either have your camera sharpen them or do it in post but all digital images need to sharpened
stanclark Goldmember 1,143 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2012 Location: Windsor,California More info | Sep 10, 2012 23:46 | #16 either have your camera sharpen them or do it in post but all digital images need to sharpened So if God made Man & Woman....whats his excuse for Nikon...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 10, 2012 23:50 | #17 stanclark wrote in post #14975088 either have your camera sharpen them or do it in post but all digital images need to sharpened Yea, I do understand that a lot of professional looking pictures have some PP and are sharpened, but I've seen SOOC pictures that have looked quite a bit sharper than my pics, so whatever I can do to improve my technique can only then help the PP result as well imo.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 10, 2012 23:51 | #18 mannetti21 wrote in post #14975080 I table or counter-top will work just fine for that simple test. You just need to take the possibility of hand shake or body sway out of the equation. Also a good idea to set the camera to the 2 or 10sec delay timer so you don't accidentally move the camera when you're pressing the shutter. Great, I'll definitely try this out. Thanks!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stanclark Goldmember 1,143 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2012 Location: Windsor,California More info | Sep 11, 2012 00:23 | #19 use the picture styles in the camera just change the settings, you can sharpen,adjust contrast, saturation.... will save editing time if you set it right So if God made Man & Woman....whats his excuse for Nikon...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 11, 2012 07:02 | #20 Depends on how you are resizing for web display. There is some sharpening that you can apply in camera but your software is more important for how it will appear on a computer screen. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KirkS518 Goldmember 3,983 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2012 Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh More info | Sep 11, 2012 08:01 | #21 stanclark wrote in post #14975200 use the picture styles in the camera just change the settings, you can sharpen,adjust contrast, saturation.... will save editing time if you set it right But isn't that only for a jpeg image? It's my understanding that picture styles don't get applied to raw images, only to the embedded jpeg within a raw file for preview, and the output jpeg. If he's shooting raw, then the styles won't matter. If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Frankenheimer Member 45 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Maryland More info | Sep 11, 2012 14:54 | #22 I'd check thru your Flickr pics and decide which ones meet your expectations and than work to bring those photo choices to the portraits.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 12, 2012 00:01 | #23 The Dark Knight wrote in post #14975071 No, both are SOOC outside of some cropping. SOOC as jpeg or RAW? If jpeg, what is sharpening set to in your camera? If RAW then you must apply a bit of sharpening to overcome the softness introduced by the camera's AA filter. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 12, 2012 11:17 | #24 Bob_A wrote in post #14979828 SOOC as jpeg or RAW? If jpeg, what is sharpening set to in your camera? If RAW then you must apply a bit of sharpening to overcome the softness introduced by the camera's AA filter. By the way, ALL SOOC jpeg images are sharpened, even if sharpening is set to the minimum setting. thanks Bob, the first pic is in RAW, second is a jpeg
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CScottIV I should keep some things to myself! More info | Sep 12, 2012 18:26 | #25 The standard focus points are smaller in the viewfinder than they are in reality. It doesn't surprise me that it focused on the bracelet. Spot focus, if you have it, is smaller and may not focus on the bracelet. Charles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 13, 2012 00:07 | #26 Your 2048s on flickr are plenty sharp, displaying every wrinkle and facial peach fuzz. it is your resizing to 1024 via flickr that is causing a mushiness in web display. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 13, 2012 08:37 | #27 The Dark Knight wrote in post #14981376 thanks Bob, the first pic is in RAW, second is a jpeg Unless you've told it to do so the RAW processor doesn't add sharpening, or the defaults won't necessarily add enough. In an old white paper Canon recommended adding USM of 300, 0.3, 0 in Photoshop as a starting point to overcome the softness introduced by the AA filter. However, the real amount of sharpening required depends on the camera since the AA filter doesn't necessarily have the same strength across the entire model line for each brand. The amount required also depends on things like the output size of the image. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kirill Senior Member 728 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Chicago Burbs, IL More info | Sep 13, 2012 10:58 | #28 Did you focus and recompose ?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 13, 2012 13:50 | #29 Kirill wrote in post #14985817 Did you focus and recompose ? On the second picture, yes. On the first one, no. I picked the focus point closest to her
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kirill Senior Member 728 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Chicago Burbs, IL More info | Sep 13, 2012 15:47 | #30 The Dark Knight wrote in post #14986563 On the second picture, yes. On the first one, no. I picked the focus point closest to her If you focus and recompose - you are forcing camera to missfocus:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1588 guests, 116 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||