Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 16 Sep 2012 (Sunday) 13:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Butterfly

 
CHUCK ­ A
Senior Member
358 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 39
Joined Jun 2011
Location: New Jersey USA
     
Sep 16, 2012 13:34 |  #1

This is right out of the camera...no pp. I shot in jpeg L and raw. What would you do to improve?


Canon 5D3, 60D, 70-200 L f4 IS, 17-40L,16-35f4, 24-105L,100 f2.8, 85 f/1.8, 55-250 IS, 400 f/5.6, Ziess 21 2.8, canon 1.4, 430EX www.flickr.com/photos/​maggiesguy (external link), http://charles-aitken.artistwebsites.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hannya
Goldmember
Avatar
1,062 posts
Likes: 66
Joined Apr 2008
Location: UK
     
Sep 16, 2012 13:59 |  #2

Colors are lovely, but it doesn't look pin sharp to me. Just a teensy shame the flower obscures the butterfly, but that's probably being picky! I wish I could get shots like this!


“Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.” ― Henri Cartier-Bresson

Sports Pics (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MavRyder
Senior Member
257 posts
Joined Feb 2011
     
Sep 16, 2012 14:04 as a reply to  @ Hannya's post |  #3

Simply stunning!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeremyBlake
Senior Member
Avatar
532 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Columbus, OH, USA
     
Sep 16, 2012 16:11 |  #4

Love it. I'd sharpen it a bit, though.


flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | Gear | Facebook (external link) | Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,611 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8356
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Sep 16, 2012 17:56 |  #5

The petals of the flower obscure the lower parts of the butterfly, so much so that the beauty / of the butterfly is lost.

If you could have worked this subject for a few minutes before it flew off, perhaps you could have positioned yourself so that the butterfly's legs, antennae, "nose", and lower portion of the wing would not have been obscured at all; making for a more powerful image.

Bonus points if you could do all that plus still manage to line it up so that only the darker green would be in the background (the background on the right side of the image is quite nice, the background on the left side is much less attractive).


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Qbx
Goldmember
3,983 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 545
Joined Dec 2010
     
Sep 16, 2012 19:16 |  #6

I think I'd boost saturation a bit, and as others have said - sharpen.


-- Image Editing OK --

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SJC ­ from ­ VT
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,220 posts
Gallery: 154 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1083
Joined Feb 2009
Location: USA/Northeast
     
Sep 17, 2012 10:16 |  #7

I tried lowering the brightness, increased contrast, and sharpened with the unsharp mask in photoshop elements and it made quite a differance. I think it helped it to pop.


*Sandy* "If we all had positive attitudes...we could change the world"
7D ll and 60D plus some other stuff! My Flickr http://flic.kr/ps/FEPL​p (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

661 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Butterfly
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1340 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.