I am interested in user feedback about the Canon PIXMA Pro9500 Mark II printer which currently has a $300 rebate offer going in combination with a sale price which results in an after-rebate price in the vicinity of $300. This has led me to consider it as a replacement for my trustworthy Canon i9900 as my primary photo printer. I am very satisfied with my i9900 and would keep it as an all-purpose printer for use with use with our other computer (the old printer on that computer is dying an agonizingly slow death). I was all enthused about getting the 9500 II until I read a few reviews and owner comments and saw some frequently mentioned things such as:
- It uses lots of ink compared to other printers.
- It wastes a lot of ink with its self-cleaning cycle.
- It takes a very long time for the printer to get ready to print.
- It takes forever to print a 13 X 19 print
- The driver imposes some significant restrictions on print size if using fine art papers ... basically creating huge margins. I primarily do large prints.
- Apparently bronzing is a problem with some types of matte paper.
- Lucia pigment ink has a very limited shelf life (I have no problems with even three year old BCI-6 dye ink for the i9900).
- The paper options are somewhat limited. I use mostly non-Canon paper -- Ilford, Red River, and Inkpress.
- If not printing frequently, the nozzles can clog necessitating lots of wasted ink going through cleaning cycles.
All of this has left me on the horns of a dilemma. I don't need to get another printer if its capability is only marginally better than my i9900, especially if it has software imposed print size limitations based on the media type. My dumb old i9900 doesn't have such restrictions although it really does not handle textured fine art papers very well. B/W printing is not something that I do often. I also am not sure if it is designed to also print non-photo stuff without using huge amounts of ink -- about half of my printing is non-photo.

