Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 22 Dec 2005 (Thursday) 02:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Blurred pics...

 
august23
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
Avatar
3,126 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
     
Dec 22, 2005 02:41 |  #1

Hey guys, I'm a total newb at post-processing and editing, so I really need your help. I have over 700 pictures that I took over 10 days in italy with alot of my friends and it was awesome. unfortunately, at least 50 of them came out blurry. Is there any way to get a sharpened pic? I tried sharpening it in irfanview but it looks rediculously bad. I was curious if you guys knew how to get the detail back, it it's possible. Thanks.

sincerely,
a newb:oops:



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 22, 2005 03:37 |  #2

It's very difficult to do anything about photos that are blurry. In photoshop try the unsharp mask at 500%, 2, and 2, that sometimes helps.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vjack
Goldmember
Avatar
1,602 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Mississippi, USA
     
Dec 22, 2005 07:50 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #3

Post a couple so we can see how bad the blur is. Post processing can do wonders but has its limits.



Canon 20D
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6
L IS
Canon Speedlite 430EX
Manfrotto 3021BPRO; Kirk BH-1 ballhead
Canon Pixma 4200
< see my gallery (external link) >

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
august23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
Avatar
3,126 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
     
Dec 22, 2005 11:15 as a reply to  @ vjack's post |  #4

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


my friends at the colliseum at night. really wish this one would have come out sharper but i guess i cant expect much without a tripod.:cry:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


the sacred way, looked beautiful at night...of course it came out blurry.:evil:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


st peters church in vatican square. the light looked amazing coming through those enormous windows....buuuuuut BLURRY.:(

if theres anything i can do or you know you can do please...let me know. i treasure these pictures as it was one of the best times of my life..just wish i could enjoy them a little less blurry. :rolleyes:

thanks for all your help!:D


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Dec 22, 2005 11:54 |  #5

They'll look best printed at 4X6", after sharpening, too.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vjack
Goldmember
Avatar
1,602 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Mississippi, USA
     
Dec 22, 2005 13:34 as a reply to  @ PhotosGuy's post |  #6

Some shadow adjustment might bring out some detail in the first two. I agree that they'll look better at 4X6 after some sharpening. It looks like the shutter speed was probably too slow, so improvements are likely to be incremental.



Canon 20D
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Sigma 18-125mm f/3.5-5.6 DC
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6
L IS
Canon Speedlite 430EX
Manfrotto 3021BPRO; Kirk BH-1 ballhead
Canon Pixma 4200
< see my gallery (external link) >

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Dec 22, 2005 15:41 |  #7

This will have nothing to do with repairs, but for future reference, you may want to know what I'm reading from the clues that I see in the pictures.

In #3, there is no camera info (EXIF). What I see in the picture is that throughout that picture there are two images and they are out of register by the same amount all over. So, it looks like a strong flash was used coupled with a slow shutter speed, thus creating two separate images that appear as if they were taken a small fraction of a second apart. That same appearance "could" have been caused by simple movement of the camera in the middle of a long exposure.

In pictures #1 and #2, there is little mystery about what happened because the shutter speeds were 1/8 sec and 1 sec, respectively. It is virtually impossible to avoid camera movement with such slow shutter speeds. On each of those two pictures the nature of the blur looks to be due to camera movement, but it is not certain, since I cannot see any actual streaking that would indicate a direction of movement. So, it could have been just totally out of focus in both cases. If I had to guess, I would bet on movement, because even with all the focus problems one has in low light level protograhpy, it would be difficult to be that far off in focus.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,455 posts
Likes: 38
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Dec 22, 2005 21:23 as a reply to  @ Robert_Lay's post |  #8

OK, these may not be PERFECT - the best way to get sharp shots is to take sharp shots to begin with. BUT, I have long recommended FOCUS MAGIC (external link) as the best sharpening tool, especially for recovery of botched shots.

Let me know what you think.

Rad

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SSquared2000
Member
245 posts
Joined Oct 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
Dec 22, 2005 21:35 |  #9

Wow! That's a rather impressive program. I'll definitely be keeping my eye on it. Thanks for mentioning it.


Equipment: Canon Rebel XT, Tamron 28-75 2.8, 18-55 Kit Lens, 50mm 1.8, Sigma 18-200 OS
Post Processing: Lightroom 2, TheGimp, IrfanView
Interests: Enjoy photographing Landscape, B&W, Portrait...and of course my family

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
august23
THREAD ­ STARTER
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
Avatar
3,126 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
     
Dec 22, 2005 23:17 |  #10

woooow. thank you SO much. i will definately try that program out. and if u dont mind..im keeping these sharpened ones!



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,223 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Blurred pics...
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2306 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.