I love my 60D. It is by far and away the best camera I have ever owned. I'm not in class with you guys. I'm just a rank amatuer who loves photography as a hobby and I have several hobbies.
I do long for a great low-light camera. I love taking pictures on dark rides at places like WDW and I am also an amatuer astronomer and use my 60D on my LX200.
I have accumulated a fairly nice and diverse collection of EF-S lenses that would be "L-Type" if they were FF lenses. I still long for the 70-200 f4 or f2.8 and will have one one day soon, I hope. Other than that, I have about everything covered for what I use my camera for.
What I'm wondering is this. Is it time to throw out the baby with the bathwater and suck it up and sell everything to the sacrifice of going FF? With the D600 imminent and the 6D on the apparent horizon, is it finally time to sell out and go FF? I also have a T2i that I can sell too. I can probably come up with enough $$ to buy the 6D or the D600 by pitching in a few pennies (LOL, yea, I'm justifying!). I can also probably get most of my money out of my collection of lenses and replace most of them with FF lenses.
I just want to know if my thought process is pure or is it flawed somehow. I have dreamed about a FF that I could afford since I surrendered my AE-1 years ago in favor of the new Rebel digital. I miss not having that "light bucket" I use to have (There's the astronomer coming out in me!) and the DOF that a FF 35mm offers. Is it worth the sacrifice and the PITA and the $$$ it's gonna be to go FF or am I letting the hype get the best of me?
I can't be the only one here in this situation. I'm sure others of you at my level are asking yourselves the same questions. I'd love to know what the pros think.
Thank you!



