Anybody own both ?? How is the picture quality ??
Both weather seal ?? Which is better to get for the sharpness n contrast picture??
LeaderXXX Member 64 posts Joined Aug 2005 More info | Dec 22, 2005 22:10 | #1 Anybody own both ?? How is the picture quality ??
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | Dec 22, 2005 22:47 | #2 Both are weather sealed and picture quality is at pro standard levels. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TomW Canon Fanosapien 12,749 posts Likes: 30 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Chattanooga, Tennessee More info | Dec 22, 2005 23:16 | #3 The extra stop is about the only difference. On full-frame, corner performance of the 16-35 is better - sharper in the corners, and less light falloff. But that is not an issue on the 350D since you don't go out to that part of the lens. Both have very good contrast and color. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 23, 2005 03:20 | #4 I had the 17-40 and its a nice Lens, but my brothers 16-35 is a superior lens - the extra stop makes a world of difference for trying to get indoor shots 5D3 - 1 Dmk2N - 40D - 24-70 F2.8 - 85mm 1.8 - 70-200mm F2.8IS - - 200mm F1.8 - Canon 400mm F5.6 - Canon 430ex111 - Yongnuo 6ooexRT - Nissin 866 - PW Flex/Mini - New Purchases pending
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1792 guests, 133 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||