Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 25 Aug 2012 (Saturday) 08:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

So... Is this covered by your photog insurance?

 
HarrisonClicks
Goldmember
Avatar
1,113 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Mid-Atlantic USA
     
Aug 25, 2012 08:41 |  #1

This is a horrible story. But you know what lawsuit is coming next.

Edit: It's never a bad idea to make sure you have a 10 minute discussion with your insurance agent regarding what is and what is not covered - both as to your gear and general liability. I have no idea what happened here in this horrible story. But if these pictures were the photog's idea, trouble is brewing. Suppose you direct a subject to stand somewhere and they trip and break an ankle? Covered? Personally, I do not do event / wedding photography. But if I did, I would immediately be contacting my agent if I would be covered for something like this. I am a big fan of insurance for the "what if's".

http://worldnews.nbcne​ws.com …ada?chromedomai​n=testblog (external link)


Adam
Gear List Temporarily Removed

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 532
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Aug 25, 2012 08:48 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

Wow....I mean, stuff like these you would only read about in novels...... The tragic fate and the irony of it all. Yeah, just makes sure you have a disclaimer in your contract and I think you should be all set....:p


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,497 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4585
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Aug 26, 2012 00:53 |  #3

Most camera insurance covers the personal property. If you, as photographer, tell someone to do something which ultimately causes them harm, that falls under 'Liability', not 'property'.

So do you have Liability coverage, as either a homeowner policy, or as a business policy?


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pmack
Member
Avatar
113 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2011
     
Aug 26, 2012 09:27 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #4

That's got the be the most distressing thing to witness... poor family/friends.
Little hard to even imagine how it happened, it sounds like the dress was huge!


Captured Abroad - Travel Photography Blog - Images from an overland journey (external link)
Captured Abroad - Facebook page - "like" for highlights from my blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
Aug 26, 2012 10:29 |  #5

pmack wrote in post #14908232 (external link)
That's got the be the most distressing thing to witness... poor family/friends.
Little hard to even imagine how it happened, it sounds like the dress was huge!

Several of my aunts make wedding dresses on the side, and I've been shocked at seeing how much fabric can go into even a fairly small looking full length gown. Get a good layered skirt to it, then soak that in water? Easily 100+lbs. Add in a current pulling on that large parachute of a wedding dress? That's a lot of force involved. Factor in how laughably ineffective kicking with your legs wrapped in a heavy dress would be, and it is easy to see how someone wearing such a thing could get pulled down if they slipped in deeper than expected.


I've known a few people to have drowned in a river while hiking because they decided to cross the narrow part of the river that was only around 4-6 inches deep, rather than wade across the wider deeper areas above or below where it would have been far safer. Why are those deep wide areas safer? Because the water is moving at a fraction of the speed, and you can stand comfortably (besides the cold water hitting your armpits) without the water pushing on you. In the narrows the water hits your feet like a sledge hammer, eventually you lose your footing and slip, now you're down, likely on your face, and being washed out toward the bay. If the person didn't free themselves of their pack (because they often don't think to undo their hip belts before crossing) by the time they reach the calm stretch just before the tidal area, then they won't make it back to shore before the waves start dragging them out into the bay.


Water is dangerous. It is heavy, and can carry a massive amount of energy behind it. We need it to live, but it can easily kill us if we do something stupid around it.

It probably seemed like a good idea at the time, but I don't think most people who die in accidents generally walk into them with the mindset that they're doing something dangerous in the first place. That's how the accident happens.


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
friz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,595 posts
Joined Oct 2008
     
Aug 26, 2012 10:37 |  #6

Reminds me of the photographer in my area that was using a "live" tiger in his senior pictures. Much to everyones surprise, the tiger got tired of this and mauled a student to death. I figure these would be the same sort of people that would drop their kid's off at Michael Jacksons house for a sleep over.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Aug 27, 2012 12:34 |  #7

friz wrote in post #14908467 (external link)
Reminds me of the photographer in my area that was using a "live" tiger in his senior pictures. Much to everyones surprise, the tiger got tired of this and mauled a student to death.

seems like I'm hearing more and more of the "Fatal Fotog" stories
Hope it doesn't happen to me




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gomar
Senior Member
549 posts
Likes: 32
Joined Sep 2010
Location: NYC
     
Aug 27, 2012 19:51 |  #8

This is discussed in the Weddings section.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,731 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
So... Is this covered by your photog insurance?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1678 guests, 98 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.