Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 10 Sep 2012 (Monday) 04:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Zion - dark prints

 
Oeijur
Member
85 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2012
     
Sep 10, 2012 04:10 |  #1

I've been having trouble getting my pictures to "pop" when printed. I've printed using AspenCreekPhoto on Fuji Pearlescent in the past and the prints came out much darker than expected (used no color correction). I decided to "test" print at local costco before sending another batch of photos away, and pictures came out flat and dark again.

My monitor is not calibrated, please C&C these photos. They look good on my monitor, but as above always look dark printed.

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8435/7969549780_36be854660_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/24344071@N00/7​969549780/  (external link)
IMG_0010_2 (external link) by Mr. V5 (external link), on Flickrhttp://www.flickr.com …969539282/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)
Taken with Canon 40D 10-22mm EF-S, ISO 100, Shutter: 1/5s, F18

IMAGE: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8301/7969539282_d9f2cbb8a5_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/24344071@N00/7​969539282/  (external link)
Angel's landing view (external link) by Mr. V5 (external link), on Flickrhttp://www.flickr.com …969549780/in/ph​otostream/ (external link)
ISO 100, Shutter 1/5s, F22

Any suggestions would be welcome.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JimMcrae
Senior Member
Avatar
938 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Edinburgh
     
Sep 10, 2012 04:25 |  #2

Can't see the photos mate.


60d, 400d, 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6, 24-105mm f/4, 50mm f/1.4, 580ex II, 2 X 430ex II, Bowens 500, cs5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
Goldmember
3,984 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Dec 2010
     
Sep 10, 2012 05:21 |  #3

I'd say that #1 is a little dark. #2 looks good to me. I have the same problem when I print, so I usually make a curves layer called PrintBright on every image just before printing on my Epson printer. If you check the histogram it will give you a good idea whether you need to boost brightness.


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 467
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Sep 10, 2012 06:33 as a reply to  @ Qbx's post |  #4

Were these jpeg images out of the camera?

My monitor is not calibrated,

That being the case...how do you know what they're supposed to look like? ;)


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,134 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Sep 10, 2012 07:10 |  #5

Not unusual at all. Have you calibrated you monitor to your printer, or visa-versa? Until you do that, there will always be a mismatch. If you end up printing at a commercial place you should down load their printer profiles. Even Costco provides these for each of their locations. It will end up saving you tons of time and money trying to print shots like this.

Awesome location BTW. Haven't been there in ages and need to get back.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carlh
Senior Member
571 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Telford, Shropshire
     
Sep 10, 2012 07:47 |  #6

agree with QBX on number#1, bit dark and #2 looks a little oversaturated to me.

Stunning locale.



www.cdhpix.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,434 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4798
Joined Dec 2008
     
Sep 10, 2012 08:03 as a reply to  @ carlh's post |  #7

If you don't want to calibrate your monitor, change it's settings to match your prints, and save them as a certain profile that you can switch to when you're processing your shots. I have a feeling your monitor is set too bright.


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
Goldmember
3,984 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Dec 2010
     
Sep 10, 2012 09:11 |  #8

LV Moose wrote in post #14971077 (external link)
If you don't want to calibrate your monitor, change it's settings to match your prints, and save them as a certain profile that you can switch to when your processing your shots. I have a feeling your monitor is set too bright.

Sounds like good advice; but I tried that and my monitor was just too dark for comfort; so I just adjusted my brain to see over-bright images on the monitor (after the Print-Bright curves layer). Then after printing I hide the layer.


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gen2roller
Senior Member
380 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Sep 10, 2012 10:38 |  #9

the second one has way too much saturation


7D Gripped | 5D MKII Gripped |Canon 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200L f/2.8 IS II | 16-35L f/2.8 II | Opteka 6.5mm Fisheye | Cybersyncs and Vivitars
Brian Sorg
www.facebook.com/bsorg​photo (external link)
www.bsorgphoto.bigcart​el.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Sep 10, 2012 11:21 |  #10

carlh wrote in post #14971034 (external link)
agree with QBX on number#1, bit dark and #2 looks a little oversaturated to me.

Stunning locale.

Agree .


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Sep 10, 2012 12:05 as a reply to  @ Flo's post |  #11

Really, if you want to get to where what you see on your monitor is accurate, you have to calibrate the monitor.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Oeijur
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
85 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Aug 2012
     
Sep 10, 2012 21:22 |  #12

Does calibration help with brightness levels also? I thought it was mainly to get the correct color hues.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Sep 11, 2012 10:40 as a reply to  @ Oeijur's post |  #13

It depends on the calibration package you buy. Good ones will include gamma adjustment. I'm not sure if luminance is part of it but that's something you would adjust properly before you begin the calibration process. There are some targets you can use to get that right and then calibrate from there. Your environment is important as well. Here are some tools for you. http://www.normankoren​.com/makingfineprints1​A.html (external link)

There is a LOT of reading here but it is worth understanding if you want things to look in print as they do on your screen.
Also, keep in mind that cheaper printers do a horrible job of color accuracy. I prefer sending to a lab like MPix Pro. Wherever you send them, if you work with a calibrated monitor and you get things just the way you want them, make sure the lab knows NOT to color-correct your images. Otherwise all that work will be for nothing.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,749 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 206
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Sep 12, 2012 00:26 |  #14

Oeijur wrote in post #14974509 (external link)
Does calibration help with brightness levels also? I thought it was mainly to get the correct color hues.

The better calibration systems/monitors will let you set a luminance value. There is no singe correct value as the luminance you pick depends on what you want to view. Since I don't like constantly changing luminance mine is set to 110 cd/m^2 and my room light when editing is 20-30 Lux. No doubt that 110 takes a bit of time to get used to since it's pretty dim, but I'm pretty comfortable with it now.

Another important area to consider is contrast ratio. I print mainly on lustre paper, so I try to calibrate to a contrast ratio of 250:1 (currently I'm at 241). The contrast ratios I target are:

Glossy - 325:1
Lustre - 250:1
Matte - 175:1


Prior to using my latest monitor and calibrating with NEC's SpectraViewII I used a Spyder3Pro with a Dell 2209WA. The Spyder didn't let me enter a luminance value like I do with my NEC PA monitor, but instead in order to match prints my Dell 2209WA monitor's brightness had to be turned down to 10-15%.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,437 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Zion - dark prints
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1505 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.