Pit wrote in post #15008248
Sure the people who have ef-s lenses can easily jump ship, but does canon really care about losing a customer that has a rebel and a kit lens? (they sell those at high value and they will continue to sell more to tourists who want an slr). Both companies want to attract buyers that will eventually start shelling out cash for premium glass. Besides 10-22, 18-55 2.8 and maybe few others there arent that many high value EF-s lenses out there. And the crop users that already have EF lenses will see this as a natural step.
Yes the nikon does look better on paper, but we all want to see these side by side in a shootout. I think it has more than enough features to justify the $2100 price tag, lets just wait to see how it performs as that is really what matters.
All customers are important, Mistreat the people at the low end and they wont stick with you when they're ready to dump serious money...
Example enough, I was a Nikon shooter when I started out, when I got serious I came to Canon because, At the time, Canon offered what I wanted, I felt I really had to replace almost all my Nikon glass because of the wonky compatibility issues I was going to have getting a new camera, so Canon's extensive selection of affordable very good lenses coupled with USM drives and the fact they had IS in more lenses than Nikon was very appealing to me, Lenses like the 100-400 and 70-200 f/4L made my mouth water and were lenses Nikon did not, and still do not, have a real answer for...Not to mention the 17-40L and 24-105L, and no matter how nice the F100 was, My EOS 3 was better in every way shape and form.....God I miss that thing....
What sold me on the switch? The EOS 20D, I had used a D70 in addition to my film gear and when I played with the 20D I just saw a massive gulf between Canon and Nikon's capabilities.. the D70 wasnt a terrible camera, but the 20D was something else... I felt Canon was going to meet my needs in the future far better, and sure enough, when I finally switched over to digital guess what I bought myself? an EOS 30D, the 20D's more refined big brother...
The point is, Nikon at the time was NOT being a competitive company so they lost me when it came time for me to get serious, it took years before they got back into the fight with the D300, a camera I fully admit to lusting over and wanting (Until I layed eyes on the 7D which was everything I wanted from a D300 except jacked up to 11..I frequently cite the three reasons I still shoot Canon as the 7D, 15-85 and 100L, Which were all announced on the same day 3 years ago..Funny aint it?
)