Hi all,
I intend to do some traveling in the near future. This will involve a drive across a significant portion of the US, including the Texas panhandle up through Yellowstone. The primary reason for the drive is shuttling a vehicle from point A to B, but I want to take the time to take photos along the way (e.g. landscapes/wildlife in Yellowstone). At the end of the trip there will be social/urban photo opportunities. I will be flying for the return journey.
I've been shuffling the possible equipment combinations I would like to take. My current sig has my equipment, plus I have a 17-40L on the way. But since sigs change, I'll list out my main selections, and reasoning for possible selection. I think I want to take both bodies, as explained:
Bodies:
5DII
T3i
Main group of Lenses:
100-400 (wildlife on T3i, took good shots of Rockies last year)
17-40 (landscapes on 5DII, good urban lens for T3i)
15-85 EF-S (walkaround on T3i)
Other lenses to consider:
100 macro (how much macro will I really want to do, though?)
24L II (for nice background blur/bokeh and low-light situations)
85 1.8 (for nice background blur/bokeh and low-light situations, tighter FoV than 24L)
I also have a Gorillapod coming in anticipation of shots where I want a long exposure but don't need a full tripod set-up. Also bringing my flash, batteries, chargers, yadda yadda yadda.
While we are driving, the "load" of lenses will not be an issue, but the flight back, and just the general hassle of carrying stuff I won't use, means I would like to pare it down to the essentials.
I really want to exercise the 5DII+17-40 combo on landscapes, but the T3i+100-400 is my go-to wildlife set-up. Should I consider taking just one body? If I take just the 5DII, the weight savings of not bringing the T3i seems negligible, especially if it stays attached to the 100-400 90% of the time.
Opinions and feedback appreciated.
shinksma



