Lol says some without a wide angle
Sep 06, 2012 10:21 | #16 |
modchild Goldmember  1,469 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Lincoln, Uk More info | Sep 06, 2012 10:26 | #17 It would all depend on what I was shooting as to what lens I would get next if I had yours. Personally I'd get a Canon 100 f2.8 L macro as it's great for portraits as well as macro. But if you're not interested in shooting macro then maybe a 400 f2.8 IS L for longer reach. EOS 5D MkIII, EOS 70D, EOS 650D, EOS M, Canon 24-70 f2.8L MkII, Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII, Canon 100 f2.8L Macro, Canon 17-40 f4L IS, Canon 24-105 f4L IS, Canon 300 f4L IS, Canon 85 f1.8, Canon 50 f1.4, Canon 40 f2.8 STM, Canon 35 f2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Tamron 18-270 PZD, Tamron 28-300 VC, 580EX II Flash, Nissin Di866 MkII Flash, Sigma EM 140 Macro Flash and other bits.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 06, 2012 10:53 | #18 Is the 100 f/2.8L IS macro any better than the 70-200 f/2.8L IS II for Portraits? Bodies - Canon EOS 5DIII | EOS 6D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
modchild Goldmember 1,469 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Lincoln, Uk More info | Sep 06, 2012 11:54 | #19 DamianOz wrote in post #14955264  Is the 100 f/2.8L IS macro any better than the 70-200 f/2.8L IS II for Portraits? I would say there's not a great deal of difference between the two TBH. I haven't done much portrait stuff with the 70-200 yet but what I have done looks very similar. Obviously the macro comes into its own as you get closer specially under the 70-200 MFD but the 70-200 just keeps on surprising me with just how good it is every time I use it. EOS 5D MkIII, EOS 70D, EOS 650D, EOS M, Canon 24-70 f2.8L MkII, Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII, Canon 100 f2.8L Macro, Canon 17-40 f4L IS, Canon 24-105 f4L IS, Canon 300 f4L IS, Canon 85 f1.8, Canon 50 f1.4, Canon 40 f2.8 STM, Canon 35 f2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Tamron 18-270 PZD, Tamron 28-300 VC, 580EX II Flash, Nissin Di866 MkII Flash, Sigma EM 140 Macro Flash and other bits.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jerbear00 Goldmember 1,113 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Southern California More info | Sep 06, 2012 11:59 | #20 Depends on your style... For me you have great glass! but no fast regular prime. You need a 50L or 35L depending on what you like to shoot. 5d3 & Lens CoLLector
LOG IN TO REPLY |
robd54 Member 107 posts Joined Jan 2010 More info | Sep 06, 2012 12:42 | #21 +1 for UWA, I just got the 17-40 for my 5dIII, mostly due to being half the price of the 16-35 and for the price, I love it. Focuses fast enough and IQ is really good. With the ISO capabilities of the body, I'm happy with F4. If anything, I'll add a fast prime in that range as sometimes indoors even 2.8 is low. I'd recommend 17-40! Canon 5D Mark III, Canon SL1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1474 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
