Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 21 Sep 2012 (Friday) 16:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Flash with P mode, kinda like slow HSS?

 
guitarjeff
Senior Member
674 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2012
     
Sep 21, 2012 16:49 |  #1

The way I understand ettl, in AV TV and manual modes, the camera takes in to account ambient light and just tries to use your flash to fill in up to a proper exposure, and in P mode the camera doesn't take in to account the ambient light and uses your flash to get the entire exposure from only it.

So when using P mode, you can get a darker background because the camera uses only the flash to light the subject, causing the background to be darkened, so then isn't P mode with flash indoors kind of like HSS mode in bright outdoors?

If I raise my shutter speed in P mode the camera will fire the flash at higher power to compensate thereby darkening the ambient light. So as long as you are in a normal indoor environment and not in brighter daylight, then the 1/200 shutter speed should be able to lower the ambient light while the camera gets a good exposure on the subject.

So P mode with flash can be considered as kind of a low-light HSS function, is that right?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FEChariot
Goldmember
Avatar
4,427 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 347
Joined Sep 2011
     
Sep 21, 2012 19:05 |  #2

This is a good read for you and will be much more eloquant than I:

http://photonotes.org/​articles/eos-flash/ (external link)


Canon 7D/350D, Σ17-50/2.8 OS, 18-55IS, 24-105/4 L IS, Σ30/1.4 EX, 50/1.8, C50/1.4, 55-250IS, 60/2.8, 70-200/4 L IS, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 IS L, 135/2 L 580EX II, 430EX II * 2, 270EX II.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Sep 21, 2012 22:03 |  #3

Most of your first paragraph is false. Regardless of camera mode, E-TTL does not "take into account" the ambient light level. Ambient exposure and flash exposure are metered separately and independently.

Also, the camera will render the same ambient exposure in Av, Tv or P modes. The only exception to this is that in P mode, it won't use a shutter speed slower than 1/60. So when your ISO setting and the lighting conditions are insufficient to get proper ambient exposure at 1/60, the camera will choose underexposed ambient rather than the potential motion blur from a slow shutter speed.

Now, on to your second incorrect assumption, that HSS mode renders underexposed ambient in a bright environment. HSS simply allows fast shutter speeds (and therefore wide aperture settings) so you can use flash while blurring the background in a bright environment.

In your third paragraph you mention, "If I raise my shutter speed in P mode..." P mode doesn't allow you to set the shutter speed per se. It does allow you to shift the exposure settings, to speed up the shutter while opening the aperture, or vice-versa.

In summary, the premise of your thread title has no merit.

If you want to control the ambient exposure in a flash photograph, switch to M mode and use a shutter speed + aperture + ISO combination that will render the ambient exposure you desire.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Sep 22, 2012 13:26 as a reply to  @ Curtis N's post |  #4

Which means that if you do shorten the shutter speed in P mode, the aperture will become larger and the flash will actually use a lower power, not a higher one. But you can't shift the shutter speed in P mode when you use a flash, so it's a moot point.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
guitarjeff
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
674 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Feb 2012
     
Sep 22, 2012 13:31 as a reply to  @ apersson850's post |  #5

Thanks for the great explanations guys, just what I was hoping for.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBrick3
Goldmember
Avatar
2,094 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: College Park, Md.
     
Sep 22, 2012 13:34 |  #6

Yeah, in P, AV, or TV mode the camera will first figure out settings that will allow for an "even" exposure regardless of whether or not the flash is there. I almost always use my camera in M mode and usually use manual flash over ETTL, too, so I'm not the best to ask. But if you're in P, A, or TV and using the flash in ETTL the flash is going to be low power and basically just fill. That might yield a good result and the flash will help freeze the subject if you have a low shutter speed. You can of course use exposure compensation in the flash or camera to give yourself more control -- but seems like utilizing manual modes might be best if seeking control.


1D III 5D II 5D | 580 EX II x 2
17-40L | 35L | 100L | 70-200 II | 17-35 f/2.8-f/4
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Sep 22, 2012 17:42 as a reply to  @ TheBrick3's post |  #7

It's actually so that cameras with E-TTL II (all newer digital cameras) measure the difference between ambient and flash light, when the preflash is fired. The different zones in the exposure meter are used for this, so cameras with 63 zone metering (7D) does this better than the previous 35 zone metering (5D Mark II).
If a zone peaks heavily when the flash is lit, then it's disregarded as probably being a mirror or something similar.
On the other hand, if there's no different with and without flash, the zone is disregarded as obviously being outside the range of the flash.
The the zones that are in between, i.e. made brighter by the flash, are evaluated, with emphasis on zone(s) that coincide with AF points that are in focus.
Ambient metering is also a bit adjusted, since if the camera's setting is such that the camera can achieve a standard exposure without the flash, then that standard exposure is reduced by about one stop, to allow for adding flash light without overexposing things that otherwise would be at standard exposure already before the flash fired. If you use P-mode indoors in the evening, it will not allow you to get up to standard exposure of the background (lest you have sky-high ISO), so this reduction isn't necessary. The flash will provide the brunt of the light anyway.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Sep 24, 2012 19:12 |  #8

apersson850 wrote in post #15029131 (external link)
It's actually so that cameras with E-TTL II (all newer digital cameras) measure the difference between ambient and flash light, when the preflash is fired. The different zones in the exposure meter are used for this, so cameras with 63 zone metering (7D) does this better than the previous 35 zone metering (5D Mark II).
If a zone peaks heavily when the flash is lit, then it's disregarded as probably being a mirror or something similar.
On the other hand, if there's no different with and without flash, the zone is disregarded as obviously being outside the range of the flash.
The the zones that are in between, i.e. made brighter by the flash, are evaluated, with emphasis on zone(s) that coincide with AF points that are in focus.
Ambient metering is also a bit adjusted, since if the camera's setting is such that the camera can achieve a standard exposure without the flash, then that standard exposure is reduced by about one stop, to allow for adding flash light without overexposing things that otherwise would be at standard exposure already before the flash fired. If you use P-mode indoors in the evening, it will not allow you to get up to standard exposure of the background (lest you have sky-high ISO), so this reduction isn't necessary. The flash will provide the brunt of the light anyway.

An eloquent description of flash logic. Canon flash does have programming called 'NEVEC' which does alter exposure settings a bit, but NEVEC does not always hold true. Most of the time (except for academic discussion) I ignore the effects of NEVEC. Unfortunately the text in blue cannot be proven to be true, as this series shows...

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/FlashExp.jpg

Test conditions:
  • Photos 1, 3, and 5 have no flash, as baseline exposures; 2, 4, 6 all have direct ETTL flash, to judge the effect of addition of flash to baseline.
  • The camera was in evaluative ambient metering, with the focus point on top of the Colorchecker target, so ambient metering would be biased to that focus location.
  • ETTL was set so that evaluative flash metering (factory standard) was set; CFn for Av shutter speed was set to force 1/250 for flash shots.
  • Post processing settings were identical for all shots, with the exception of White Balance, due to some shots being made with incandescent overhead downlights; WB was post processed with eyedropper to render 4th grey sample as neutral.
Observations:
  • Eyedropper values for photos 1,3 (no flash) RGB=52%
    Eydropper values for photos 2,4 (flash) RGB=42%
    Eyedropper value for photo 5 (no flash) RGB=45%
    Eyedropper value for photo 6 (flash) RGB=61%
  • Photos 5 and 6 only differ in ambient settings by 1/3EV (f/3.5 vs. f/4), and that difference can be easily explained that P mode selects 1/60 f/4 as default.
    We also see that photos 4 and 5 differ in ambient settings by -4EV (1/8 vs. 1/60) because P mode selects 1/60 as default flash shutter speed.
  • Photos 5 and 6 differ in target brightness by about 0.78EV of exposure (flash shot 6 is 0.78EV brighter than no-flash shot 5)

Conclusions:
In adding flash, (photo 1 to 2, and photo 3 to 4, and photo 5 to 6) there is no apparent -1EV reduction in amount of exposure given for ambient, (contrary to blue text) to account for the addition of flash!
If I stand in a situation where 1/100 f/2.8 was needed in Av for ambient-only exposure (ISO1600), when I turn on the flash the camera says 1/160 f/2.8! The effects of NEVEC are in action.
If I stand in a situation where 1/400 f/2.8 was needed in Av for ambient-only exposure, when I turn on the flash the camera still says 1/250 f/2.8!

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,012 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Flash with P mode, kinda like slow HSS?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1459 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.