Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 13 Sep 2012 (Thursday) 13:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

DONT DO IT !!!!

 
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4211
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Sep 13, 2012 13:14 |  #1

Seems the entertainment industry is going to start cracking down on people using music in their business w/o permission from the original artists. A woman from our state just got nailed........Photogra​phers-- you better use royalty free music for your needs. Every attorney that thinks they can make .05 cents will sue your butt off.......read the article

http://intellectual-property.lawyers.com …-Your-Music-Is-Legal.html (external link)


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jetcode
Cream of the Crop
6,235 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2009
Location: West Marin
     
Sep 13, 2012 13:25 |  #2
bannedPermanently

This is not news. ASCAP has been man handling restaurant owners for years now. Our local eatery owes to the tune of $30k. Fat chance that's gonna happen and meanwhile the tunes keep flowing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,737 posts
Likes: 4070
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 13, 2012 13:26 |  #3

Photographers hate it when their photo is ripped off can you blame musicians when they feel the same?


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,374 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1380
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Sep 13, 2012 13:30 |  #4

gjl711 wrote in post #14986437 (external link)
Photographers hate it when their photo is ripped off can you blame musicians when they feel the same?

Well, not so much muscians, but legally a "copyright owner" is a "copyright owner" whether it's one person or a corporation.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cameron ­ Hagen
Senior Member
Avatar
287 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 65
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Cypress, TX
     
Sep 13, 2012 13:33 |  #5

gjl711 wrote in post #14986437 (external link)
Photographers hate it when their photo is ripped off can you blame musicians when they feel the same?

yeah but its a little different..


| 5Dc | 7D | 1D3 | 1Ds3 | 17-40 4.0 | 28 1.8 | 40 2.8 | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 135 2.0 | ∑ 24-70 | ∑ 70-200 OS |
In need of : 300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8390
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Sep 13, 2012 13:41 |  #6

RDKirk wrote in post #14986453 (external link)
Well, not so much muscians, but legally a "copyright owner" is a "copyright owner" whether it's one person or a corporation.

Why not so much with musicians? I don't see a difference. Please explain, as I am interested to see why you think "not so much" with musicians, as compared to photographers.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrushka
"all warm and fuzzy"
Avatar
3,735 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Oct 2007
Location: OC, CA
     
Sep 13, 2012 13:46 |  #7
bannedPermanently

Everyone likes getting something for nothing until it's their product or service people want for free ;-)a


http://www.paradigmpho​tographyoc.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Sep 13, 2012 13:55 |  #8

Cameron Hagen wrote in post #14986472 (external link)
yeah but its a little different..

Oh? How so...?


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Sep 13, 2012 13:56 as a reply to  @ Andrushka's post |  #9

Yeah.. in reality, turn it around. What if an band/musician used your photo on the cover of their CD? I do think there are slight differences, as it's more about the RIAA losing their bucks.. versus a single photog. But.. it's still along the same vein.


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mastamarek
Goldmember
Avatar
1,882 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
     
Sep 13, 2012 13:56 |  #10

well duhhh ... its 2012, Napster is dead and iTunes is rocking full on ;)


[Facebook® (external link)]
[imassmedia.pl (external link)]
[Flickr (external link)]
[My Blog (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikeinctown
Goldmember
2,119 posts
Likes: 235
Joined May 2012
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Sep 13, 2012 14:16 |  #11

jetcode wrote in post #14986431 (external link)
This is not news. ASCAP has been man handling restaurant owners for years now. Our local eatery owes to the tune of $30k. Fat chance that's gonna happen and meanwhile the tunes keep flowing.

A brewing supply house I used to go to had a separate place for brews and music and they clearly had a large sign posted at the door saying if you were a member of the ASCAP or whatever it is called, you weren't welcome and you would be considered trespassing. Because they don't care if you have a live band, or are playing the jukebox.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John37
Senior Member
609 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Sep 13, 2012 14:28 as a reply to  @ mikeinctown's post |  #12

Ya know, in all this, there seems to be a niche that someone should jump on. Why not pair up with local bands? There are literally thousands of bands that would jump at the chance of having their music used on websites, etc.
I think we put too much emphasis on music from the big bands. Local bands make good music too!


"The most endangered species? The honest man!' ~ Neil Peart
5Dii, 5Dc, 135L, 70-200 f2.8, 24-105L, 17-40L, 85 f1.8, 50 f1.8, 430exll, Yongnuo 560ll x 2, wife, 2 kids :cool:
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/dajaphotographs​/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,374 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1380
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Sep 13, 2012 14:31 |  #13

Tom Reichner wrote in post #14986508 (external link)
Why not so much with musicians? I don't see a difference. Please explain, as I am interested to see why you think "not so much" with musicians, as compared to photographers.

To the extent--which will be pointed out by someone sooner or later in this thread--that it's not really the muscians who benefit by the copyright on their work, but rather the corporations.

Edit: Hah! Someone already has!

But as I said, legally a copyright holder is a copyright holder whether an individual or a corporation, so that's not really a point that needs to be argued. As content creators ourselves, it's to our benefit to respect copyright, even if we don't like some of the other entities who also benefit from it.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Deep
Goldmember
Avatar
1,915 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 965
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Upstate NY
     
Sep 13, 2012 15:15 |  #14

Lets not confuse the morality of copyright infringement with the associated absurdly disproportionate damages, particularly when those damages are only awarded when the plaintiff is a big company.


mikedeep.com (external link) - rocket launch photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
watt100
Cream of the Crop
14,021 posts
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2008
     
Sep 13, 2012 16:12 |  #15

umphotography wrote in post #14986394 (external link)
Seems the entertainment industry is going to start cracking down on people using music in their business w/o permission from the original artists.

at least I can sing Happy Birthday on my birthday without paying royalties

oh wait... I can't
http://www.snopes.com/​music/songs/birthday.a​sp (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,622 views & 0 likes for this thread, 29 members have posted to it.
DONT DO IT !!!!
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1806 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.