J_TULLAR Goldmember  3,011 posts Likes: 23 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii More info | Sep 17, 2012 14:22 | #1 http://leicarumors.com …-new-leica-products.aspx/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thenextguy Goldmember  More info | Sep 17, 2012 15:05 | #2 |
J_TULLAR THREAD STARTER Goldmember 3,011 posts Likes: 23 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii More info | Sep 17, 2012 15:07 | #3 |
thenextguy Goldmember More info | Sep 17, 2012 15:14 | #4 |
rick_reno Cream of the Crop 44,642 posts Likes: 134 Joined Dec 2010 More info | Sep 17, 2012 15:35 | #5 somehow it costs more to do less
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thenextguy Goldmember More info | Sep 17, 2012 15:39 | #6 |
andrikos Goldmember  1,905 posts Likes: 9 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Stuttgart, Germany More info | Sep 17, 2012 15:44 | #7 Ooh! The Leica M! Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
J_TULLAR THREAD STARTER Goldmember 3,011 posts Likes: 23 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii More info | Sep 17, 2012 15:52 | #8 Ha hipsters cant afford it lol.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shadowblade Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 17, 2012 15:57 | #9 I could have used 36MP, but like everything else about the Leica M.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lamplight Goldmember  1,072 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2004 Location: Bellingham, WA More info | Sep 17, 2012 17:12 | #10 Leica seems to be the only company that makes my ideal digital camera, and yet I could never even dream of affording one. Maybe I could buy a used M9 in another decade or so, assuming I don't need any lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
watt100 Cream of the Crop 14,021 posts Likes: 29 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Sep 17, 2012 18:06 | #11 Lamplight wrote in post #15005334  Leica seems to be the only company that makes my ideal digital camera, and yet I could never even dream of affording one. kinda like a Rolls Royce, if they only made a Rolls for the masses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark0159 I say stupid things all the time  More info | Sep 17, 2012 18:11 | #12 wow the ME at NZ$7613 I don't think so Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!"  More info | Sep 17, 2012 19:52 | #13 Actually I gotta admit the Leica M is the first Leica I'd possibly buy.. Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | Sep 17, 2012 20:00 | #14 I would argue when I bought my F-1s they were IIRC $520 or so. That was the top of the line Canon. Leica M was $1500. Leica M 9 and now the Leica M and Leica Mono are all about the same price as the top of the line Canon and Nikon so it looks like Canon and Nikon have caught up.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 57 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Sep 17, 2012 20:30 | #15 airfrogusmc wrote in post #15006032 I would argue when I bought my F-1s they were IIRC $520 or so. That was the top of the line Canon. Leica M was $1500. Leica M 9 and now the Leica M and Leica Mono are all about the same price as the top of the line Canon and Nikon so it looks like Canon and Nikon have caught up. Allen, the new M is calling you with Live View.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! |
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mariner34 1438 guests, 285 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
