Sep 18, 2012 13:47 | #1 Well I love my current combo...35L and 200L. Taylor - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2012 13:49 | #3 Yeah, I'm not really opposed to it either. I seem to really like the 50mm focal on my crop. Not sure why. I hear good things about the Sigma 50 Taylor - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Sep 18, 2012 13:51 | #4 |
Sep 18, 2012 13:54 | #5 tkbslc wrote in post #15009875  35mm f2? Thats not a bad idea, thats one lens though I hardly ever hear anything about. Taylor - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cameradude Senior Member 275 posts Joined Jan 2011 More info | The new sigma 35 and the 10-20 for the 35L 7D | Canon EF-S 17-55 2.8 | Sigma EF-S 30 1.4 | Canon 85 1.8 | Canon 135 2.0 L | 430EX | TT Speed Demon | Sony RX100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2012 14:33 | #7 There's a sigma 35? Taylor - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid  More info | Sep 18, 2012 15:14 | #8 Taylor02GT wrote in post #15010042 There's a sigma 35? it was just announced yesterday...no price though yet...and who knows when it'll be available Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2012 15:17 | #9 Eh, probably more than i want to spend. Taylor - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
First thing I would never buy a 35L for a cropcam, but this is your personal choice, it's one of the holy trinity on fullframe and one of my best lenses I would ever sell. Sony A7 III | Metabones V | Sigma 35 1.4 Art | Sigma 85 1.4 Art | 70-200 2.8L II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2012 15:37 | #11 CanonYouCan wrote in post #15010283 First thing I would never buy a 35L for a cropcam, but this is your personal choice, it's one of the holy trinity on fullframe and one of my best lenses I would ever sell. Comming from a 35 1.4L I would go to the Canon EF-S 10-22, the best UWA for crop, this step seems more logic. And as a fast lens you should re-buy Sigma 30 1.4  By the way : had the 200 2.8L too in past, perfect IQ and compact but o so unhandy, I hate long primes as you need too much room, just too limited, if I would ever buy again a tele it would be only the 100-400L I absolutely love the 35L on the crop really, I really enjoy it. I just don't justify its use enough to keep it. My intention used to be to buy a 5DII after the 5DIII came out but my priorities have since changed drastically.  Forgestar F14 | Gunmetal 3 by taylorhockman, on FlickrTaylor - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Numenorean Cream of the Crop 5,013 posts Likes: 28 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Sep 18, 2012 15:41 | #12 No...you can pry the 35L out of my cold, dead hands. It would break up my trinity. Of course...I do have plenty of other lenses to pick from lol.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jermainek Senior Member 253 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2010 Location: England, UK More info | Sep 18, 2012 17:33 | #13 CanonYouCan wrote in post #15010283 First thing I would never buy a 35L for a cropcam, but this is your personal choice, it's one of the holy trinity on fullframe and one of my best lenses I would ever sell. Comming from a 35 1.4L I would go to the Canon EF-S 10-22, the best UWA for crop, this step seems more logic. And as a fast lens you should re-buy Sigma 30 1.4 By the way : had the 200 2.8L too in past, perfect IQ and compact but o so unhandy, I hate long primes as you need too much room, just too limited, if I would ever buy again a tele it would be only the 100-400L Why wouldn't you buy a 35L for a crop camera...? As long as you understand that you get a similar FOV to a 50 on a FF then I see no reason why you wouldn't... EOS R | 24-70 L II | 70-200 f2.8 L IS II | Jermaine Kelly Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kiwikat Goldmember  1,024 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Appleton, WI More info | Sep 18, 2012 17:36 | #14 Ditch the 50D and get a full frame camera. 35 is magic on full frame. "Would you really want to be the Canon rep responsible for dealing with POTN?" -FlyingPhotog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yalemba Senior Member  635 posts Joined Sep 2003 More info | Sep 18, 2012 18:18 | #15 Taylor02GT wrote in post #15009853 Well I love my current combo...35L and 200L. Been wanting to pick up a 10-20 to walk around with (hiking, traveling, auto events). Figure I could ditch the 35L and pick up two lenses. Thinking about selling the 35L and picking up either a Canon 28 1.8 or Sigma 50. Anyone switched away from the 35L for the Canon 28 or Sig 50? 24-70 II Cameras: 1DX, 1Ds Mark III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 974 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
