Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 27 Dec 2005 (Tuesday) 02:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Authentic Texas Honkytonk - [Architecture]

 
ninjatune
Member
Avatar
118 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Dallas
     
Dec 27, 2005 02:18 |  #1

Welcome to Gilley's of Dallas...

Located on the southside of downtown, this jumpin little juke joint can be classified as a real-life Texas honky-tonk - with a twist. Where Bikini bull riding, and Professional Boxing are just the beginning. This monument to good-clean Texas fun takes place within the old Schepps warehouse off Lamar just south of the interstate.

Below I've posted two versions of the same image. The first frame is w/out any cropping just as the camera captured it. The second is slightly different. In an attempt to improve on the rule of thirds I cropped a small portion of the right side out, and added a small amount of sky to give the Gilley's sign some breathing room. I've also adjusted the colors just a tad in #2.

I was wondering which of the two you like best.. As always, I'm all ears to everyones thoughts and ideas.
Thanks in advance for any feedback/comments..

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


Thanks for looking!



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nidz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,408 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2005
Location: VIC, Australia
     
Dec 27, 2005 05:09 |  #2

I think the second one is better.. the bricks seem a little richer in colour than the first one.


Stop or I'll Shoot!
10 Years on POTN Forums!
Canon 350D | 70-200f/4L | ef35-105mm | ef100-300mm | 50mm f1.8 etc..
Some of my Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ninjatune
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
118 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Dallas
     
Dec 27, 2005 05:48 as a reply to  @ Nidz's post |  #3

Nidz wrote:
I think the second one is better.. the bricks seem a little richer in colour than the first one.

are you partial to either one in regards to composition?

thanks :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
quickben
Fairy Gapped
Avatar
1,512 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 162
Joined Mar 2004
Location: Whitley Bay, UK
     
Dec 27, 2005 06:16 as a reply to  @ ninjatune's post |  #4

I think the second composition is better. The relationship between the sign and the building is stronger. I can't decide whether it's oversaturated or just really vibrant, though. What method did you use to get the colors ?

Gary.


Fighting the war against the unnecessary use of the Book Worthy Smiley
My name is Gary, not Ben.
6D 24-70/2.8VC 85/1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adam*
Goldmember
Avatar
4,411 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sheffield
     
Dec 27, 2005 06:25 |  #5

I'd go with #2 definately. Great colours.


:: For sale: 70-200 2.8L :: Nikon D700 ::
:: my site :: www.pbase.com/adamgray​photography (external link) ::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ninjatune
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
118 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Dallas
     
Dec 27, 2005 07:25 as a reply to  @ quickben's post |  #6

quickben wrote:
I think the second composition is better. The relationship between the sign and the building is stronger. I can't decide whether it's oversaturated or just really vibrant, though. What method did you use to get the colors ?

Gary.

Believe it or not they were just really vibrant to begin with. Each version (color wise) received very simple adjustments in CS2. In #1: Auto Levels > Sharpen > Resize > + apx 6 points of contrast and brightness... #2: The only difference was instead of Auto Level I chose the Auto Color option. Nothing special at all.. I stuck to the very basics, as I was quite pleased with the exposure and colors as they were... which is rare..

I'm glad to hear everyone likes the second version so far. I had hoped to hear that..

Thanks guys ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,318 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Authentic Texas Honkytonk - [Architecture]
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2316 guests, 130 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.