Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 17 Sep 2012 (Monday) 23:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sigma 85 1.4 AF

 
Mark
Dammit I need sleep
Avatar
3,386 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Sep 17, 2012 23:09 |  #1

Hi all,

I recently got a Sigma 85 1.4, it works pretty good in One Shot AF as far as I can tell, but on servo... not so much.
It can't track someone walking towards it at walking pace on a 5D3 centre point, in good light.
The (sales) people in the camera shop I bought it from are telling me it's normal for a fast prime to be like that, and it kind of appears to be true, with their 85 1.2 giving a similar performance in an unscientific handheld test indoors with not great light, as well as another sigma on a D800.
But the service guy tested it on a tripod outdoors in better light and thinks it's pretty shocking and made the good point that this is what shooting a catwalk essentially is, so it can't be intended performance.

I'm talking between 2 and 4 out of 15 shots being in focus in this test outdoors. Somehow indoors both the 85 1.2 and sigma gave about 6-7 in focus out of 13, although the sales guy was operating the camera for that so he may not have used the same procedure as me.

What do you think?


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejenner
Goldmember
Avatar
3,867 posts
Gallery: 98 photos
Likes: 1136
Joined Nov 2011
Location: Denver, CO
     
Sep 17, 2012 23:51 |  #2

At f1.4 on FF? Hmm, hard to tell. I think the 50% hit rate would not be way out of line with such a shallow DOF. Holding the focus point on the same spot after focus is achieved seems to help quite a bit, but this is definitely no 70-200L - of course that would be at 2.8 (or smaller) which would/should also significantly increase the hit rate.

How far out are the misses? If it's all over the place with the odd lucky shot, that doesn't sound too good. But if I was trying to track a moving subject I would stop down for sure and still not expect more than 50-80%, but then that's with the 5DII (center point).


Edward Jenner
5DIV, M6, GX1 II, Sig15mm FE, 16-35 F4,TS-E 17, TS-E 24, 35 f2 IS, M11-22, M18-150 ,24-105, T45 1.8VC, 70-200 f4 IS, 70-200 2.8 vII, Sig 85 1.4, 100L, 135L, 400DOII.
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/48305795@N03/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/edward.jenner.372/p​hotos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark
THREAD ­ STARTER
Dammit I need sleep
Avatar
3,386 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Sep 17, 2012 23:58 |  #3

ejenner wrote in post #15007173 (external link)
At f1.4 on FF? Hmm, hard to tell. I think the 50% hit rate would not be way out of line with such a shallow DOF. Holding the focus point on the same spot after focus is achieved seems to help quite a bit, but this is definitely no 70-200L - of course that would be at 2.8 (or smaller) which would/should also significantly increase the hit rate.

How far out are the misses? If it's all over the place with the odd lucky shot, that doesn't sound too good. But if I was trying to track a moving subject I would stop down for sure and still not expect more than 50-80%, but then that's with the 5DII (center point).

Sorry I forgot to mention this is all at f2.8. Some are kinda close but definitely not sharp, others are way off, with a few in focus shots spread around...

All of my tests (no comparison to the 85L was done my way though) was on tripod, with the centre point on the person walking to me's face in continuous burst..

50-80% would be alright for me, this more seems to be 10-50% though... which makes the lens near useless for moving subjects...


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eyalha
Member
224 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Sep 18, 2012 00:29 |  #4

I can tell you that from my experience the Sigma doesn't have the best AF but it shouldn't be that bad, I had 2 copies of this lens before the one I have now, one of them couldn't even lock on focus and the other one was just inconsistent, so you might want to either exchange it, if still possible, or send it in to Sigma


5D2, 24-70L F2.8, Sigma 85 F1.4, Sigma 50 F1.4, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400 F4.5-5.6 II, 430EX II X 2, A few Pocketwizards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark
THREAD ­ STARTER
Dammit I need sleep
Avatar
3,386 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Perth, Australia
     
Sep 18, 2012 00:37 |  #5

eyalha wrote in post #15007288 (external link)
I can tell you that from my experience the Sigma doesn't have the best AF but it shouldn't be that bad, I had 2 copies of this lens before the one I have now, one of them couldn't even lock on focus and the other one was just inconsistent, so you might want to either exchange it, if still possible, or send it in to Sigma

Yeah, that's what I'm thinking. The service guy seemed helpful and said he's going to talk to the Sigma rep, but the salespeople were rather unhelpful not offering exchange or anything.

Do you have any idea if Sigma might do a test for moving subjects when calibrating/repairing a lens?


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eyalha
Member
224 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Sep 18, 2012 00:44 |  #6

To be honest I wouldn't know the first thing about the way Sigma is calibrating the lenses, but from what I hear the usually do a pretty good job.
The way I see it sending it to Sigma couldn't hurt, and would also let you know that you copy is good and then you can decide yourself if it's good enough for your needs


5D2, 24-70L F2.8, Sigma 85 F1.4, Sigma 50 F1.4, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400 F4.5-5.6 II, 430EX II X 2, A few Pocketwizards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,631 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Sigma 85 1.4 AF
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1234 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.