The ultimate sports set up would be a 1D MkII with a 300mm f/28
Come on Cyberdyne, you said ultimate.
Ultimate:
2x 1D Mark II
70-200 f/2.8 IS
300 f/2.8
:p
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | CyberDyneSystems wrote: The ultimate sports set up would be a 1D MkII with a 300mm f/28 Come on Cyberdyne, you said ultimate. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Dec 26, 2005 23:45 | #17 But I can only shoot with one at a time!!!,. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | CyberDyneSystems wrote: But I can only shoot with one at a time!!!,. ....and really,... ultimate would include 400mm f/2.8L IS and 200mm f/1.8L ![]() True, true. Well having all of them as options, always depending upon the sports. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ACDCROCKS 321 123 33 2,931 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: in your attic More info | grego wrote: Come on Cyberdyne, you said ultimate. Ultimate: 2x 1D Mark II 70-200 f/2.8 IS 300 f/2.8 :p Wrong for a sports photog, ... I don't know what you guys are thinking but heres my thoughts canon weight
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dave_G Goldmember 3,621 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom More info | Dec 27, 2005 08:00 | #20 you ever tried photgraphing sports ACDC? Skoda Fabia vRS SE| Don't make a 70-200 thread | Pan Master™ © Allen Mead | Skodalover |Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia- Fear of long words... | now with 17s, a turbo, rear tints, dual climate, cruise... must be a new company car
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ACDCROCKS 321 123 33 2,931 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: in your attic More info | Dave_G wrote: you ever tried photgraphing sports ACDC? ....Nikon drivers hahahahaI do it all the time for a professional and Yearbook. canon weight
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | ACDCROCKS wrote: Wrong for a sports photog, ... I don't know what you guys are thinking but heres my thoughts As a sports photographer, I would recomend Mark II with 24-70MM 2.8 for close shots such as catches......Mark II With 70-2002.8 IS for far away,2 580EX Flashes, 8 spare batteries , 2 spare charged battery for the Marks with Charger ,Radio Shack 15 Min Charger, Monopod with 400M 2.8 IS With assistant:p, Dell Laptop, cell phone, and lots of Flash cards and Credentials, now this is the "ultimate"you guys really didn't mention the above what a sports Photog really needs other than fast primes...But what also would be ultimate is if Canon made a 600MM F1.8 with IS and capable of traveling.I guess I was still being reasonably realistic, but if we want to go Sports Illustrated Ultimate. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ACDCROCKS 321 123 33 2,931 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: in your attic More info | grego wrote: Multiple 1DMKII bodies with primes(600,500,400,300) depending upon the event paired with 70-200 2.8 IS along with 16-35 and 24-70 around. . Thats too much stuff canon weight
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Croasdail making stuff up More info | Dec 27, 2005 21:15 | #24 ACDC..... share some of your sports shots ... all I have seen was your "volleyball is easy" post unless I may have missed some others. Plenty of trains... just not many sports shots. Common - quite holding back on us here.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
grego Cream of the Crop 8,819 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: UCLA More info | ACDCROCKS wrote: Thats too much stuff that will drag With weight you unless you have an assistant, which is already carrying your bag, laptop, and the 400MM2.8 IS.Who's to say it's just one slave, err I mean assistant. Go UCLA
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ACDCROCKS 321 123 33 2,931 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: in your attic More info | Croasdail wrote: ACDC..... share some of your sports shots ... all I have seen was your "volleyball is easy" post unless I may have missed some others. Plenty of trains... just not many sports shots. Common - quite holding back on us here. https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=108949 canon weight
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ACDCROCKS 321 123 33 2,931 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: in your attic More info | grego wrote: Who's to say it's just one slave, err I mean assistant. I'd say probably 4 bodies on hand(2 with the camera man), and the rest with the other lens. ![]() i've been/still an assistant , it's not fun lol, you move 5 feet, stop for a few minutes, move 10 feet stop, Drink Sir? move 5 feet stop. 15LBS of glass and everything you would need to survive for the next month on a photographic shoot canon weight
LOG IN TO REPLY |
danphoto1 Senior Member 498 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2003 Location: Rhode Island USA More info | Dec 28, 2005 22:00 | #28 I use a 1d and a 1DMKII 70-200 f2.8 lens Sigma 120-300 2.8 and 100-400 L lens as wellas a number of others. If you want to shoot sports get ready to lay out a lotof money for lenses. There is no camera as good as the 1D or 1DmkII or a MKII N Ithey focus faster and just bang out the shots. The 20D is an ok compromise but you will miss more shots with it depending upon what sport you are shooting. More of the great shots here or anywhere shot by pros use those 1D varity. it is a heavy big camera but it is tought and durable and made to shot sports in almost any condition. Good luck wiht what ever you cpome up with. I can tell you this once you use a 1D you will want one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spearin Senior Member 547 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada More info | Dec 28, 2005 22:40 | #29 I mainly shoot sports and have been deciding for the past few months on what is best for what I need. - Andrew, Photojournalist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ACDCROCKS 321 123 33 2,931 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2005 Location: in your attic More info | Spearin wrote: I mainly shoot sports and have been deciding for the past few months on what is best for what I need. Today I just ordered the 20D and the 85mm f/1.8 -- from what I hear, the latter is excellent for indoor sports because of its speed... and also it's pretty darn sharp. Since it's winter, I'll mostly be shooting indoor sports (volleyball, basketball, hockey, soccer, track & field), but once it warms up I'll be investing in either a 135mm f/2.0L or a 70-200mm f/2.8L -- both quality lenses. From what I've researched, the 20D is the way to go for sports if you can't afford a 1D series body. then once you get a 20d, money goes toward a 1D series lol. canon weight
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is NekoZ8 1187 guests, 109 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||