wow, now it back at the Canon refurb store, after mine shipped out today. The refurb would have saved me about $70. Not that much difference, though. Oh, but half of the $70 I'll get back from Mr Rebates. So now the difference is only about $35 for new versus refurb. I can live with that Barry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zhengf2 Senior Member 285 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2010 Location: San Francisco More info | Aug 27, 2012 19:24 | #37 I'm half wishing I hadn't found this thread...in any case, just purchased my first L lens!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KarlGB77 Senior Member 556 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: Delaware More info | Aug 27, 2012 19:51 | #38 zhengf2 wrote in post #14914946 ![]() I'm half wishing I hadn't found this thread...in any case, just purchased my first L lens! Why do you say that? Canon 5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, T2i (2), 24-105 f4LIS, 17-40 f4L, 70-200f4L IS, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 100 2.8, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 50 1.8, 15-85 f4-5.6 IS, 60 2.8, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS, 430 EX II, 580 EX II, Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod w/ 498RC2, Calumet 8121 Tripod, Manfrotto 679B Monopod w/ 234 RC2 head
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KarlGB77 Senior Member 556 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: Delaware More info | Wow Canon 5D Mark III, 5D Mark II, T2i (2), 24-105 f4LIS, 17-40 f4L, 70-200f4L IS, 70-200 2.8L IS II, 100 2.8, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 50 1.8, 15-85 f4-5.6 IS, 60 2.8, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS, 430 EX II, 580 EX II, Manfrotto 055XPROB Tripod w/ 498RC2, Calumet 8121 Tripod, Manfrotto 679B Monopod w/ 234 RC2 head
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zhengf2 Senior Member 285 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2010 Location: San Francisco More info | Aug 27, 2012 20:48 | #40 Just that it's a big dent in the pocket haha, other than that I'm pretty happy with the deal!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 21:51 | #41 zhengf2 wrote in post #14915301 ![]() Just that it's a big dent in the pocket haha, other than that I'm pretty happy with the deal! Rounds up to be about 1180 after sales tax (CA) You'll be even happier once you start using the lens. It's a great piece of glass. Mark J.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pdrober2 Goldmember ![]() 2,318 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Durham, NC More info | Aug 31, 2012 10:16 | #42 Finally got to try my new 70-300 last night. Thus far I am very impressed. Sharp wide open, good reach and definitely worth $1259!! Fujifilm X-T1 | 23 | 27 | 56 | 90 | 55-200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zhengf2 Senior Member 285 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2010 Location: San Francisco More info | Aug 31, 2012 12:27 | #43 still waiting here...i think it's going to arrive at san francisco today, then sit in fedex for processing...and arrive next tuesday because of the long weekend
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sonofjesse Senior Member ![]() 692 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 More info | Aug 31, 2012 12:55 | #44 |
![]() | x 1600 |
y 1600 |
Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
Latest registered member is Buld1981 957 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 |