Cheapest way to test that is to rent some lenses if you are concerned your kit lens isn't up to your expectations.
You can also rent another camera body while you are at it just to rule out the body.
Sep 18, 2012 11:49 | #16 Cheapest way to test that is to rent some lenses if you are concerned your kit lens isn't up to your expectations. Phillip - phillipwardphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2012 11:53 | #17 Superdaantje wrote in post #15009273 Invest in knowledge not in equipment. Sorry to say. Looks like a User error ![]() Say it as you will.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2012 11:54 | #18 PLLphotography wrote in post #15009293 Cheapest way to test that is to rent some lenses if you are concerned your kit lens isn't up to your expectations. You can also rent another camera body while you are at it just to rule out the body. That seems to be one of the best options thanks! <3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Superdaantje Senior Member 557 posts Likes: 10 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Netherlands More info | Sep 18, 2012 11:58 | #19 So far I can see on the photo. Seems like a user Error !! Wagner.photography -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
What is your budget?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
That is VERY useful.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nburwell Goldmember 1,265 posts Likes: 11 Joined Oct 2006 Location: Wilmington, DE More info | Sep 18, 2012 13:39 | #22 Superdaantje wrote in post #15009273 Invest in knowledge not in equipment. Sorry to say. Looks like a User error ![]() I have to agree here. I would invest in reading up on some articles online, or better yet, take a trip to your local B&N bookstore and buy a photography book or two. A 5DIII and L lenses are not going to help you at all.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrickR Cream of the Crop 5,935 posts Likes: 115 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Dallas TX More info | Sep 18, 2012 15:05 | #23 The kit lens it ok, but its nothing special. Its not the sharpness king. My junk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Simplistic Goldmember 1,443 posts Likes: 15 Joined May 2012 Location: Los Angeles More info | Sep 18, 2012 15:14 | #24 Here is the answer you wish one of us will tell you: 5D II | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 | Canon 85 f/1.8 | Canon 24-105 f/4 L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2012 15:19 | #25 Exomonkeyman wrote in post #15009775 That is VERY useful. Thanks. I will if any thing look at the lenses above. But i probably won't go for a 5D MK II cause i don't see the point. When there's only better Mega pixels for photos. And a better body build. ![]() you do realize the 5D II has been used not only for independent films, but also to shoot actual TV shows? I'm pretty sure a episode of House was filmed entirely with 5D IIs. Phillip - phillipwardphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saintz Senior Member 428 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Sep 18, 2012 16:03 | #26 Do you have a filter on the 18-55? If so, take it off. Sony A6000 | 18-55 | 16-50 | 50 f1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark0159 I say stupid things all the time More info | Sep 18, 2012 16:09 | #27 get the 6D+kit lens. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
saintz Senior Member 428 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | Sep 18, 2012 16:22 | #28 theflyingkiwi wrote in post #15010527 get the 6D+kit lens. Kylemorgan88 wrote in post #15009660 If this is true I recommend selling your kit lens and taking this cash along with your budgeted funds and purchasing the below prime lenses. If you are shooting a lot of video outdoors, also pick up a variable nd filter. -Sigma 30mm 1.4 $375 used -Canon 50mm 1.4 $325 used -Canon 85mm 1.8 $315 used -Fader ND Mark ii $125 new If your budget is closer to $1.5K or $2K I recommend selling your 60d and purchasing a used 5d mkii or a 70-200 f4 IS in addition to the lenses above. I promise you will see an enormous IQ improvement if you follow the above suggestions. This is really not the answer. If he is getting terrible results from a 60D, a more expensive camera is not the answer. Something is clearly wrong. Sony A6000 | 18-55 | 16-50 | 50 f1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mark0159 I say stupid things all the time More info | Sep 18, 2012 16:40 | #29 saintz wrote in post #15010590 This is really not the answer. If he is getting terrible results from a 60D, a more expensive camera is not the answer. Something is clearly wrong. your right. it would be good to have some decent tests. It could be a case that there's a problem with the lens or the camera is front/back focusing. Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
auto-clicker Senior Member 819 posts Likes: 37 Joined Dec 2009 More info | Sep 18, 2012 16:47 | #30 You should look into getting some new "STM" lenses which are reasonably priced and specifically designed for Canon's video capabilities.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2845 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||