Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 17 Sep 2012 (Monday) 15:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Speeding up photo/video editing

 
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 19, 2012 01:49 |  #16

6.5 what set aside?

More RAM will give you a disk cache, which could be super helpful with large video files or multiple streams.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
Moderator
Avatar
15,101 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 448
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Sep 19, 2012 04:04 |  #17

Ainoko wrote in post #15012525 (external link)
hmmm well I just ran Adobe Premiere with my resource manager running, and during playback it never spikes more than 4gb ram used. I have 8 total, and I checked my preferences in Premiere, and have 6.5 set aside for editing. Is there something I'm missing? Playback is generally fine when it's yellow, but really choppy during red. In yellow my CPU is running at ~50%, and in red it's spiking up to nearly 100%.



What sort of video are you editing?

My RAM usage never used to get above 7GB when I only had 8, now it gets above 10GB while doing the same things.
Rather than using ALL the ram, Premier caches a lot to disc.

However, if your only editing standard def footage, or only have one track in the timeline then 8GB of ram will be enough.

The footage you have that's red, will turn yellow and the footage that's yellow will turn green with an Nvidia card.


flickr (external link)

Have you Calibrated your Monkey lately?

Now more than ever we need to be a community, working together and for each other, as photographers, as lovers of photography and as members of POTN.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hen3Ry
Goldmember
Avatar
1,063 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Aptos, CA, USA
     
Sep 19, 2012 10:02 |  #18

Ainoko wrote in post #15012525 (external link)
hmmm well I just ran Adobe Premiere with my resource manager running, and during playback it never spikes more than 4gb ram used. I have 8 total, and I checked my preferences in Premiere, and have 6.5 set aside for editing. Is there something I'm missing? Playback is generally fine when it's yellow, but really choppy during red. In yellow my CPU is running at ~50%, and in red it's spiking up to nearly 100%.


You probably could use a more recent video card with a stronger GPU, which might assume some of the load that's currently spiking the CPU. I doubt that it makes any difference which one, so long as it's "a bunch" (<== highly technical term) more powerful than your current one, which is fairly outdated.

As you have seen, it's unlikely that RAM is a huge problem, but reducing paging overhead is a good thing, and more RAM will do that, as will putting your paging and any premiere scratch files on an SSD.

Finally, there's an old saying in computers: "Parts is Parts." There's very little performance difference between the top end of two hardware vendor's parts, and they're basically interchageable.

Here's what Tom's Hardware wrote back in June about Nvidia's top card vs Radeon:

This is the latest installment in the cat and mouse game played between AMD and graphics rivals Nvidia.

When Nvidia released the GeForce GTX 680 back in April it became the world's fastest single GPU solution, beating AMD's Radeon HD 7970 by between 5 and 30 percent in the benchmarks. However, by tweaking the stock Radeon HD 7970 a little, AMD has been able to squeeze more power out of the GPU and retake the crown.

The stock Radeon HD 7970 featured a core clocked at 925MHz and a memory tuned to 1375MHz. The "GHz Edition" model sees the core clock bumped to 1000MHz and the memory frequency increased to 1500MHz. This represents an 8 percent core overclock and 9 percent memory overclock compared to the stock Radeon HD 7970.

But that performance increase comes at a price.

A stock Radeon HD 7970 retails for $449 while AMD has slapped a price tag of $490 on the "GHz Edition" model -- which translates into an 11 percent premium over the stock version.


***************
Je n'avais pas besoin de cette hypothèse-là.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Moppie
Moderator
Avatar
15,101 posts
Gallery: 22 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 448
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Akarana, Aotearoa. (Kiwiland)
     
Sep 19, 2012 14:53 |  #19

Hen3Ry wrote in post #15013733 (external link)
You probably could use a more recent video card with a stronger GPU, which might assume some of the load that's currently spiking the CPU. I doubt that it makes any difference which one, so long as it's "a bunch" (<== highly technical term) more powerful than your current one, which is fairly outdated.

As you have seen, it's unlikely that RAM is a huge problem, but reducing paging overhead is a good thing, and more RAM will do that, as will putting your paging and any premiere scratch files on an SSD.

Finally, there's an old saying in computers: "Parts is Parts." There's very little performance difference between the top end of two hardware vendor's parts, and they're basically interchageable.

Here's what Tom's Hardware wrote back in June about Nvidia's top card vs Radeon:



Really?


*Bangs head against desk, rips the top off the empire state building then finds a tall leggy blonde*


Please go and read the whole thread, Adobe Premier does not use any AMD/ATI cards for hardware based gpu acceleration. It only makes use of Nvidia cards.


flickr (external link)

Have you Calibrated your Monkey lately?

Now more than ever we need to be a community, working together and for each other, as photographers, as lovers of photography and as members of POTN.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ainoko
THREAD ­ STARTER
Stupidest Question Award 2008
Avatar
1,406 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
     
Sep 24, 2012 20:17 |  #20

I'd like to get a GPU for around $200... How is something like this?http://www.newegg.com …aspx?Item=N82E1​6814130826 (external link)


Full Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …?p=4846834&post​count=1005

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Sep 26, 2012 11:35 |  #21

Ainoko wrote in post #15037854 (external link)
I'd like to get a GPU for around $200... How is something like this?http://www.newegg.com …aspx?Item=N82E1​6814130826 (external link)

Or there are used GTX 570's all over ebay for less than $200 too.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ainoko
THREAD ­ STARTER
Stupidest Question Award 2008
Avatar
1,406 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington
     
Sep 26, 2012 15:22 |  #22

ben_r_ wrote in post #15045439 (external link)
Or there are used GTX 570's all over ebay for less than $200 too.

Eeeeh I dunno how I feel buying used computer parts on ebay. How do the different series stack up against each other? like the 560 vs 660 series? And the 660 vs 670?


Full Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …?p=4846834&post​count=1005

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ben_r_
-POTN's Three legged Support-
Avatar
15,894 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Sep 26, 2012 15:34 |  #23

Ainoko wrote in post #15046378 (external link)
Eeeeh I dunno how I feel buying used computer parts on ebay. How do the different series stack up against each other? like the 560 vs 660 series? And the 660 vs 670?

Google is your friend there.


[Gear List | Flickr (external link) | My Reviews] /|\ Tripod Leg Protection (external link) /|\
GIVE a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. TEACH a man to fish and he'll eat for a lifetime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,497 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Speeding up photo/video editing
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is slipper1963
1459 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.