Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 27 Aug 2012 (Monday) 12:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Storage

 
Tc202
Goldmember
Avatar
1,979 posts
Gallery: 436 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 5424
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Cody, WY
     
Aug 27, 2012 12:45 |  #1

I have photo's on my computer that are just taking up way to much space and want to delete them off. I was thinking about getting a drobo. How would you do this?


Thomas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 27, 2012 12:54 |  #2

I went with a Synology NAS. Same general idea but WAY faster than the Drobo I used a couple of years ago and it can be accessed from any computer on the network.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tc202
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,979 posts
Gallery: 436 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 5424
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Cody, WY
     
Aug 27, 2012 13:11 |  #3

will it work with mac?


Thomas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 27, 2012 13:20 |  #4

Tc202 wrote in post #14913354 (external link)
will it work with mac?

Yep. Its actually a small server running Linux. You connect it to the network and manage it through a web browser. Share some folders and you're on your way. I got the 5 bay model. I recommend getting at least 2 bays so you can mirror the drives for redundancy. You can add or upgrade drives to expand its capacity at any time without having to offload/reload data from the NAS. One drive can fail and your data will still be accessible.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tc202
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,979 posts
Gallery: 436 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 5424
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Cody, WY
     
Aug 27, 2012 14:28 |  #5

Thanks, I will compare this with drobo g technology.


Thomas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Aug 27, 2012 15:03 |  #6

If you go with a NAS you'll want gigabit networking and a good faster router.

A better solution is generally to put another hard drive inside your computer, if it can take it. It costs around $150 and takes ten minutes, plus quite a few hours to format it.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 27, 2012 17:14 |  #7

tim wrote in post #14913810 (external link)
A better solution is generally to put another hard drive inside your computer, if it can take it. It costs around $150 and takes ten minutes, plus quite a few hours to format it.

That gives no redundancy and migrating to a new drive is a chore, especially as the drives get bigger and bigger.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tc202
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,979 posts
Gallery: 436 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 5424
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Cody, WY
     
Aug 27, 2012 17:29 |  #8

I think I am going to go for the drobo s. Thanks for your help


Thomas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Aug 27, 2012 17:49 |  #9

mike_d wrote in post #14914398 (external link)
That gives no redundancy and migrating to a new drive is a chore, especially as the drives get bigger and bigger.

Of course it gives no redundancy, data inside the computer shouldn't be replicated. Drive failures are rare, and RAID is to increase uptime, not act as a backup. RAID is not a backup.

Offsite backups are essential, but that's not what this thread is about.

There are plenty of options other than Drobo, many of them better. There's another thread with a similar topic at the moment where something else was recommended, I think it's this one. It's worth reading. Drobo have great marketing, better than their technology from what I've read.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 27, 2012 18:16 |  #10

tim wrote in post #14914564 (external link)
Of course it gives no redundancy, data inside the computer shouldn't be replicated. Drive failures are rare, and RAID is to increase uptime, not act as a backup. RAID is not a backup.

Given the choice between tolerating a drive failure or not, I'll take the fault-tolerance RAID offers. Drives DO fail, and almost always at an extremely inconvenient time. Of course I still do backups. RAID5 or better also gives better performance than a single drive can offer. Single drive performance absolutely collapses under multi-tasking.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Aug 27, 2012 18:48 |  #11

Sure, RAID is better than no raid, but it's not a backup. If performance is a big issue just replace it with an SSD.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 27, 2012 18:56 |  #12

tim wrote in post #14914808 (external link)
Sure, RAID is better than no raid, but it's not a backup. If performance is a big issue just replace it with an SSD.

I never said it was a replacement for a backup. Its redundant storage. The failure of 1 or 2 drives can be tolerated without downtime depending on the RAID level.

SSDs are horribly expensive for storing large amounts of data and you still have failure issues, just like with a hard drive. Plus, they're small so you'd either have to spread the data out and manage what's on what drive, or RAID them into a single volume.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tc202
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,979 posts
Gallery: 436 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 5424
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Cody, WY
     
Aug 27, 2012 19:05 |  #13

Sorry for my lack of knowlege on this subject, but would it be bad to back my photos on a drobo? I was looking at the Drobo s and drobo 5d, which one would you choose and which drives would you buy to put in it? Thanks


Thomas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 27, 2012 20:03 |  #14

Tc202 wrote in post #14914872 (external link)
Sorry for my lack of knowlege on this subject, but would it be bad to back my photos on a drobo? I was looking at the Drobo s and drobo 5d, which one would you choose and which drives would you buy to put in it? Thanks

For just backing up data, I wouldn't bother with the expense of a Drobo. But if you're planning on moving your data off your computer as your first post stated, then a Drobo or NAS is a good place to put it since they can tolerate one drive failure without losing any data.

Of course, you'll want to make at least one independent backup of whatever storage solution you choose. RAID arrays can fail due to hardware or software errors. Power surges can kill your NAS/Drobo. Or you could simply accidentally delete something important. I backup my NAS to a USB3.0 hard drive and to Crashplan.

I'm not familiar with Drobo's newer units. I worked with one of their 4 bay models from about 2 years ago and even connected over Firewire 800, performance was sadly lacking in my opinion and didn't live up to the claims on their web site. Western Digital has a new line of NAS-optimized Red drives you might consider for populating whatever you get.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tc202
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,979 posts
Gallery: 436 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 5424
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Cody, WY
     
Aug 27, 2012 20:49 as a reply to  @ mike_d's post |  #15

Thanks, this will also be for storing.


Thomas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,031 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Storage
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1489 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.