When I finish work in the RAW converter, should I convert to JPEG or TIFF when I need to do resizing in another program?
BruceC Senior Member  751 posts Joined Dec 2004 Location: Florida, USA More info | Dec 26, 2005 01:26 | #1 When I finish work in the RAW converter, should I convert to JPEG or TIFF when I need to do resizing in another program?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher  19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Dec 26, 2005 04:04 | #2 It's generally best to stay in TIFF format until you're completely done with it, because of the data that's lost every time you save a JPEG file. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
delinian Senior Member 676 posts Joined May 2005 More info | Dec 26, 2005 06:51 | #3 I agree Curtis. Dennis
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 26, 2005 12:07 | #4 |
WavyC Senior Member 857 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2005 Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland More info | Dec 26, 2005 18:54 | #5 Do you get a similar result if you save to a photoshop doc file (PSD) after converting to raw - no reduction in quality each time you save?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop  26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | Wavy C wrote: Do you get a similar result if you save to a photoshop doc file (PSD) after converting to raw - no reduction in quality each time you save? This is what I normally do. Then I save the final image as a jpg and normally keep the PSD file in case I want to make further changes after seeing a print. Yes, that is correct. That's what I do, too. ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.  More info | Dec 28, 2005 10:05 | #7 Do you get a similar result if you save to a photoshop doc file (PSD) after converting to raw - no reduction in quality each time you save? I save as a tiff & write over the "conversion tiff", to avoid having another large file on my drive. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop  More info | Jan 10, 2006 15:18 | #8 I just found out that my lowly PSE3 allows me to save my images as lossless Jpeg 2000. The images saved are not as huge as .tiff but seems to retain the full quality as a full blown version. Does anyone have experience with Jpeg 2000?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop  6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | Jan 10, 2006 15:20 | #9 Is j2k browser compatable?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop More info | jfrancho wrote: Is j2k browser compatable? I don't know what you mean, but if you mean, for instance, can you see j2k images in, let's say, Windows Viewer, the answer is no. I can see the images using PSE3.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | Jan 10, 2006 16:30 | #11 Web browser, such as IE, Netscape, or Firefox. Also, what printing services accept this format?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SYS Cream of the Crop More info | jfrancho wrote: Web browser, such as IE, Netscape, or Firefox. Also, what printing services accept this format? http://www.jpeg.org/apps/internet.html
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DavidW Goldmember 3,165 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2005 Location: Bedfordshire, UK More info | Jan 13, 2006 11:59 | #13 I've just posted some more information about JPEG 2000, browser plugins and so on in this thread.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2148 guests, 126 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
