Dec 28, 2005 12:58 | #31 That's exactly what I was doing Jon. If you notice, the first two pictures were from my day at the park using the lens, which is the first thing I did with it. The cereal shots, which I did because people here recommended it as a better sample of its performance, were done the next day and took five minutes. After I finished them, I went out and used the lens for a couple more hours.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
condyk Africa's #1 Tour Guide  20,887 posts Likes: 22 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Birmingham, UK More info | JGUF wrote: That's exactly what I was doing Jon. If you notice, the first two pictures were from my day at the park using the lens ...
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1203740
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop  69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | JGUF wrote: That's exactly what I was doing Jon. If you notice, the first two pictures were from my day at the park using the lens, which is the first thing I did with it. The cereal shots, which I did because people here recommended it as a better sample of its performance, were done the next day and took five minutes. After I finished them, I went out and used the lens for a couple more hours. Fine. Just didn't want you to get too tied up testing the lens! Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word"  More info | Jon wrote: Fine. Just didn't want you to get too tied up testing the lens! hey jon...maybe you better get out there and take a few pics too! http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | Dec 28, 2005 13:58 | #35 Can't - I'm at work! Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
m3incorp wrote: It is an outstanding lens. Though I intend to get the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8, I still with probably keep the F4L. I was thinking the same thing until today. The price difference is not that big of a deal, but the Sigma is 2.8 lbs. (1.27 kilos) as opposed to the 1.5 lbs. (0.68 kilos) for the Canon. Kerry Sanders | flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT  10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | I totally love mine. Tack sharp wide open.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
You guys did it to me. I just ordered the EF 70-200mm f/4L USM. Kerry Sanders | flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | kwsanders wrote: You guys did it to me. I just ordered the EF 70-200mm f/4L USM.  LOL ... I don't think you'll be sorry ...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
edrader "I am not the final word" More info | kwsanders wrote: You guys did it to me. I just ordered the EF 70-200mm f/4L USM. http://instagram.com/edraderphotography/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
upsracingfan Member  59 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Vineland, NJ More info | Santa just brought me the same lens and so far I love it. CANON REBEL XT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
upsracingfan wrote: Santa just brought me the same lens and so far I love it. I cannot wait for my belated present to get here. I thought for a while about spending the extra cash for next day air, but I decided to save the money after looking at the forecast for our area this weekend. It is going to rain anyway, so no go on shooting. Kerry Sanders | flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | kwsanders wrote: Did you get the collar with your lens? I need to find a place to pick it up sort of cheap. It is about one-quarter the price of the lens. Get the Black one for $89 ... same as white but $30 cheaper and looks better IMO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bluedog_XT wrote: Get the Black one for $89 ... same as white but $30 cheaper and looks better IMO. From whence can someone get it? Kerry Sanders | flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tsmith Formerly known as Bluedog_XT 10,429 posts Likes: 26 Joined Jul 2005 Location: South_the 601 More info | kwsanders wrote: From whence can someone get it? B&H and ignore the fact it says for the 200mm f/2.8L II. It works fine on the 70-200 f/4L ... I have one >
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2508 guests, 102 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
