KenjiS wrote in post #15101350
But anyways, At one point I had discussed how i liked some of my film shots and folks here said it was likely just the way lenses behave on full frame.. None of my old glass was really "Special" (When i shot film i ran the 15-30, 50mm f/1.4 and 200mm f/2.8L) I kinda miss my 15-30.. the only reason I havnt picked up a 8-16 is because I keep wobbling on the full frame fence...
You really should just get the 8-16 and see how you like it. I think you'll be very impressed as long as you get a good copy.
For instance, I took this while standing underneath the tree:
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/n2185x/7304194182/
IMG_6814-2.jpg
by
n2185x
, on Flickr
I think if you're going to go full frame, you should probably have some solid, articulable reasons. But you seem to be quite happy with your 7D, and as long as it keeps producing shots that you really like, why switch?
I was going to go full frame myself, but in the end I just can't see enough of a difference between it and a
good crop camera to really make it worthwhile, especially since in doing so, I'll have to use considerably larger and heavier lenses (e.g., the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC instead of the Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS) to cover the same focal length ranges while retaining the real advantage of full frame: shallow depth of field latitude.
If I were dissatisfied with the results I can get with my 7D, then I'd be jumping on a 5D3 for sure (I'm very fortunate in that I
can afford it if I really want it), but I can't see a compelling reason to do so when I'm getting results like this:
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/n2185x/7081616031/
IMG_6397-1.jpg
by
n2185x
, on Flickr