Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 11 Sep 2012 (Tuesday) 10:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Bridge Export to Hard Drive

 
D ­ Thompson
Goldmember
Avatar
4,062 posts
Likes: 422
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Ky
     
Sep 11, 2012 10:38 |  #1

I use the Image Processor in Bridge (CS6) to create jpegs after I process the RAW's in ACR. It opens and works thru PS. Lately I've been trying out the Export to Hard Drive in Bridge. It seems to work a little faster, doesn't open PS, with pretty much the same options. I have noticed that a few, not all, of the file sizes will be slightly different depending on which of the two methods I use. The only other difference that jumps out is using Image Processor tags them with 300 ppi where the Export doesn't which shouldn't matter. Does anyone know if these two methods are basically the same as far as results? Any advantage of using one over the other?


Dennis
Canon 5D Mk III 5D 20D
I have not yet begun to procrastinate!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsmotril
Goldmember
Avatar
2,543 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 402
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Austin TX
     
Sep 11, 2012 12:54 |  #2

ppi is meanlingless unless you're printing. It is the overall pixel dimension that matters, IE 800x600 pixels. Whether image of that size is set to 72dpi, or 300dpi, it is the same resolution viewed on a computer screen. As far as results, if you are applying output sharpening with the export, they will look different.


Gear List
Galleries: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/smopho/ (external link) --- http://billsmotrilla.z​enfolio.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D ­ Thompson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,062 posts
Likes: 422
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Ky
     
Sep 11, 2012 13:19 |  #3

bsmotril wrote in post #14977185 (external link)
ppi is meanlingless unless you're printing.

Yep, knew that didn't matter but was the only difference I could find. Mainly I was wondering if any major difference in the rendering of the jpeg due to not opening in PS when using the Export panel in Bridge. The Export to HD seems to be extremely fast when making the low-res proofs.


Dennis
Canon 5D Mk III 5D 20D
I have not yet begun to procrastinate!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 11, 2012 21:22 |  #4

I hadn't checked out the Image Processor and the Export in my "new" copy of CS5. I just ran a shot through them both, but something got screwed up by the Image Processor -- it made a much smaller copy (pixel dimensions) than I thought I "told" it to. And, the Export dialog, in which I set a Quality of 8, made a much smaller jpeg file size than I expected, at least compared to the Lightroom Export, dang, back to the drawing board!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
D ­ Thompson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
4,062 posts
Likes: 422
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Georgetown, Ky
     
Sep 11, 2012 21:58 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #5

I've played around a little between Export to Hard Drive and the Image Processor. I converted the same RAW file (2800px by 4200px) with the following results: Export Q8-842kb, Q10-1.71MB. Image Processor Q8-915kb, Q10-1.75MB. According to somebody over at the Adobe forums, this is probably due to differences in the way the metadata is written. Quality should be equal.

If you want to see speed conversions - use the Export, constrain to less than 1024 pixels, untick Render from Fullsize, and set Quality to 8.


Dennis
Canon 5D Mk III 5D 20D
I have not yet begun to procrastinate!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,628 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Bridge Export to Hard Drive
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1131 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.