I tend to keep my 85 1.8 & 135 f2L on top on my 70-200 2.8L II when I want to stay compact.
I bought both for modelling/portraits.
But IQ wise (fastness/bokeh), 70-200 2.8LII beats both I guess or is the same if you don't need the faster stops?
I know f1.8 and f2 have smoother bokeh, but normally I should be able to get this through the zoomfactor of the 70-200 also, between 135-200mm right?
I'm doubting to change my setup to : 16-35 2.8L II, 24-70 2.8L, 35L, 70-200 2.8L II so with only 1 fast 1.4L lens.
The only thing I doubt is if I would sell my Canon 15 2.8 Fisheye if I would get the 16-35 2.8L II as it's only 1mm difference,
and the barel distortion of the fisheye isn't so exagerated, it's no real heavy fisheye effect.


