We are having a baby tomorrow and was just curious if a 50mm 1.8 will do in the operating room ( it's a c section). My 35mm is out being repaired.
I have a kit lens as well but with the lighting I was thinking the 50mm
Thanks
russ925 Member 223 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2011 Location: Long Island, NY More info | Sep 18, 2012 19:19 | #1 We are having a baby tomorrow and was just curious if a 50mm 1.8 will do in the operating room ( it's a c section). My 35mm is out being repaired. T3 gripped / Tamron 17-50 2.8 / Tamron 70-300 VC / Rokinon 8mm fisheye / Canon 430EXII Flash
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2012 19:31 | #2 On a crop camera, 50mm is going to be much too tight IMO. Sure you could always take a few steps back, but in an OR you aren't going to have tons of space. I think you'd be better off with the 18055 and using the 430EX for bounce flash. With the impending forum closure, please consider joining the unofficial adjunct to the POTN forum, The POTN Forum Facebook Group
LOG IN TO REPLY |
L.J.G. "Not brigth enough" More info | Sep 18, 2012 19:40 | #3 Yep, 50 on a crop is a tad long so hopefully you will be able to get right back, if not you are stuffed. There is usually a fair bit of light in the delivery room so natural light is the go, in fact there is no way I would subject a new born to flash photography even using bounce. They have just come into the world and are sensitive to the light as it is. I remember my first born squinting and closing his little eyes because it was the first time he had seen anything that bright. The other thing is you are going to be so gobsmacked photography is probably going to be one of the last things going through your head!! There will be plenty of opportunity in the days after the birth. Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffreyG "my bits and pieces are all hard" More info | Sep 18, 2012 19:43 | #4 Take the 50, but that's tighter than I would like. So take the 18-55 and the 430EX as well. People have wierd notions about the fragility of babies, but a half dozen shots of a newborn with bounced flash isn't going to hurt them. My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/photos/jngirbach/sets/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2012 19:43 | #5 L.J.G. wrote in post #15011428 Yep, 50 on a crop is a tad long so hopefully you will be able to get right back, if not you are stuffed. There is usually a fair bit of light in the delivery room so natural light is the go, in fact there is no way I would subject a new born to flash photography even using bounce. They have just come into the world and are sensitive to the light as it is. I remember my first born squinting and closing his little eyes because it was the first time he had seen anything that bright. The other thing is you are going to be so gobsmacked photography is probably going to be one of the last things going through your head!! There will be plenty of opportunity in the days after the birth. Not sure why I didn't think about this right away, but I agree 100%. With the impending forum closure, please consider joining the unofficial adjunct to the POTN forum, The POTN Forum Facebook Group
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scatterbrained Cream of the Crop 8,511 posts Gallery: 267 photos Best ofs: 12 Likes: 4607 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan More info | Sep 18, 2012 20:00 | #6 In the actual delivery room a flash won't be necessary. That place will be very well lit. I would use the 18-55 there and use the 50mm in the maternity room. You'll need something fast in there, and using a longer focal length (50mm) won't be too much of a detriment as nothing is moving very quickly. VanillaImaging.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2012 20:03 | #7 I used my 24-105 with a bounced flash. Worked great. Most of the ambient light was from a huge window and a few very directional spot lights.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2012 20:14 | #8 This is the second time around at a different hospital. The last time the operating room was huge. T3 gripped / Tamron 17-50 2.8 / Tamron 70-300 VC / Rokinon 8mm fisheye / Canon 430EXII Flash
LOG IN TO REPLY |
deveraux Senior Member More info | Sep 18, 2012 20:18 | #9 I used the 16-35 when my first one was born, and although a c-section is different from a natural, there should be ample light in the OR. I am sure if you asked one of the nurses, they could turn one of the lights toward your baby for a few quick snaps. www.ReicherStudios.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
peterbj7 Goldmember 3,123 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: A Caribbean island in Belize and occasionally UK More info | Sep 18, 2012 20:26 | #10 So as not to restrict the DoF too much I'd go for the zoom and use bounce flash if necessary. The 50 wide open will be very difficult to focus usefully. 5D & 7D (both gripped), 24-105L, 100-400L, 15-85, 50 f1.8, Tamron 28-75, Sigma 12-24, G10, EX-Z55 & U/W housing, A1+10 lenses, tripods, lighting gear, etc. etc.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bumgardnern Senior Member 977 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Nashvegas More info | Sep 18, 2012 22:14 | #11 I used a 24L in the delivery room when my daughter was born. We had a ton of light in the delivery room. The nurses and doctor knew that I was a commercial photographer and adjusted some lights for me and stuff...With your kit I would bring the 18-55 into the OR.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kf095 Out buying Wheaties More info | Good luck! M-E and ME blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ceriltheblade Goldmember 2,484 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2007 Location: middle east More info | Sep 19, 2012 10:31 | #13 after being in multiple delivery and operating rooms and delivering a fair number of babies myself, I would say that the 18-55 would fit better. 7D/5dIII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikeinctown Goldmember 2,119 posts Likes: 235 Joined May 2012 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Sep 19, 2012 12:22 | #14 Both my kids were C-section and i couldn't imagine that with the clothes I had to wear, mask, shoe coverings, etc that they would let me walk in with a large non sterile item like that. Wow...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 19, 2012 12:24 | #15 Being a new dad twice in a little over a years time, I would have to say I have a differing opinion on this. If there is not a life threatening issue with the baby or momma I can honestly say my first concern is not whether or not the staff is annoyed by a flash. You guys might deliver babies every day but I will only be in that position a couple times in my life and Ill be taking pictures. ceriltheblade wrote in post #15013847 after being in multiple delivery and operating rooms and delivering a fair number of babies myself, I would say that the 18-55 would fit better. a flash annoys the baby and, honestly, the staff too. the baby when s/he comes out will have a full staff taking him to examine him, APGARS and whatnot. More light - bounced or otherwise might be...not welcome. I know that it annoyed the **** out of me. And in the past, we requested not to bring flashes since there was a case of a broken flash which threw a spark around lines with oxygen...but that was before my time.... just my 2cents Lake Superior and North Shore Landscape Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1146 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||