Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 19 Sep 2012 (Wednesday) 13:19
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Upgrade camera body or lens?

 
fotomae
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Sep 2012
     
Sep 19, 2012 13:19 |  #1

I'm thinking about upgrading either my camera body or lens. I am not a professional photographer by any means, but I do enjoy photography.

My current set up is this:

Digital Rebel (the very first model that came out - it's old!)
the lens that came with it (not even sure what it is - never used it)
50mm f/1.4
28-135mm f/3.5-5.6

Would it be better to invest in a new body (say, the 7D) and use my current lenses, or to use my current rebel and get a new lens (say, 24-70mm f/2.4 or 70-200mm f/2.8)?

I photograph my children, take family portraits, and am considering taking sports team/individual portraits for our kids' teams.

Thanks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Dark ­ Knight
Goldmember
1,194 posts
Likes: 49
Joined Apr 2012
     
Sep 19, 2012 13:30 |  #2

I think in this case a body upgrade is in order. I think you mean the 300D (I had to google it). I think any entry level body you get now will be a marked improvement in all areas.

I'd get a T3i (or T2i if you can find one) body only, and then also invest in new/ better lenses that suit your needs.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ddk632
Goldmember
Avatar
1,606 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 26
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Aventura, FL
     
Sep 19, 2012 13:36 |  #3

I have an XTi, so you have me beat with your original Digital Rebel.

One thing I'd say is that the high ISO performance on these cameras sucks. I have always been into nature and landscape, so it didn't matter. However now with my kids and shooting indoors more often, I find that even with my Sigma 30mm f/1.4 I need to bump the ISO to keep shutter speeds down or risk blurry images, and in turn some of the shots tend to have more noise.

What helped me with this was actually not on your list, but I'll throw in the suggestion: I got a an external flash (580EXII) and it's made a world of difference. I can get nice shots indoors without blowing out my kids faces with the on-camera flash, and haven't had to bump the ISO quite so high as a result.

So in your shoes, I'd almost say for the kids and family portraits, especially indoors, you'll benefit more from a flash than either a new lens or a new camera.

You'll rarely use a 70-200 indoors, especially with 1.6x crop factor on the Rebel. And the 24-70, while sounds like a great idea, will overlap with your 28-135 and you'll still have low light shooting issues when taking pics of the kiddos at home or at parties, etc.

Outside, in a park or something, I can see the longer lens being a plus, so it's a wash if you think you take 50% of your kids/family shots indoors vs. outdoors. So now I hope I haven't made it worse - new camera, new lens, or new flash? :)


Dmitriy Khaykin (external link)
dk (external link) | f (external link) | ig (external link) | t (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,738 posts
Likes: 4072
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Sep 19, 2012 13:37 |  #4

I agree, you are more than several generations old and the difference between the 300D technology and those in new cameras to day is quite dramatic. Go for the 7D, no question.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14915
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 19, 2012 13:40 |  #5

New body. Newer anyway. ISO performance and the ability to crop is a huge improvement. If the form factor isnt too much, look at the XXD line, a 40D or newer. They are a bit heavier, but the controls are much easier to use on the fly.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zerovision
Goldmember
Avatar
1,204 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Dallas/Ft Worth area
     
Sep 19, 2012 13:54 |  #6

With the team portraits, you probably need a body upgrade and the 28-135 and the 50 will work just fine, but as mentioned above the best upgrade you can make would be off camera flash if your talking about team portraits.

I would recommend either the 60D or the T4i and a Speedlite 600EX-RT. The new T4i has an integrated speedlite transmitter built in for wireless off camera flash. The 60D does not have this option, but it is a great camera for a lot less money that can be put towards getting off camera flash.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Sep 19, 2012 15:02 |  #7

The Dark Knight wrote in post #15014716 (external link)
I think in this case a body upgrade is in order. I think you mean the 300D (I had to google it). I think any entry level body you get now will be a marked improvement in all areas.

I'd get a T3i (or T2i if you can find one) body only, and then also invest in new/ better lenses that suit your needs.

Word!Usually people want a new body and don't realllly need a new body, but in this case, I don't think anyone is gonna think you won't gain some substantial upgrades with a new body. :cool:


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
maverick75
Cream of the Crop
5,718 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 621
Joined May 2012
Location: Riverside,California
     
Sep 19, 2012 15:06 |  #8

Yes upgrade the body, I have a 10D which is the 300D's bigger brother and it can still hang with today's point and shoot copact cameras but it will leave ALOT to be desired compared to recent DSLRs.

It's kinda sad when a newer camera's 3200 ISO looks like our 200 ISO :/

I'm saving up for a 60D though! :D


- Alex Corona Sony A7, Canon 7DM2/EOS M, Mamiya 645/67
Flickr (external link) - 500px (external link) - Website (external link)- Feedback -Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,867 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Upgrade camera body or lens?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2841 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.