Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Sep 2012 (Tuesday) 23:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Just a Simple Question About Dynamic Range

 
Azathoth
" ...whose name no lips dare speak aloud"
Avatar
1,521 posts
Gallery: 692 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 4748
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Funchal
     
Oct 09, 2012 17:13 |  #136

kcbrown wrote in post #15097745 (external link)
Heh.

Actually, I think the IQ of current rebels is so close to that of the 7D that the difference doesn't matter. The 7D's high ISO performance is just barely better than the T4i's. The difference was visible, yes, but barely so.

Yeah look at this:
http://www.dpreview.co​m/reviews/canoneos1100​D/18 (external link)

Choosing for example ISO 6400 in a Canon 1100D (T3), 7D, 60D and 500D (T1i). Noise is higher in 500D and lower on 7D but there isn't that much of a difference.


500px (external link) | flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Instagram (external link) | Blue Jimny Madeira (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
THREAD ­ STARTER
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,439 posts
Gallery: 622 photos
Likes: 3075
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Oct 09, 2012 21:01 |  #137

crbeveri wrote in post #15100165 (external link)
1st. Thanks everyone for your discussions on dynamic range. This has been a very informative and educational post. Probably one of the best I have seen in a while. bw!

To KenjiS. What about the Canon 20mm f/2.8 USM? I don't know anything about this lens so not sure of it's quality. Sure it's just a bit wider than 35mm (@ 32mm) but you can crop into the image. I do agree with you tho. I missed being able to look through my view finder and see what I expected to see on a 50mm when I had my 50D and other than high ISO noise it was a major reason I went to the 5D. But you are right, there is something about film and the feel and look it produces. I guess that's why I still shoot film too haha.

Glad I can help :)

On the 20mm f/2.8, its not that bad optically on a cropper from my understanding, but the MFD is a bit long (MM is 1:7 or so) versus the 1:5:5 on a 35mm f/1.4L.. the Sigma 20mm f/1.8 is a closer fit (1:4 MM) It sucks in the corners on a FF body (But then again, I'm not using a FF body! its VERY good in the center which is all my 7D would use!) and its a consideration.. I love the "exaggeration" a wide lens gives when shoved up close to a subject...

Option 1 is i get a FF body and just enjoy my 28mm f/1.8 even more, Option 2 is i just get something wider on my 7D ;) a 20mm f/1.8 or a UWA zoom for instance...

But anyways, At one point I had discussed how i liked some of my film shots and folks here said it was likely just the way lenses behave on full frame.. None of my old glass was really "Special" (When i shot film i ran the 15-30, 50mm f/1.4 and 200mm f/2.8L) I kinda miss my 15-30.. the only reason I havnt picked up a 8-16 is because I keep wobbling on the full frame fence...


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Oct 10, 2012 00:12 |  #138

KenjiS wrote in post #15101350 (external link)
But anyways, At one point I had discussed how i liked some of my film shots and folks here said it was likely just the way lenses behave on full frame.. None of my old glass was really "Special" (When i shot film i ran the 15-30, 50mm f/1.4 and 200mm f/2.8L) I kinda miss my 15-30.. the only reason I havnt picked up a 8-16 is because I keep wobbling on the full frame fence...

You really should just get the 8-16 and see how you like it. I think you'll be very impressed as long as you get a good copy.

For instance, I took this while standing underneath the tree:

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7223/7304194182_1829ec8619_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/n2185x/73041941​82/  (external link)
IMG_6814-2.jpg (external link) by n2185x (external link), on Flickr

I think if you're going to go full frame, you should probably have some solid, articulable reasons. But you seem to be quite happy with your 7D, and as long as it keeps producing shots that you really like, why switch?

I was going to go full frame myself, but in the end I just can't see enough of a difference between it and a good crop camera to really make it worthwhile, especially since in doing so, I'll have to use considerably larger and heavier lenses (e.g., the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC instead of the Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS) to cover the same focal length ranges while retaining the real advantage of full frame: shallow depth of field latitude.

If I were dissatisfied with the results I can get with my 7D, then I'd be jumping on a 5D3 for sure (I'm very fortunate in that I can afford it if I really want it), but I can't see a compelling reason to do so when I'm getting results like this:

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7240/7081616031_2b1b9bb2fc_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/n2185x/70816160​31/  (external link)
IMG_6397-1.jpg (external link) by n2185x (external link), on Flickr

"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stsva
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,363 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 285
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Oct 10, 2012 09:13 |  #139

kfreels wrote in post #15099362 (external link)
Right. So lenses play a part as well. Interestingly, if you had an APS-C sensor that could oversample - perhaps getting to the 24MP resolution level, and you had the lenses to do it, you could do away with the A/A filter entirely. That also happens to be a number that often pops up regarding rumors of a 7D mkII. Also, the delayed development of a new sensor for the 7DII has been rumored to be the cause of the unprecendented 2.0 firmware update that recently came out. The aggressive AA filter is a big gripe of many 7D owners so it leads me to wonder if Canon doesn't have a new trick up its sleeve soon in releasing the 7D replacement with a 24MP sensor that does away with the AA filter entirely. WIth dual digic 5 processors that would be able to put out about 10 fps. That also happens to be just the camera it would take to pry my 7D from my fingertips.

Now THAT would be an interesting upgrade! :D


Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
Member of the GIYF
Club and
HAMSTTR
٩ Breeders Club https://photography-on-the.net …=744235&highlig​ht=hamsttr Join today!
Image Editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ride5000
Goldmember
1,422 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2008
     
Oct 10, 2012 10:05 |  #140

i use a pretty simple method: when dealing with supersaturated colors in the subject, underexpose so as to not clip single channels. i usually go about 1/2 to 1 stop.


flickr (external link)

5dc w/ee-s, rokinon 85mm f/1.4, rokinon 35mm f/1.4, rokinon 8mm f/3.5, sigma 24 f/1.8, canon 35-135 f/3.5-4.5, canon 50mm f/1.8, nikkor s-auto 50mm f/1.4, tokina 11-16 f/2.8, 430ex2, pcb e640, oc-3, st-e2, pixel knight tr332, DiCAPac WPS10, b+w 10 stop nd, hoya hd cpl, kenko ext. tubes, brolly, diy softbox, etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

20,799 views & 0 likes for this thread, 30 members have posted to it.
Just a Simple Question About Dynamic Range
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1551 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.