I have photo's on my computer that are just taking up way to much space and want to delete them off. I was thinking about getting a drobo. How would you do this?
Tc202 Goldmember More info | Aug 27, 2012 12:45 | #1 I have photo's on my computer that are just taking up way to much space and want to delete them off. I was thinking about getting a drobo. How would you do this? Thomas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 12:54 | #2 I went with a Synology NAS. Same general idea but WAY faster than the Drobo I used a couple of years ago and it can be accessed from any computer on the network.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 13:11 | #3 will it work with mac? Thomas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 13:20 | #4 Tc202 wrote in post #14913354 will it work with mac? Yep. Its actually a small server running Linux. You connect it to the network and manage it through a web browser. Share some folders and you're on your way. I got the 5 bay model. I recommend getting at least 2 bays so you can mirror the drives for redundancy. You can add or upgrade drives to expand its capacity at any time without having to offload/reload data from the NAS. One drive can fail and your data will still be accessible.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 14:28 | #5 Thanks, I will compare this with drobo g technology. Thomas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Aug 27, 2012 15:03 | #6 If you go with a NAS you'll want gigabit networking and a good faster router. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 17:14 | #7 tim wrote in post #14913810 A better solution is generally to put another hard drive inside your computer, if it can take it. It costs around $150 and takes ten minutes, plus quite a few hours to format it. That gives no redundancy and migrating to a new drive is a chore, especially as the drives get bigger and bigger.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 17:29 | #8 I think I am going to go for the drobo s. Thanks for your help Thomas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Aug 27, 2012 17:49 | #9 mike_d wrote in post #14914398 That gives no redundancy and migrating to a new drive is a chore, especially as the drives get bigger and bigger. Of course it gives no redundancy, data inside the computer shouldn't be replicated. Drive failures are rare, and RAID is to increase uptime, not act as a backup. RAID is not a backup. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 18:16 | #10 tim wrote in post #14914564 Of course it gives no redundancy, data inside the computer shouldn't be replicated. Drive failures are rare, and RAID is to increase uptime, not act as a backup. RAID is not a backup. Given the choice between tolerating a drive failure or not, I'll take the fault-tolerance RAID offers. Drives DO fail, and almost always at an extremely inconvenient time. Of course I still do backups. RAID5 or better also gives better performance than a single drive can offer. Single drive performance absolutely collapses under multi-tasking.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Aug 27, 2012 18:48 | #11 Sure, RAID is better than no raid, but it's not a backup. If performance is a big issue just replace it with an SSD. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 18:56 | #12 tim wrote in post #14914808 Sure, RAID is better than no raid, but it's not a backup. If performance is a big issue just replace it with an SSD. I never said it was a replacement for a backup. Its redundant storage. The failure of 1 or 2 drives can be tolerated without downtime depending on the RAID level.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 19:05 | #13 Sorry for my lack of knowlege on this subject, but would it be bad to back my photos on a drobo? I was looking at the Drobo s and drobo 5d, which one would you choose and which drives would you buy to put in it? Thanks Thomas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2012 20:03 | #14 Tc202 wrote in post #14914872 Sorry for my lack of knowlege on this subject, but would it be bad to back my photos on a drobo? I was looking at the Drobo s and drobo 5d, which one would you choose and which drives would you buy to put in it? Thanks For just backing up data, I wouldn't bother with the expense of a Drobo. But if you're planning on moving your data off your computer as your first post stated, then a Drobo or NAS is a good place to put it since they can tolerate one drive failure without losing any data.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks, this will also be for storing. Thomas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1489 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||