Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 25 Dec 2005 (Sunday) 23:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What kind of setup is best for action sports shooting?

 
grego
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,819 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: UCLA
     
Dec 26, 2005 23:17 as a reply to  @ post 1026944 |  #16

CyberDyneSystems wrote:
The ultimate sports set up would be a 1D MkII with a 300mm f/28

Come on Cyberdyne, you said ultimate.

Ultimate:

2x 1D Mark II
70-200 f/2.8 IS
300 f/2.8

:p


Go UCLA (external link)!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.com (external link)SportsShooter (external link)|Flickr (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Dec 26, 2005 23:45 |  #17

But I can only shoot with one at a time!!!,.

....and really,... ultimate would include 400mm f/2.8L IS and 200mm f/1.8L ;)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grego
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,819 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: UCLA
     
Dec 26, 2005 23:50 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #18

CyberDyneSystems wrote:
But I can only shoot with one at a time!!!,.

....and really,... ultimate would include 400mm f/2.8L IS and 200mm f/1.8L ;)

True, true. Well having all of them as options, always depending upon the sports. :p


Go UCLA (external link)!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.com (external link)SportsShooter (external link)|Flickr (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ACDCROCKS
321 123 33
Avatar
2,931 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: in your attic
     
Dec 27, 2005 01:03 as a reply to  @ grego's post |  #19

grego wrote:
Come on Cyberdyne, you said ultimate.

Ultimate:

2x 1D Mark II
70-200 f/2.8 IS
300 f/2.8

:p

Wrong for a sports photog, ... I don't know what you guys are thinking but heres my thoughts ;)As a sports photographer, I would recomend Mark II with 24-70MM 2.8 for close shots such as catches......Mark II With 70-2002.8 IS for far away,2 580EX Flashes, 8 spare batteries , 2 spare charged battery for the Marks with Charger ,Radio Shack 15 Min Charger, Monopod with 400M 2.8 IS With assistant:p, Dell Laptop, cell phone, and lots of Flash cards and Credentials, now this is the "ultimate"you guys really didn't mention the above what a sports Photog really needs other than fast primes...But what also would be ultimate is if Canon made a 600MM F1.8 with IS and capable of traveling.


canon weight ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dave_G
Goldmember
Avatar
3,621 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
     
Dec 27, 2005 08:00 |  #20

you ever tried photgraphing sports ACDC?

....Nikon drivers :) hahahaha


Skoda Fabia vRS SE| Don't make a 70-200 thread | Pan Masterâ„¢ © Allen Mead | Skodalover |Hippopotomonstrosesqui​ppedaliophobia- Fear of long words... | now with 17s, a turbo, rear tints, dual climate, cruise... must be a new company car

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ACDCROCKS
321 123 33
Avatar
2,931 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: in your attic
     
Dec 27, 2005 17:20 as a reply to  @ Dave_G's post |  #21

Dave_G wrote:
you ever tried photgraphing sports ACDC?

....Nikon drivers :) hahahaha

I do it all the time for a professional and Yearbook.
I shoot Football Peewee- Varsity, college next year.Baseball,volleyba​ll,basketball,track,bo​wling etc.


canon weight ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grego
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,819 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: UCLA
     
Dec 27, 2005 20:17 as a reply to  @ ACDCROCKS's post |  #22

ACDCROCKS wrote:
Wrong for a sports photog, ... I don't know what you guys are thinking but heres my thoughts ;)As a sports photographer, I would recomend Mark II with 24-70MM 2.8 for close shots such as catches......Mark II With 70-2002.8 IS for far away,2 580EX Flashes, 8 spare batteries , 2 spare charged battery for the Marks with Charger ,Radio Shack 15 Min Charger, Monopod with 400M 2.8 IS With assistant:p, Dell Laptop, cell phone, and lots of Flash cards and Credentials, now this is the "ultimate"you guys really didn't mention the above what a sports Photog really needs other than fast primes...But what also would be ultimate is if Canon made a 600MM F1.8 with IS and capable of traveling.

I guess I was still being reasonably realistic, but if we want to go Sports Illustrated Ultimate.

Multiple 1DMKII bodies with primes(600,500,400,300​) depending upon the event paired with 70-200 2.8 IS along with 16-35 and 24-70 around.

Then the other stuff you mention and one guy who carries around all his equipment.


Go UCLA (external link)!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.com (external link)SportsShooter (external link)|Flickr (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ACDCROCKS
321 123 33
Avatar
2,931 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: in your attic
     
Dec 27, 2005 20:41 as a reply to  @ grego's post |  #23

grego wrote:
Multiple 1DMKII bodies with primes(600,500,400,300​) depending upon the event paired with 70-200 2.8 IS along with 16-35 and 24-70 around.

.

Thats too much stuff ;) that will drag With weight you unless you have an assistant, which is already carrying your bag, laptop, and the 400MM2.8 IS.


canon weight ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Croasdail
making stuff up
Avatar
8,134 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 899
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North Carolina and Toronto
     
Dec 27, 2005 21:15 |  #24

ACDC..... share some of your sports shots ... all I have seen was your "volleyball is easy" post unless I may have missed some others. Plenty of trains... just not many sports shots. Common - quite holding back on us here.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grego
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,819 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: UCLA
     
Dec 27, 2005 23:39 as a reply to  @ ACDCROCKS's post |  #25

ACDCROCKS wrote:
Thats too much stuff ;) that will drag With weight you unless you have an assistant, which is already carrying your bag, laptop, and the 400MM2.8 IS.

Who's to say it's just one slave, err I mean assistant.

I'd say probably 4 bodies on hand(2 with the camera man), and the rest with the other lens. :)


Go UCLA (external link)!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.com (external link)SportsShooter (external link)|Flickr (external link)|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ACDCROCKS
321 123 33
Avatar
2,931 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: in your attic
     
Dec 27, 2005 23:51 as a reply to  @ Croasdail's post |  #26

Croasdail wrote:
ACDC..... share some of your sports shots ... all I have seen was your "volleyball is easy" post unless I may have missed some others. Plenty of trains... just not many sports shots. Common - quite holding back on us here.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=108949
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=104449
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=104453
theres a few threads, all from the Noink and 50MM (was saving up for a Canon 20D, Canon 70-200IS, 580EX Etc, and still am... So the 50M was the last lens I bought from Nikon, I figure I should get it instead of waisting my time getting dark/horrble shots ;),


canon weight ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ACDCROCKS
321 123 33
Avatar
2,931 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: in your attic
     
Dec 28, 2005 00:21 as a reply to  @ grego's post |  #27

grego wrote:
Who's to say it's just one slave, err I mean assistant.

I'd say probably 4 bodies on hand(2 with the camera man), and the rest with the other lens. :)

i've been/still an assistant , it's not fun lol, you move 5 feet, stop for a few minutes, move 10 feet stop, Drink Sir? move 5 feet stop. 15LBS of glass and everything you would need to survive for the next month on a photographic shoot ;)....Man....it knocks the heck out ya, your spine litterly kills. :rolleyes:
At the football games, mud gets all over you nice, brand new reeboks, and a cowinsidence you wear tan pants. Freezy cold 32F standing on a sideslines, nothing like it, and get paid for it, but wait I just ruined a pair of reeboks;)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


canon weight ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
danphoto1
Senior Member
Avatar
498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Dec 28, 2005 22:00 |  #28

I use a 1d and a 1DMKII 70-200 f2.8 lens Sigma 120-300 2.8 and 100-400 L lens as wellas a number of others. If you want to shoot sports get ready to lay out a lotof money for lenses. There is no camera as good as the 1D or 1DmkII or a MKII N Ithey focus faster and just bang out the shots. The 20D is an ok compromise but you will miss more shots with it depending upon what sport you are shooting. More of the great shots here or anywhere shot by pros use those 1D varity. it is a heavy big camera but it is tought and durable and made to shot sports in almost any condition. Good luck wiht what ever you cpome up with. I can tell you this once you use a 1D you will want one.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Spearin
Senior Member
547 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
     
Dec 28, 2005 22:40 |  #29

I mainly shoot sports and have been deciding for the past few months on what is best for what I need.

Today I just ordered the 20D and the 85mm f/1.8 -- from what I hear, the latter is excellent for indoor sports because of its speed... and also it's pretty darn sharp. Since it's winter, I'll mostly be shooting indoor sports (volleyball, basketball, hockey, soccer, track & field), but once it warms up I'll be investing in either a 135mm f/2.0L or a 70-200mm f/2.8L -- both quality lenses.

From what I've researched, the 20D is the way to go for sports if you can't afford a 1D series body.


- Andrew, Photojournalist
portfolio (external link) || journal (external link) || Sports Shooter (external link) || flickr (external link)
EOS 20D w/ BGE2 grip, 16-35mm f/2.8L, 35mm f/2, 85mm f/1.8, 70-200mm f/2.8L, 1.4x II extender, Speedlite 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ACDCROCKS
321 123 33
Avatar
2,931 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: in your attic
     
Dec 28, 2005 23:06 as a reply to  @ Spearin's post |  #30

Spearin wrote:
I mainly shoot sports and have been deciding for the past few months on what is best for what I need.

Today I just ordered the 20D and the 85mm f/1.8 -- from what I hear, the latter is excellent for indoor sports because of its speed... and also it's pretty darn sharp. Since it's winter, I'll mostly be shooting indoor sports (volleyball, basketball, hockey, soccer, track & field), but once it warms up I'll be investing in either a 135mm f/2.0L or a 70-200mm f/2.8L -- both quality lenses.

From what I've researched, the 20D is the way to go for sports if you can't afford a 1D series body.

then once you get a 20d, money goes toward a 1D series lol.;)


canon weight ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

9,836 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
What kind of setup is best for action sports shooting?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is NekoZ8
1187 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.