He is also the CEO of Anal Probe Corporation.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/analprobe/about.htm![]()
DavidR Goldmember More info | He is also the CEO of Anal Probe Corporation. Sony a9II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SMP_Homer Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 19, 2012 13:45 | #32 MikeWa wrote in post #15014609 Yes you are right. I was just comparing your home page to his. Hmmm. Mike mine is way better.... or you made that up... EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
smythie I wasn't even trying More info | Sep 19, 2012 13:47 | #33 DavidR wrote in post #15014761 He is also the CEO of Anal Probe Corporation. http://www.kenrockwell.com/analprobe/about.htm What the? Has someone managed to upload a subsite on his domain? Or is KR's sense of humour that twisted?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BrickR Cream of the Crop 5,935 posts Likes: 115 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Dallas TX More info | Sep 19, 2012 15:13 | #34 I find Ken knows an awful lot about a camera he hasn't actually used.... He's amazing! My junk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 19, 2012 15:26 | #35 smythie wrote in post #15014798 What the? Has someone managed to upload a subsite on his domain? Or is KR's sense of humour that twisted? I would ask MikeWa, as there's a fair chance he's a KR sock. 1D MkIV | 1D MkIII | 550D w/grip & ML| EF 70-200mm f2.8L| EF 24-105mm f4L IS | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC | 430EXii | EF 50mm f1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thallikar Senior Member 323 posts Joined Nov 2011 More info | Sep 19, 2012 15:43 | #36 BrickR wrote in post #15015239 I find Ken knows an awful lot about a camera he hasn't actually used.... He's amazing! Yup. Exactly. Yesterday, on his site, I read that 6D was the best DSLR. Then, his exifs for photos taken with 6D were all taken with 5D3. Just because he wanted to rush his website doesn't mean he should post false info. http://500px.com/thallikar
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1Tanker Goldmember 4,470 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction More info | Sep 19, 2012 16:18 | #37 thallikar wrote in post #15015377 Yup. Exactly. Yesterday, on his site, I read that 6D was the best DSLR. Then, his exifs for photos taken with 6D were all taken with 5D3. Just because he wanted to rush his website doesn't mean he should post false info. Well..in the film industry (that he's always bragging about), that would be called a trailer. Kel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MikeWa Senior Member More info | Sep 19, 2012 16:26 | #38 Sorry guys I just call them like I see them. So far he seems to be walking the walk while the rest of you are talking the talk. So not to be called a troll I will just back out and let you guys hammer me. Mike...G9; 7D; 7D Mark II; EF-S 10-22mm; EF-S 18-135mm IS STM; EF 28-300mm F3.5-5.6L; EF 70-300mm IS USM; EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS-II; EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS; EXT 1.4-II & 2.0-III; The more I learn the less I know.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
andrikos Goldmember 1,905 posts Likes: 9 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Stuttgart, Germany More info | Sep 19, 2012 16:32 | #39 Why did you make me click? Think new Canon lenses are overpriced? Lots (and lots) of data will set you free!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ching Goldmember 1,370 posts Joined Apr 2010 More info | Sep 19, 2012 16:38 | #40 Look at all the traffic he is getting now Nikon D800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 19, 2012 16:56 | #41 Yeah, I admit I did have to check out the two pages of bizarre content. Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GoldCoast Member 38 posts Joined Dec 2011 Location: Burson, Ca More info | Sep 19, 2012 17:35 | #42 If everyone sends him $100.00 he will do a excellant review on the old Brownie Hawkeye ( no pixels, no focus points, no interchangeable lenses, no memory cards, etc. I can hardly wait to read it!!!!!!!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Irfan Member 131 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: Columbus, OH More info | Sep 20, 2012 06:15 | #43 personally, i enjoy his review, and enjoy his commentary on the specs not mattering. I find myself pixel peeping and spec checking all the time, and i dont spend nearly enough time shooting and printing. its refreshing to read stuff that tells you to quit doing that and just go take pictures...and he explains quirks and annoyances in UI pretty well. there are a million different objective review sites to read if thats all you want... I like the subjective ones.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SirStuey Senior Member 284 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2009 More info | Sep 20, 2012 10:33 | #44 DavidR wrote in post #15014622 He definitely post his opinions. ![]() http://www.kenrockwell.com/ri/WhereDoBabiesComeFrom.htm umm....???????????????
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ceremus Senior Member 266 posts Joined Jun 2012 Location: Southeastern Michigan More info | Sep 20, 2012 11:01 | #45 MikeWa wrote in post #15015580 Sorry guys I just call them like I see them. So far he seems to be walking the walk while the rest of you are talking the talk. So not to be called a troll I will just back out and let you guys hammer me. Mike My Ken Rockwell "haha WTF this moron has no idea what he's talking about" moment was when adovcated that everyone shoot JPEG for everything and how much RAW sucks and you should never use it
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 898 guests, 169 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||